Newest year 351W for 302 swap?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-03-2004, 11:14 AM
shivesy's Avatar
shivesy
shivesy is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Newest year 351W for 302 swap?

I have a 93 Ford Bronco- EFI- 5.0-E40D auto and plan on doing a swap to a 351W. I have been reading alot of post on this site that have been really helpful. I'm leaning towards searching for a 351W at a salvage yard so I can take all the goodies home with me to do the swap.
My question is (in your opinion) What is the newest year and latest year that would be best for this swap and how many miles on the engine are to many? Thanks, Ronnie
 
  #2  
Old 09-03-2004, 11:47 AM
jwtaylor's Avatar
jwtaylor
jwtaylor is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you want the best available 351w block, not really from a strength aspect, as they all are about the same but from capability, get a block that has a casting number F4TE stamped near the starter. That block will allow you to use a flat tappet or a roller cam by simply adding 5.0 retainers, roller lifters, and h bars, and inexpensive. If you get a non roller capable block, any other than a F4TE you will need to either get a reduced base circle camshaft, tap the block for the retainer lifters and risk hitting the cam or linked roller lifters, either is more expensive and not as easy as just dropping in the camshaft and lifter. From what I have read the main bearings are ususally the first to go and that can occur around 150-200,000 miles but in reality its engine specific, do a simple compression test and if possible put a mechanical oil gauge on it and take note of the psi, that would tell you more than guessing. Just a thought, later
 
  #3  
Old 09-03-2004, 11:57 AM
shivesy's Avatar
shivesy
shivesy is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JWTaylor:
Thanks for your time but that wasn't the info I was looking for.
 
  #4  
Old 09-03-2004, 12:06 PM
jwtaylor's Avatar
jwtaylor
jwtaylor is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
?????


The F4TE block is the latest block 93 +/- to 97 (f-250's) after that no more 5.8's.

Maybe you can reword your question and I will try and answer it. I don't have the best comprehension skills. Later
 
  #5  
Old 09-03-2004, 12:12 PM
jwtaylor's Avatar
jwtaylor
jwtaylor is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I get it now...you want to know what will be a direct swap. I would still aim for the 93-97 block with f4te casting number. There are many that have done this swap and reused the 5.0 computer, meaning took the 5.0 out, dropped the 5.8 in and connected the wiring harness to the firewall and called it good. Just be sure to get a speed density or mass air efi dependant on what you have now, if you choose to keep the 5.0 computer, otherwise its all a direct swap over. I would look for a 97 f-250 as they came from the factory with a roller cam installed, all other did not, be sure its an auto tranny e4od. Am I getting closer? later
 
  #6  
Old 09-03-2004, 12:39 PM
shivesy's Avatar
shivesy
shivesy is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks JW:
Yes you nailed half my question. I was leaning towards a 96 because I didn't know that Ford made the 351W in 97. Thanks to you now I know. If I can find a 97 I will take the computer, wiring harness, mass air flow and install that into the Bronco with the motor.
Now for the second half of the question about milage. I don't think I would want a motor with 100,000 miles but think that 50,000 would be acceptable. In your opinion waht would you feel comfortable with?
 
  #7  
Old 09-03-2004, 12:56 PM
jwtaylor's Avatar
jwtaylor
jwtaylor is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats kinda why I mentioned if possible do a compression test and get and actual oil psi reading of the engine. These two things will give you a real good idea of the condition of the valves, rings and main bearings. A 50,000 mile engine could be junk and a 100,000 mile as good as new, many variables, know what I mean. Personally, I think 50,000-75,000 sounds good, sounds like you just wanna drop something in and forget about it for a while. In my experience it doesn't matter what vehicle I have owned, at 100,000 miles it seems to never fail that something goes, may just be a sensor but sensors can add up...haha. Sounds like you have a solid plan. I hate to be one of those people but being you have the 5.0, it might be cheaper to stroke your engine to 347 and do a stock rebuild, then you know the conditon of the engine, and have close to 351 cubic inches but less weight on the front end. Just thought I would mention it, good luck with your project
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
big ronnie herr
Maryland Chapter
5
07-25-2010 01:03 PM
Adam0331
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
52
01-19-2009 03:41 PM
Ronnie Smith
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
03-12-2007 07:20 AM
195586ronnie
New Member Introductions
1
09-15-2006 04:23 AM
f150ronnie
New Member Introductions
2
03-21-2005 11:40 AM



Quick Reply: Newest year 351W for 302 swap?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 PM.