Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Bronco > 1966 - 1977 Early Broncos
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1966 - 1977 Early Broncos SPONSORED BY:

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-24-2004, 10:12 AM
FERacing66 FERacing66 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Jackassville
Posts: 1,354
FERacing66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Talking The Ultimate Question... Bronco v.s jeep!!!!

hey im wondering which one is more capable? ive heared that jeep is the best off roader. but im not so sure those old broncos kick butt! what do you guys think? whats the most extreme off road adventure youve expeirenced?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-24-2004, 03:12 PM
jlong1974 jlong1974 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: colorado
Posts: 52
jlong1974 is starting off with a positive reputation.
You did read the title of the forum, right?

james
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-24-2004, 04:36 PM
68 351 bronc 68 351 bronc is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Colville
Posts: 911
68 351 bronc is starting off with a positive reputation.
FEracing, you might want to try the FORD vs compition forum.
__________________
2001 F250 V-10 auto XLT 4X4

68 Bronco GT40 351w, NV3550 5sp, sweet!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2004, 08:17 AM
FERacing66 FERacing66 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Jackassville
Posts: 1,354
FERacing66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
sorry about that. ill use the other forum.
__________________
1966 F100
Twin I Beam
4spd

Custom Built by FERacing66

352FE V8
Holley PowerShot Air Cleaner
Holley 600 4brl Carb
Ford 4brl Intake
Crane PowerMAX Cam (901)
Headers

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2004, 04:21 PM
buzziscrazy2 buzziscrazy2 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OxFord Wisc
Posts: 195
buzziscrazy2 is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
A Feep..........
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2004, 07:59 PM
racsan's Avatar
racsan racsan is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: central ohio
Posts: 1,846
racsan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.racsan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
i'll vote ford! ive had both, a 85 cj-7 and a 71 bronco, the jeep had a 258 I-6, light-duty 4-spd (no creeper) dana 300 and the gearing im not shure of ,but it was in the range of 2.73- 3.08 had to use low range to pull a 14 ft alum boat out of the boat ramp. the bronco had a 302-2V, 3-on-the-tree, dont know what transfer case it was, had a console shifter with a t-handle that remided me of a ford pinto auto-shifter, manual hubs, 9-inch rear end and 4.10 gearing. the jeep was always blowing a u-joint somwhere, i replaced them all by the time i had it the first year, it was cold in the winter,underpowered and overpriced. the bronco, though it was well worn, always fired right up, was liveable in the winter, and i paid only 800 bucks for it. the only thing bad about it was having four-wheel drum brakes with no power booster, talk about anticipating stops! lask of power steering didnt bother me, even when i switched to 31-11.50 tires. i hated when i had to part with it. i would love to own another some day. i would never have another jeep.
__________________
'93 Ranger Supercab,4.0L, "the green machine" http://www.myspace.com/small_dog_trucking
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/321686...er-regular-cab
I have determined that every last Automotive Engineer is an atheist.......it is quite apparent that not a single one believes in intelligent design
http://www.therangerstation.com/foru...d.php?t=148057
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2004, 07:51 PM
jmms jmms is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 45
jmms is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have owned a 86 CJ-7, a 91 Wrangler, a 1997 Wrangler, and a 2000 Wrangler in the past and my early Bronco is a better built truck for off-roading hands down! The dam Jeep's brake down on the trails to much!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2004, 06:34 PM
rdnkjeeper rdnkjeeper is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13
rdnkjeeper is starting off with a positive reputation.
I haven't had an old Bronco, but my 90 Wrangler is mostly! So I have a FEEP!!!! Have a 302 out of a pick up and a Bronco c4/20. Soon some Ford axles will be under it.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2004, 09:27 PM
dk5122 dk5122 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 883
dk5122 is starting off with a positive reputation.
"The Early Bronco"....Thats all a Jeep is trying to be when it grows up.... I read that somewhere and just can't let it go..lol...
__________________
Dan's toys
76 Bronco V-8 36's
02 F-250 XLT Ext. Cab 4x4 35's
06 Mustang GT Vert
07 Escape 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2004, 02:18 AM
wyldstallyn73 wyldstallyn73 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 650
wyldstallyn73 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I understand why there are so many built up jeeps-they are an excellent configuration to start with, but the only way they are better in stock form than an early bronco is front and rear overhang. Jeeps are cursed with wimpy axles and transmissions. Broncos came with good stout parts-the kind of stuff you have to swap into a jeep if you want to do anything other than pavement cruising.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2004, 11:02 PM
broncoman66 broncoman66 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, Illinois
Posts: 164
broncoman66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have a 66 Bronco and a 79 Jeep Cherokee. The jeep is full size, not a CJ, but atleast it has D44's front and rear, a T15 3 speed, which is a very heavy duty trans, it was even used in Jeep 3/4 ton pick ups. And a Dana 20 'case. But, it isn't as small as my Bronco, so not a completely fair comparison. I always tell Jeep people that own CJ's or even Wrangler's to just get on the creeper and look under my Bronco (which has been updated with D44 front and big bearing 9" rear, all stock 74 Bronco stuff) and then look under a CJ7. Early Bronco's have a superior frame, better driveshafts, better rear end,( I can't dispute Jeep's Dana 30 front end because up until early 70's Bronco used a Dana 30 as well, but at least Ford figured out that was bad), a better low range out of the Bronco's Dana 20 case, 2.46 : 1 versus 2.03 :1 in the Jeeps Dana 20. CJ frames are notorious for excessive flex if used hard and in turn leads to cracked bodies. The Bronco frame is much more rigid. Both Jeeps and Broncos came with crappy ratios in their 3 speed manuals. Jeep did at least offer the T18 4 speed with granny low. I will give them credit for that. One thing they both share is that they both will rust like crazy. I hate to say it, but I do kind of like them both. Obviously, I own both! However, no one really notices my Cherokee, my Bronco gets looks and compliments.
A lot of Jeepers say that the Willys Jeep won WWII, well I say to that, Look at the facts, Ford made more Jeeps in WWII that Willys' did!! I say that is why they held up so well!

