Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Performance and General Engine Building
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read




Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2004, 09:09 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 27
akmud is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'm starting to see that. I am going to take pics of the vacum guage and scan the cam specs and send them in.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2004, 11:53 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 363
rainbowATF is starting off with a positive reputation.
vacuum readings

Study the following website and compare to the vacuum readings you measure and observe.

http://www.users.bigpond.com/ergoff/vac1.htm
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-24-2004, 03:11 AM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 27
akmud is starting off with a positive reputation.
Talking

Below is my super ford web site. I have the pics of the vacuum guage and the cam specs listed under rough idle. Check them out and tell me what you think.


my superford site
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-24-2004, 10:28 AM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
jwtaylor is starting off with a positive reputation.
The first thing I noticed, usually people mention when they convert to roller camshafts.

You do have roller lifters, correct?


CS-195R which is the cam you listed is a roller camshaft.

I could only find lobe C/L 112 so I will assume the intake and exhaust has a 112 centerline, (intake C/L + exhaust C/L divided by 2 = lobe seperation), which is 112 lobe seperation.

Are you sure this camshaft was recommended for speed density, 112-114 lobe seperation is usually recommended for stock speed density efi, but if the camshaft isn't designed to make x amount of vacuum, then your efi system will do what you have explained.

That or you have a vacuum leak, check all your vacuum lines.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-24-2004, 01:03 PM
DW2455's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 1,486
DW2455 is starting off with a positive reputation.
The cam you have installed is too big for speed density, here are the specs for a CompCams cam specificaly ground for a SD system,
cam # 31-255-5
Grind # XE250H-14
valve lift: int- .462 exh- .474
dur. @ .50 int- 206 exh- .216
LSA 114
RPM range 1000 - 5200
Look at this and compare the differences, to make your motor run right you have to options, tear it down and change the cam and lifter out, or convert to Mas air, if its within you budget i would sugest converting to mas air, hope this helps GOOD LUCK! DW
__________________


MY Web site have A L@@K
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2004, 02:57 AM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 27
akmud is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well I guess you would say its bad news and bad news. How much would it be to convert to mass air? Is there a kit somewhere?
Oh, thanks for the bad news hahaha At least I know now. Got tired of everyone telling me that I had a vacum leak, when I have checked everything to do with vacum.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2004, 11:25 AM
DW2455's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 1,486
DW2455 is starting off with a positive reputation.
summit racing and jegs both sell a conversion kit, there kinda pricey but it worth the conversion, a few people have gotton the parts from the boneyard and re wired and soldered there own harneses but my under standing is that it time consuming but can be done for less money. do a serch on the fourm here there have been several people do the conversion and numerous discusions on the subject. Good luck DW
__________________


MY Web site have A L@@K
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2004, 11:31 AM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
jwtaylor is starting off with a positive reputation.
Another option, if your not looking to upgrade the motor any time soon, you could opt for a chip. later
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2004, 12:35 PM
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 7,389
EPNCSU2006 has a good reputation on FTE. EPNCSU2006 has a good reputation on FTE.
Doesn't a '95 351 have a E4OD transmission? Summit and Jeg's won't have a kit for trucks with that transmission. People like Pro-M might, but it's over $1000. Chip might be the best and cheapest way to get it running right, as jwtaylor said.
__________________
Eric

'87 F150 302 manual 4sp overdrive 4x2
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2004, 01:36 PM
DW2455's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 1,486
DW2455 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally posted by jwtaylor
Another option, if your not looking to upgrade the motor any time soon, you could opt for a chip. later
the problem here is eratic vacuum and idle, cause: he installed as cam that to big for SPEED DENSITY so a chip will be of little help at this point.
__________________


MY Web site have A L@@K
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2004, 03:39 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
jwtaylor is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally posted by DW2455
the problem here is eratic vacuum and idle, cause: he installed as cam that to big for SPEED DENSITY so a chip will be of little help at this point.

Really, I was under the impression that a chip could be reporgramed to provide the proper fuel map, in order for the engine to react to different variables, such as lower vacuum properly, and smooth out the idle. Then again I am not 100%, but that was the impression I was getting. Let me know, as I am learning slowly the ways of the efi. later
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2004, 03:58 PM
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 7,389
EPNCSU2006 has a good reputation on FTE. EPNCSU2006 has a good reputation on FTE.
It's too big for stock speed density. Hence with a chip, it could be tuned to work with the cam.
__________________
Eric

'87 F150 302 manual 4sp overdrive 4x2
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2004, 04:19 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
jwtaylor is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thats what I thought, later
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2004, 08:03 PM
DW2455's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 1,486
DW2455 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Dont get me wrong, i'm not saying it wount help, but even with a new chip it's stillvery specific as to how much it can compensate for, his money but i dont think just a chip is gona compensate for .512 inch lift on the exhaust, but who knows DW
__________________


MY Web site have A L@@K
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2004, 09:34 PM
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 7,389
EPNCSU2006 has a good reputation on FTE. EPNCSU2006 has a good reputation on FTE.
The chip would be custom burned to account for the cam that is in the engine. The computer wouldn't have to compensate.
__________________
Eric

'87 F150 302 manual 4sp overdrive 4x2
Reply With Quote


Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. are not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.