Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2004, 12:45 AM
IB Adrian's Avatar
IB Adrian IB Adrian is offline
Site Administrator
2000 Ford F-350
My Garage
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: under the hood
Posts: 15,876
IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation
3/4 ton diesels

Now I know this has been thrashed to death on this forum but...
I would like a complete understanding of what everyone thinks here of the 6.0PSD and its competition (we in Oz get none of these engines, we only get the 7.3l PSD)
My understanding thus far:

Cummins:
Pros:
Arguably the most durable engine, Cummins reputation, simple straight 6 design, lots of low down torque, prehaps the best engine/manual trans combo, so far the most successful engine for modding for truck pulls, highest stock torque figures, and equal highest power figures
Cons:
Design outdated, far and away the slowest of the 3 engines, torque curve drops considerably at higher rpm, mated with very average auto trans, engine likely to be replaced soon, Its a Dodge

Duramax:
Pros:
Quite a high tech design, works very well at higher rpm, largest capacity engine, gets a proven Allison transmission, very good for modding for truck pulls, reports are it is quite a reliable engine
Cons:
Previous GM diesels tarnish reputation, Isuzu an unkown quantity in the Amercan truck market, Allison transmission now quite dated, Aluminium heads are questionable for long term reliablity, not enough low rpm torque

PSD:
Pros:
The most high tech diesel, gains strong 7.3l PSD AND Ford reputation, the fastest stock truck, the best auto transmission, the flattest torque curve
Cons:
Early teething issues have tarnished reputation, the hardest truck to mod for truck pulls, lowest quoted power and torque figures.

From this I rate PSD number 1, Duramax a close number 2, Cummins a distant 3rd
What am I missing?
What are your thoughts?
Also I believe all engines have similar fuel consumption, am I correct?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2004, 01:05 AM
FORD352V8 FORD352V8 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 938
FORD352V8 is starting off with a positive reputation.
its not bad but I warn you are opening a huge can of worms here theres gonna be some serious flaming. I prefer my 7.3L over the 6.0L does not have a low-end. The 7.3L is excellent and I think its better then the 6.0L Sure its a little slower but a little more air in and out and that story changes. Low-end torqe is what counts for towing, but most HD truck buyers do not use there trucks for HD towing mostly for grocery getting and maybe a trialer to haul ATV's. That said the Cummins is a dog. The only way the Cummins could be competive is if it had 8 gears minium. They are great in OTR trucks but those trucks got 10 speeds and 18 speeds. The power band is too small on the cummins. I have not seen anyone bash the 7.3L until the 6.0L came out. So it doseant do zero to sixty in 7 seconds and now it sucks right? The 7.3L is a better towing engine hands down!
__________________
1966 F-100 Flareside
High Peformance 352FE
Twin I Beam Suspension
4spd

1996 F-350 7.3L PSD
CC/SRW/4x4/5spd
4.10 Rear

SIT DOWN, SHUT UP, AND HANG ON
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2004, 08:22 AM
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim IB Tim is offline
Site Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 53,016
IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation
Snap-pop-woooooosh, that was the can of worms opening...
Let us keep this on nice
__________________
Administrator
tim.lamkin@internetbrands dot com
Life is not only time……paradoxically, it is the denial of time!
What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2004, 12:16 PM
DMAX-HD's Avatar
DMAX-HD DMAX-HD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,279
DMAX-HD is starting off with a positive reputation.
Bigf350,

You've hit a couple things right on the head a couple others could go either way(comment of Allison being dated and Isuzu being an unknown). My personal feeling is that either of the V designs are fine (Ford or GM) especially for hwy towing. If I was seriously in the market it'd sure be hard to look past Fords '05 model O but Chevy just up'ed tq to 605 f/lbs. So confusing...

But having had a 7.3 litre before the D/A I can tell you it really doesn't compare to the 6'o or the Dmax - performance wise. Great motor though never gave me a lick of problems.
__________________
2007 D/A - Crew cab LT Z71 3/4 ton - lots of goodies
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2004, 12:25 PM
DMAX-HD's Avatar
DMAX-HD DMAX-HD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,279
DMAX-HD is starting off with a positive reputation.
I didn't read the fuel consumption part. From what I read. Pulling load all 3 seem to be the same. Empty the DMax appears to do a lil better (18-19) cept in the winter - all bets are off.

Also for 1 of your pros for the Dmax is really meant for the PSD 'works better @ higher RPM's'. The PSD actaully has the higher RPM. Like the Aluminum heads of the Dmax - that could be a pro or a con only time will tell. Also GM addressed the the tq coming on to late and moved it lower in the powerband to 1600 RPM's some time ago vs. the intitial 1800 RPM. The tq curve between the 2 is very close.

1 other thing we always bicker about is SFA vs. IFS. Pros and cons to both - if you do a search you dig up that nasty lil thread too. I'm torn - I want both - if it were possible.
__________________
2007 D/A - Crew cab LT Z71 3/4 ton - lots of goodies
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2004, 06:40 PM
IB Adrian's Avatar
IB Adrian IB Adrian is offline
Site Administrator
2000 Ford F-350
My Garage
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: under the hood
Posts: 15,876
IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMAX-HD
Bigf350,

You've hit a couple things right on the head a couple others could go either way(comment of Allison being dated and Isuzu being an unknown).
The reason I put the Allison being dated, is that is what I am told compared to the Torqshift...
As for Isuzu being an unknown, I only stated that in the American truck market, us down in Oz have had Isuzu making Trucks for years (my old man had one that gave no trouble for 400 000km), so not saying they can't build Diesels, just saying they are yet to earn a reputation like Navistar and Cummins in the States.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2004, 07:17 PM
jroehl jroehl is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 5,189
jroehl has much to be proud of jroehl has much to be proud of jroehl has much to be proud of jroehl has much to be proud of jroehl has much to be proud of jroehl has much to be proud of jroehl has much to be proud of jroehl has much to be proud of jroehl has much to be proud of
Just to clarify a little about Isuzu. I don't know about other parts of the country, but I sure see alot of Isuzu diesel box trucks around. Granted, it's not the same as the engine they put in 3/4- and 1-ton trucks for heavy haulin' and towin', but they've been around a while as delivery trucks. Anyone know what the engine they use is?