Mike
66 Bronco 5.0 SEFI 3 speed
79 Cherokee 258 3 speed
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2004, 12:27 AM
2003 mcs 2003 mcs is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: DTW
Posts: 52
2003 mcs is starting off with a positive reputation.
broncoman66 I would notice your FSJ! When I bought my Gladiator I was surprised that the trucks frame (after engine) was an open c-channel. I then looked at my brothers 69 Bronco frame........boxed!! Talk about a strong frame. I would also agree old Bronco are better than old CJ's.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2004, 01:49 PM
Johnboy_BoomerSooner's Avatar
Johnboy_BoomerSooner Johnboy_BoomerSooner is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cameron, OK
Posts: 576
Johnboy_BoomerSooner is starting off with a positive reputation.
Classic bronco by far... all of the "Good Jeeps" out there usually aren't Jeeps at all. They usually have big dana axles robbed out of something, and I typically see them with chevy powerplants, just a Jeep body. I did have an old J10 that was a good old truck, but it was an AMC mis-match...lol Dodge 360 and a TF727 tranny, Chevy heavy half axles, GM ignition and powersteering, ford donated an AC compressor and some other misc. stuff. What a crazy ride to work on... I still have nightmares, lol. But the new wrangler and rubicon are pretty capable vehicles.
__________________
1985 Ford Bronco - 4.9L I-6
Offy SP Intake, Edlebrock 600 cfm 4bbl, LT Headers
Tremec 4 Speed... May You Rest In Pieces You Turd
Locked D44 TTB front - 8.8 rear
3" body 6" susp. lift - 38.5x14.5 Super Swamper TSL-SX's
My Supermotors Page
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2004, 02:36 PM
74ExplorerHalfcab 74ExplorerHalfcab is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southeast Ky.
Posts: 51
74ExplorerHalfcab is starting off with a positive reputation.
BRONCO the Best?

Jeep vs. Early Bronco.

I don't really know which are better Jeeps or Broncos. It all depends on what you want. I have both. The primary reason I bought my Grand Cherokee was that I needed a 4-door kid hauler that I knew would be capable off road (in the future I may actually want to wheel it, now it's too nice). I think it's head and shoulders above anything else offered in a smaller utility by GM (get Real), Dodge (too Fat), or Ford (too Soft). It's the only 4x4 sport utility that offers solid Dana axles. The only other 4x4's I would consider would have been an Xterra (too top heavy) or Four Runner (too underpowered).

I could have bought just another CJ (semi-cool), YJ (ugly), or TJ (underpowered) but why? I don't plan on modifying anything out the hilt nor do I plan on entering any rock crawling championships.

