Diesel Info
#16
#19
how about a yanmar? or a lugger?
why do we leave these out?
why not a case??
hmm???
answer me that!
also, i feel ford should have stuck with the baby PSD personally. i bet by '06, when it was needed, all the bugs would have been ironed out, and we all know the 6.0L is a bad ****, a baby psd would have been as well.
if FORD had a psd f150, i would own one of those instead of this 250. not to mention, ford could REALLY use the CAFE points a ~25mpg light truck would have gained.
why do we leave these out?
why not a case??
hmm???
answer me that!
also, i feel ford should have stuck with the baby PSD personally. i bet by '06, when it was needed, all the bugs would have been ironed out, and we all know the 6.0L is a bad ****, a baby psd would have been as well.
if FORD had a psd f150, i would own one of those instead of this 250. not to mention, ford could REALLY use the CAFE points a ~25mpg light truck would have gained.
#21
#22
#23
If ford is truly interested in the V6 or I6 light duty diesel program the only two companies that could possibly do it are Cummins and Detroit Diesel. Personally, Cummins builds a better motor than DD. They also have a motor in current production. DD stands to make a lot of money if they were given a contract.
On the other hand, a Volvo diesel is far better for a car or Ranger application. I can't imagine that Volvo could put together a light duty diesel in just two years.
It would be nice to see an in house diesel project.
On the other hand, a Volvo diesel is far better for a car or Ranger application. I can't imagine that Volvo could put together a light duty diesel in just two years.
It would be nice to see an in house diesel project.
#24
#26
What's up with that? I thought they bought a part of Cummins to start making their own diesels? I suppose they backed off that for financial reasons just like they backed off owning a big chunk of Harley. Ford was to own controlling stock of Harley by both of their 100th anniveraries, but they quietly changed their mind a year later.
#27
#28
Yeah thats all nice and purty, but JD cannot build a motor in two years. The 6.0 in current use has been around for almost 8 now, and look at the introdruction problems it faced (mostly Ford's fault).
It would be nice to see a JD under the hood, but they don't build an economical engine. They don't have a reason too. There aren't any restrictions on farm equipment.
It would be nice to see a JD under the hood, but they don't build an economical engine. They don't have a reason too. There aren't any restrictions on farm equipment.