1997 F350 VS 1999 or 2000 PS
#1
1997 F350 VS 1999 or 2000 PS
For those of you who have had both (or all three), what are the advantages of the newer Powerstroke F350 crewcab 4X4 over the 97 models. I have found 97's with similar miles as other 99 or 2000 models with asking prices $3000-7000 less on the 97.
Is the ride and braking that much better? Do the 4R100 tranys hold up much better than the 97 E4OD. From what I've read here the fuel mileage is likely to be as good and the power about the same. What should I consider before buying a 97 over a 99 or 2000, besides the looks, I like them both.
I only drive my truck 4000-5000 a year so I don't want an expensive truck depreciating in the driveway but I want to move up to something smoother and more reliable than my 1985 PU.
To get into my price range (17000-22000) it appears I'll be getting something with around 100000 miles on it.
Is the ride and braking that much better? Do the 4R100 tranys hold up much better than the 97 E4OD. From what I've read here the fuel mileage is likely to be as good and the power about the same. What should I consider before buying a 97 over a 99 or 2000, besides the looks, I like them both.
I only drive my truck 4000-5000 a year so I don't want an expensive truck depreciating in the driveway but I want to move up to something smoother and more reliable than my 1985 PU.
To get into my price range (17000-22000) it appears I'll be getting something with around 100000 miles on it.
#2
Sounds like for your situation I would go with the '97 if you only plan to drive it 4-5000 miles a year, since it is cheaper. They would be very similar in all aspects. I think the 99 and newer engines would have a little more power, but probably not enough to make a difference in your situation. Personally, I like the new super duty looks, and my 350 rides better than my old '90 F-150. Just my 2 cents.
#3
I had a 96 before I got my current 99. The auto trans was a pos imo but I have the 6 speed now so I can't compare. I like deciding what gear it needs to be in and taking advantage of the diesel rather than driving it around at the governor all the time when it sees a hill. The older ones have 60 fronts and the 99-01 have a 50 with crappy unit bearings that a lot of people have problems with but I haven't yet. I had 38's on the 96 and 38's on this one. The older ones don't have an intercooler so don't make quite as much power as the Superduties.
#5
I think the ride is a little better in the SD, probably not so much to justify cost difference though, On major thing that I like about the SD is the tow mirrors, man are they sweet, the newer mirrors, 03' I believe, will telescop in and out, that way you don't look like a Dodge, I mean a Dumbo Elephant.
Serious though, the tow mirrors are excellent while towing, easy to see behind the trailer as well as to the sides. However If you don't tow, then it doesn't matter. my .02
Serious though, the tow mirrors are excellent while towing, easy to see behind the trailer as well as to the sides. However If you don't tow, then it doesn't matter. my .02
#7
Trending Topics
#8
My friend, get a 2001 if you can. No guessing on the add ons if you want too. This guy in my unit has one and I really like the truck. If you can find a standard shift get it! Don't let anybody fool you about the automatics. They all suck. If you want to spend the extra cash, you can get a bullet proof tranny for pulling, but it you just plan to enjoy the vehicle then leave it alone. I agree with RR. The standard is the way to go and makes full use out of the T444E. Just my couple. Make sure you do your research on the one you pick.
#9
Originally posted by horsecop
My friend, get a 2001 if you can. No guessing on the add ons if you want too.
My friend, get a 2001 if you can. No guessing on the add ons if you want too.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Heavy_metal-2000
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
46
06-24-2016 05:17 PM