The Early Bronco offers the best of all worlds. It's Strong, Capable, Unique, and Beautiful. It's a basic vehicle with no gizmo's gadgets or unneeded do-dads. It is a true "utility" vehicle. It has the Ideal wheelbase (note that Jeep just came out with an extended wheelbase wrangler).

My first Bronco was an 88 full size. It's a great handling full size vehicle with a lot of torque and the only thing that would even come close might be a full size Blazer. It's only limited by its departure angle and its twin traction beam Dana44 (witch is yet to cause one minutes problem).

One of these days Ford might realize that there are people out there who desire a medium size two door vehicle with V8 power, solid axles, and a boxed frame. Please spare us from independent suspensioned, electric shift transfer cased, pseudo, car based wanna be 4x4's. The Escape would have been ultra cool had it been placed on a frame with solid axles a real transfer case. The diesel thing in the new Bronco might be cool but please give something close to the original as possible.

Hey here is an idea. Let Ford or any other manufacturer offer something basic like a Bronco with no cloth or leather upholstery, with removable doors and top, and solid axles. It doesn't need power locks or windows, keyless entry, or a DVD player. Oh and sell it to us under $20k. They could do it but there is way too much profit in all the things we don't really need. Where are the real 4x4's of the 21st century? Oh well I guess in 20 years we will all be driving a TJ and that’s not as bad as an Element, Highlander, or Trailblazer.

My advise is go find a nicer 78-79 full size bronco while the prices are low. They are great trucks that were built by men for men. And will one day be as sought after as Fords other classic 4x4.
__________________
71 Bronco U15
73 Bronco U15
74 Bronco U14
78 Bronco Ranger
88 Bronco Eddie Bauer

Last edited by 74ExplorerHalfcab; 05-17-2004 at 02:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2014, 10:10 PM
Muddn7 Muddn7 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SE New Mexico
Posts: 6
Muddn7 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Bronco or Jeep, long story of growing up...

I have always loved the off-road sport, and just getting away from the norm. I had a fair addiction to off-road magazines 20 years ago as a teenager. Here are the vehicles and steps I have made concerning the 2:
At:
16-1974 Bronco, 302/C4/Spicer 20/PS...
18-1979 CJ-5, 258/T150/Dana 20/PS...
19-1987 Bronco, 302/E4OD/TTB 44/8" rear
21-1979 Bronco, 400M/NP435/44/9" rear
26-1973 and 74 CJ5's/258 and 304/3spd. trans/30 frt./44 rears

Sold both for my newest toy at the time:
1973 Ford Bronco, 302, 3spd., Spicer 20, 44 front, 9" rear... My Changes:
351W/RV Cam/650 Holley/Dual Flow water pump, LUK clutch, NP435, 4:56.1 gears, Detroit lockers, superior axle shafts, and the list goes on and on... I use mine for toying on Rocks in NM. I pull Jeeps out on just about every occasion that I go. I have the weight, power, and strength to carry the tools. If I get stuck (once since I moved here), it took two vehicles to get me out. I am street legal, and love my old toy. I have purchased 2 other Broncos since then. Both for parts and when I get off of the rocks.
My previous friend Has been a Jeep fan since I met him. Started with a 76 304 powered CJ7, once we replaced his axle shafts in the Rear 20, and got him capable, he required a granny gear....The list then went on and on. He has since owned a 3.8, and a 3.6 jeep. He now has neither, and is onto his next step.
I like My Early Bronco addiction, and plan to hold onto them as long as the wife lets me. Build it the way you want.... Just remember; my Bronco requires a lot less upgrading in parts than any Jeep, and has been known as the capable recovery vehicle...
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2014, 10:10 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Bronco > 1966 - 1977 Early Broncos

Tags
1970, body, bronco, cherokee, cj, compare, compared, contrast, ford, frame, jeep, jeeps, trucks, u15, underpowered, vs, wheelbase

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5.8L timing set number? rockcrawler_101 Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 4 08-16-2013 05:36 PM
87 Bronco value waldo jeepin 1978 - 1996 Big Bronco 1 06-02-2013 10:40 PM
steering box hotrod351 1966 - 1977 Early Broncos 39 04-01-2013 09:31 PM
Looking to Purchase a Bronco...Need Some Info 2wheelmatt 1978 - 1996 Big Bronco 6 09-30-2012 03:08 PM
1978-79 BRONCO BEST TRAIL OFF ROAD RIG?? robjs111 1978 - 1996 Big Bronco 10 07-25-2012 08:45 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup