Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

GT40 vs corvette

  #16  
Old 02-03-2004, 01:24 PM
BrentKasson's Avatar
BrentKasson
BrentKasson is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, KS
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You are comparing a N/A LS6 to a supercharged 5.4. As for souping up the GT-40, you could add a twin turbo setup, a better pulley as mentioned, nitrous, or anything else. And you could do the same with the vette. How much power would that all aluminum 5.4 make without the Eaton supercharger on it? Would it make 405 hp? Just food for thought
 
  #17  
Old 02-03-2004, 01:57 PM
bigsnag's Avatar
bigsnag
bigsnag is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pryor
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Robert Yates is producing 4.6L DOHC motors with 11.0:1 and a max valve lift of .500 and he's getting 500 hp out of them. I would suppose that you could get quite a bit more out of a NA 5.4, especially if you bump the cam lift up to around .700.
 
  #18  
Old 02-04-2004, 01:28 PM
95CobraR's Avatar
95CobraR
95CobraR is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sandy Springs, GA
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 2004 Ford GT build date is 4-29-04. It was announced as 500hp (plus) with 500lb-ft of torque (400@ 2000rpm). It has a 356-T6 aluminum block, forged pistons, forged rods, and a 12psi Eaton twin-screw blower. It lists for $139,000 (plus delivery, tax, title, and dealer mark-up).

The new C6 is a 2005 with 400hp. The new C6 Z06 is only a rumor just as the Mustang Cobra/Bullitt/Shelby/et al. No flame from me, the new vette (and old Z06) are great sports cars. The are less than half the price of a GT.

I'd still pick the GT.
 
  #19  
Old 02-04-2004, 07:12 PM
Ev2Demon's Avatar
Ev2Demon
Ev2Demon is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The C6 Z06 is not a rumor, It will most certainly be built. It just hasn't been introduced yet. I know for a fact that it will have a 3 valve OHV 6.3 liter delivering 500 HP. I've seen the motor first hand.

Acording to people in the know, they are currently testing the cars on various tracks. The C6 Z06 will differ in look slightly from the base C6, and will have an aluminum frame for a few hundred pound savings as well. It will make its debut at the 2005 NAIAS in Detroit.
 
  #20  
Old 02-05-2004, 11:06 PM
hoxiii's Avatar
hoxiii
hoxiii is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wanna see chevy come back out with a big block vette. Back with the 427 L88 they were pushing 430 CLAIMED hp (it was actually closer to the 600 mark, they underrated the motor by almost 2000 RPM). Even taking into account a 10-15% parasitic loss your still running at about 550 hp at the dirt. 2 valves, pushrods, and a four barrel. Take that same motor, fuel inject it, use a computerized flow bench to redesign the heads, bring it up to about 14:1, leave it with 2 valves and pushrods, and i'm sure it'd be hitting the 700 mark no problem. If they were to do this there would be no more "but it has no torque". I don't see it happening, but if they did i'd buy one in an instant.

Justin
 
  #21  
Old 02-05-2004, 11:36 PM
Ev2Demon's Avatar
Ev2Demon
Ev2Demon is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's no way any gas motor will survive on todays crappy pump gas with 14:1 comp. With todays spark management and aluminum heads with decent quench characteristics, you might see 11:1, but that is pushing it and the computer will have the timing set pretty soft most of the time.

The new small blocks in the Vettes are bad *** motors. Old School pushrod tech meets new age tuning and computers. Makes for one hell of a combo.
 
  #22  
Old 02-06-2004, 11:41 AM
4rdsrock's Avatar
4rdsrock
4rdsrock is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much horse power does the Gt40 have?
 
  #23  
Old 02-06-2004, 11:43 AM
4rdsrock's Avatar
4rdsrock
4rdsrock is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: GT40 vs corvette

Originally posted by COBRAjrb
what do u guys think is better 2004 GT40 or the 2004 corvette? i personaly think the GT40 rocks \m/
the 2004 gt40 corvett's suck.
 
  #24  
Old 02-06-2004, 04:05 PM
hoxiii's Avatar
hoxiii
hoxiii is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
alot of factory 4 bangers are running 12 and 13:1 with GOOD computer management. What they do is find the balance between timing and compression to the point of diminishing returns. They jack up the compression while letting the computer retard timing unil they quit gaining power on regular unleaded. That's where they set the compression. (at least on performance models)

Justin
 
  #25  
Old 02-06-2004, 06:06 PM
bigsnag's Avatar
bigsnag
bigsnag is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pryor
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I live in Missouri, hoxii. You'll have to "show me". I'd like you to tell me which 4 bangers run 12:1 and 13:1, preferably with links. Thanks.
 
  #26  
Old 02-06-2004, 06:17 PM
Ev2Demon's Avatar
Ev2Demon
Ev2Demon is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree. I show me an example of a production engine with over 11.5:1, then I'll believe it.

The Honda S2000, which has the most highly tuned N/A 4 cylinder built, has 11.1:1. I don't know of any higher than that.
 

Last edited by EV2DEMON; 02-06-2004 at 06:34 PM.
  #27  
Old 02-06-2004, 09:16 PM
COBRAjrb's Avatar
COBRAjrb
COBRAjrb is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4 bangers suck they sound like crap and i doubt that honda is stock. anyways this is a gt40 verse corvette forum lol. ide like to c that s2000 run against a stock gt40
 
  #28  
Old 02-06-2004, 09:20 PM
Ev2Demon's Avatar
Ev2Demon
Ev2Demon is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I'm not a big fan of 4 bangers my self, though that doesn't mean I don't appreciate a well engineered motor when I see one.

The 4cyl. S2000 has 11.1:1 stock, from the factory. It might not run with a GT(40), but it will out run a V8 Mustang GT.
 
  #29  
Old 02-07-2004, 03:11 AM
95CobraR's Avatar
95CobraR
95CobraR is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sandy Springs, GA
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: GT40 vs corvette

Originally posted by 4rdsrock
the 2004 gt40 corvett's suck.
When did a Chevy Corvette mate with a Ford GT?

Note to 4rdsrock: The GT has 500hp and 500ft/lbs torque. The Corvette has 400hp. I guess the 2004 gt40 corvett has 450?
 
  #30  
Old 02-07-2004, 06:36 AM
towboat's Avatar
towboat
towboat is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The Ford GT cost twice as much"

Ok so when did true high performance vehicles become inexpensive?

Price doesn't matter with regards to the Ford GT...if you can afford to buy one you could enjoy driving it for years and then sell it for MORE than you paid for it when it was new. What does an original GT-40, Cobra, any Shelby or Boss Mustang sell for today compaired to it's original price?

Just imagine what the deaker's "adjusted market value" will be on a new Ford GT though!
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: GT40 vs corvette



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 AM.