1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Recommendations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-22-2004, 11:43 AM
Woodsman_30350's Avatar
Woodsman_30350
Woodsman_30350 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Comfort, TX
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Recommendations

As a new member, I am amazed at the wealth of knowledge available on this site. Unfortunately I am a newbie with a newly purchased 1950 F-1 which is all original except for the wheels. I want to change out the drivetrain and suspension and am comteplating the following options:

Ford 302 "F" with CTI Mustang II IFS and new rear end. The folks as TCI just competed a similar project and recommended a 96 or newer Explorer rear end.

Chevy 283 with same IFS. Not sure about the rear end for this one.

As for transmissions, I would really love to have a manual 4 speed floor shift but everyone I talk to says it is very difficult to get the linkages right. The only other option is automatic (C4 I guess)

Any comments will be appreicated. Take it easy on my since this is my first project.
 
  #2  
Old 04-22-2004, 04:59 PM
Jet Jock's Avatar
Jet Jock
Jet Jock is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Limestone, TN
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Woodsman

A FORD motor is the right choice. I have a 'girly' 302 in mine does a great job. It will cruise at interstate speed and still do 15 to 17 mpg.
351 will give you more punch the choice is up to you as both are a good choice. A 283 in my mind isn't evern a consideration.
A C4 or and AOD is a good transmission choice with the 302 or 351. If you go with the BIG MOTORS, like some here will try to tell you to do, ( they have relatives in the oil business) you will have a screaming machine but you will need the C6.
The rear with out a doubt a would recommend a Ford 9".
 
  #3  
Old 04-22-2004, 05:52 PM
PJS55's Avatar
PJS55
PJS55 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Blenheim, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its not a good idea to discuss Ch%@y motors here and you may get a unamimous recommendation to go Ford in a Ford. I feel that a "girlie" Ford small block is entirely adequate in an F-100 and a 5.0 with a T5 manual from a Mustang would do the job nicely especially if you are considering EFI. I believe that an 8.8 rear out of any late model Ford would do the job as well unless you plan on visiting the drag strip on a regular basis. Then a 9" would be the choice.
 

Last edited by PJS55; 04-22-2004 at 05:53 PM. Reason: spelling
  #4  
Old 04-22-2004, 06:08 PM
tlb's Avatar
tlb
tlb is offline
Elder User

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: East Palestine, Ohio
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a 48 F1 with a 302, C4 auto, 9" rear. Good combo with this truck. Lots of after
market parts, runs good.
 
  #5  
Old 04-25-2004, 01:15 AM
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Fomoko1 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,663
Received 1,351 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Ford engine in your Ford truck is the only proper way to go. I am putting a 302 in my 56 Mercury with a front suspention from a 80 Mercury car, C4 and a 9 inch rear end from a 59 Ford 1/2 ton.
 
  #6  
Old 04-25-2004, 10:30 PM
DS02F250's Avatar
DS02F250
DS02F250 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 2,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'59 also w/ a "girly" 302 that's built (hence the truck's name: Butch). AOD tranny, 9" rear with 3.50 gears.
 
  #7  
Old 04-26-2004, 01:55 PM
Jag Red 54's Avatar
Jag Red 54
Jag Red 54 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Valley Center, CA
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
54 with a 289/c4 out of a 67 Mustang. When I see a Ford truck with a ch**y motor I think "this guy went cheap." It may not be the case, but that is still what I think. Also, for some reason, the chevy motors seem to all run very rich. As they drive through the cruis-ins their exhaust is lethal. Go with a ford. Be proud Blue. John
 
  #8  
Old 04-27-2004, 12:59 AM
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Fomoko1 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,663
Received 1,351 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Originally Posted by Jag Red 54
54 with a 289/c4 out of a 67 Mustang. When I see a Ford truck with a ch**y motor I think "this guy went cheap." It may not be the case, but that is still what I think. Also, for some reason, the chevy motors seem to all run very rich. As they drive through the cruis-ins their exhaust is lethal. Go with a ford. Be proud Blue. John
These guys do go cheap with a generic motor. Nothing bugs me more than Ford tuff with ch**y stuff. Just ruins what could have been perfect.
 
  #9  
Old 04-27-2004, 07:32 AM
Woodsman_30350's Avatar
Woodsman_30350
Woodsman_30350 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Comfort, TX
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
agree with the Ford in Ford view but I was just exploring all options. I found a nice 289 with C4. Do you think that would be sufficient versus a 302? How many horsepower does the 289 have?
 
  #10  
Old 04-27-2004, 09:38 AM
Jag Red 54's Avatar
Jag Red 54
Jag Red 54 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Valley Center, CA
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm not sure on the HP rating of both engines. I would suppose that the 302 would have a few extra. My 289 runs real good and will chirp the tires without much effort. Both engines are almost twins of each other. I doubt that you could tell the difference in the way they run. Putting a lot of HP in these trucks is often frustrating for the proud new owner of the mongo-sized engine. Without weight in the rear to keep the tires from burning off, they are too light. Many a post on FTE have asked for help with things like traction bars, etc. For general driving, the 289/302 is fine in my book. If you don't mind buying the extra fuel, then go for a 351. If money is no object, then the sky is the limit: 428, 429, 460, blower, etc. They will all fit. The big blocks will require a much better cooling system as well as a bigger fuel tank. Good luck, John
 

Last edited by Jag Red 54; 04-27-2004 at 09:42 AM. Reason: grammer
  #11  
Old 04-28-2004, 12:33 AM
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Fomoko1 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,663
Received 1,351 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Originally Posted by Woodsman_30350
agree with the Ford in Ford view but I was just exploring all options. I found a nice 289 with C4. Do you think that would be sufficient versus a 302? How many horsepower does the 289 have?
If you want a little better fuel economy and power go for a 5.0 from a 89-95 Mustang. You can run it with the fuel injection or convert to a
carb if you don`t want to mess with the computer wiring. Like this motor in my 88 Cobra Mustang, lots of power and up to 27 mph.
 




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 AM.