1968 F250 Rear End
#3
#4
If you have the heavy duty rear, it is not a Ford 9". In that case, the switch to limited slip is much harder, but not difficult. There are tons of companys that supply what you need. Putting the guts in and adjusting pre-load in a Dana is not trivial. If you don't want to try it, I'm sure that there are shops around you that will do it.
#5
Originally Posted by 67and71_Carl
If you have the heavy duty rear, it is not a Ford 9". In that case, the switch to limited slip is much harder, but not difficult. There are tons of companys that supply what you need. Putting the guts in and adjusting pre-load in a Dana is not trivial. If you don't want to try it, I'm sure that there are shops around you that will do it.
F250s have the Dana 60.
There are many lockers and lmiited slip diferential upgrades available. But, there may be fewer depending on how many splines are on your axles.
My 69 F250 dana 60 with 4.10 gears has 16 spline axles. About all I could easily find was detroit soft locker at 4WheelParts.com, it's a great part but cost about $550 plus $260 to install.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by jambroson
GTex,
You are killing me. That is depressing. My wife is going to leave me.
I am going to have to think about this. I just dropped a 428 in my truck and I can hardly keep from spinning that one lousy rear wheel.
Josh
You are killing me. That is depressing. My wife is going to leave me.
I am going to have to think about this. I just dropped a 428 in my truck and I can hardly keep from spinning that one lousy rear wheel.
Josh
I just got my 390 going and can't wait (Ha!) to see my gas mileage.
#9
I pulled out the Fuel Efficient 390 with a 2bbl because I don't care about gas mileage.
I will agree wih you. I ran a 390 in my T Bird and got close to 18 mpg. I put this 428 in the T Bird and could not get over 12. Maybe it was me.
I can see where things are going with this truck. I am going to have close to $10,000 in it if I am not careful.
Josh
I will agree wih you. I ran a 390 in my T Bird and got close to 18 mpg. I put this 428 in the T Bird and could not get over 12. Maybe it was me.
I can see where things are going with this truck. I am going to have close to $10,000 in it if I am not careful.
Josh
#10
#11
Originally Posted by Torque1st
Remember a truck is a SYSTEM! All of the parts have to be designed to work together or you will end up with an inefficient vehicle with bad fuel mileage and driveability problems.
#12
You are right!
Mileage is not my main concern. Power is!
I like the idea of a system, but it is hard to justify the expense all at once.
Paint, FPA Headers with dual exhuast, new Rear End and wheels/tires could get expensive.
I think I like the idea of concrete. Maybe a couple stock 2bbl manifolds would work also.
Josh
Mileage is not my main concern. Power is!
I like the idea of a system, but it is hard to justify the expense all at once.
Paint, FPA Headers with dual exhuast, new Rear End and wheels/tires could get expensive.
I think I like the idea of concrete. Maybe a couple stock 2bbl manifolds would work also.
Josh
#13
#15
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bigbruce
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
04-16-2017 06:01 PM
GeneStoner
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
10
01-20-2005 11:21 PM