Jason
__________________
-1993 F250 XLT xcab LB 351 2wd E4OD 4.10 open (parked, tranny issues)

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

http://folding.extremeoverclocking.c...e.php?u=402948
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2004, 07:44 AM
FERacing66 FERacing66 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Jackassville
Posts: 1,354
FERacing66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
izuzu does make good motors. No doubt about that. They are only forign to Americans. People around the world use them and they are relaiable.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2004, 12:05 PM
DMAX-HD's Avatar
DMAX-HD DMAX-HD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,279
DMAX-HD is starting off with a positive reputation.
Another thing I noticed is your name being BIG350. And this is 1 thing that really erks me about the GM offering is if you get a 1 ton it has to be the dully. They don't make a 1 ton that isn't a dully. That turns a lot of folks off right away.
__________________
2007 D/A - Crew cab LT Z71 3/4 ton - lots of goodies
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2004, 08:10 PM
aketay aketay is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 34
aketay is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMAX-HD
Another thing I noticed is your name being BIG350. And this is 1 thing that really erks me about the GM offering is if you get a 1 ton it has to be the dully. They don't make a 1 ton that isn't a dully. That turns a lot of folks off right away.
They do make a SRW 1-ton, long-bed only..mostly fleet vehicles and very hard to find.
__________________
06' GMC C4500 DMax/Alli 5-speed, 4.56 rear, Monroe air ride conversion.

Last edited by aketay; 09-17-2004 at 08:11 PM. Reason: more info
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2004, 09:03 PM
racsan's Avatar
racsan racsan is offline
Posting Guru
1993 Ford Ranger
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: central ohio
Posts: 1,498
racsan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
i havent driven any of the diesels, but back in '86 dad bought a new f250 std cab 2wd with the 6.9 navastar with the creeper - first 4 spd. we had nothing but problems with that truck. glow plugs burning out, injecter pump tuning, would get good fuel milage but have no power, had dealer turn it up, ran like a 460 but drank the fuel and fogged for mosquitos, twice i had the shifter come up out of the trans when i was going from 2nd to 3rd, and it wound up in reverse. would get stuck on wet grass, all that engine weight up front and not enough chassis weight for the rear axle. had to be plugged in overnight if temperture dropped below 45. was a real hot-rod with the pump turned up and empty, but a real dissapointment as a truck. im a ford fan through and through but i beleive this one was a real fowled over rebuilt dodge. we traded it in with only 12,000 miles for a new '89 bronco. and dad swore he'd never have another diesel pickup. personally, id like to have the ford chassis, with the cummins engine, and even though im pro-stick shift, the allison automatic. anyone else have a problematic 6.9?
__________________
'93 Ranger Supercab,4.0L,4x4 5spd-hurst equipped. mile marker manual hubs. "the green machine" http://www.myspace.com/small_dog_trucking
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3216869
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2004, 10:42 PM
bodabdan's Avatar
bodabdan bodabdan is offline
Brute Force and Ignorance
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Back in LA
Posts: 1,446
bodabdan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE. bodabdan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Big350-

I noticed that you mentioned truck pulls a couple of times. I can't speak first hand but I have been a gearhead long enough to know that if you are buying a truck to pull with, any truck that you mentioned could be made to work with the right amount of $$$.
IMO I think that the peak hp/torque numbers are not nearly as important as the overall torque and hp curve. What good is peak power at 3000 rpm if you can't get the motor up to 3000 with a load?
I own a 7.3 so I can't speak first hand much about the 6.0. I can tell you though that there were some major and minor bugs when the 6.0 came out, but most of the bugs can be addressed by your dealer. The current 6.0 is a good motor. The Ford is a good truck, as is the Dodge and the Chevy. I really don't believe that any of the big 3 make junk.
As far as Isuzu making engines, I am uncomfortable with their motors in American products but that doesn't mean it's not good, I'm just stubborn that way. Mercury marine made the engines for the ZR-1 corvette, and that worked pretty well.
__________________
1997 F-250HD 7.3 PSD 4x4---FPR Shim*Rear Disc brake conversion*2" suspension lift*Tymar intake*3"x4" downpipe 4" exhaust*Tony Wildman Chip*Autometer c2 cobalts
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2004, 02:35 AM
IB Adrian's Avatar
IB Adrian IB Adrian is offline
Site Administrator
2000 Ford F-350
My Garage
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: under the hood
Posts: 15,876
IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation IB Adrian has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodabdan
I have been a gearhead long enough to know that if you are buying a truck to pull with, any truck that you mentioned could be made to work with the right amount of $$$.
Yeah I agree with you, but
I am of the understanding the PSD is the hardest and the most expensive of the 3 engines to be a really good truck pull competitor.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2004, 02:40 AM
FordLariat FordLariat is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: pound
Posts: 1,396
FordLariat is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have heard that the PSD does very well in the truck pulls, so it may not be as hard to mod as you would think.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2004, 08:13 AM
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim IB Tim is offline
Site Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 53,016
IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation
Does any body realy pull with a stock truck at those races?
__________________
Administrator
tim.lamkin@internetbrands dot com
Life is not only time……paradoxically, it is the denial of time!
What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.