2 barrel to 4 barrel questions
#2
#3
#4
No head modifications are needed. You would be just as well off with a 500cfm Edelbrock carb. With a stock engine, it will probably be better.
You would have to turn about 6900rpm to use 600 cfm in a 302. A 500cfm carb is capable of feeding a 302 up to 5800rpm, though a stock motor will probably see much over 4500.
Jimmy
You would have to turn about 6900rpm to use 600 cfm in a 302. A 500cfm carb is capable of feeding a 302 up to 5800rpm, though a stock motor will probably see much over 4500.
Jimmy
#6
Nope. Depending onwhat you want to do with this thing. If you go incresing valve sizes ans porting the heads, you will make more power, but it will be at a higher rpm and you will lose low end torque, which it what a heavy truck needs. A 302 doesn't hav alot to lose anyway. I would suggest an Edelbrock Performer intake with a 500cfm Edelbrock carb. A set of headers and true dual exhaust with mufflers like Flowmaster, Dynomax, Borla, or something of that nature.
This will help the engine breathe better withiut sacrificing low end drivability. You lose velocity in the heads when they are ported and have larger valves. Unless you are building a healthy race engine, then it will hurt more than it will help.
So just go withthe carb,intake and recommended exhaust system an it shoud run a lot better.
Jimmy
This will help the engine breathe better withiut sacrificing low end drivability. You lose velocity in the heads when they are ported and have larger valves. Unless you are building a healthy race engine, then it will hurt more than it will help.
So just go withthe carb,intake and recommended exhaust system an it shoud run a lot better.
Jimmy
#7
Trending Topics
#8
touching on the same topic, i was planning on getting an intake assembly from an 84 mustang and bolting it to the 302 in my 83 F150. It wont be HIGH performance but it will be an inexpensive upgrade. From what i have read, the 302 in a 83 mustang has 175 HP stock. If anybody knows the stock specs for my engine, please pass it on. I was also wondering if i should upgrade to roller lifters, or should i even bother?
#9
#12
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
northdakota 67ford
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
06-03-2014 07:53 PM
ericford1984
Performance & General Engine Building
2
12-05-2011 08:47 PM
80 f-150
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
09-05-2011 11:47 PM
2002BLGT
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
6
11-12-2005 02:15 PM