Aluminum Head Options (Meller)
#1
Aluminum Head Options (Meller)
It's time to decide on a pair of aluminum heads for my 460 build.
I am planning a 460 bare block up build project to drop into my '79 F-350 SC 4x4. Naturally it will be a daily driver as well as focused on hauling heavy trailers fairly regularly.
I am attempting to make this general and informational reference for future readers with similar aluminum cylinder head questions.
I have been looking around and the contenders that I have found are the Ford Racing new and improved Super Cobra Jet heads, The Edelbrock Performer RPM heads, and the Blue Thunder heads. What are your opinions on these heads or others that I am unaware of. Thanks again for your time.
I am planning a 460 bare block up build project to drop into my '79 F-350 SC 4x4. Naturally it will be a daily driver as well as focused on hauling heavy trailers fairly regularly.
I am attempting to make this general and informational reference for future readers with similar aluminum cylinder head questions.
I have been looking around and the contenders that I have found are the Ford Racing new and improved Super Cobra Jet heads, The Edelbrock Performer RPM heads, and the Blue Thunder heads. What are your opinions on these heads or others that I am unaware of. Thanks again for your time.
#2
Well, I'll get a lot of flack about my choice but my Blue Thunders flow significantly better than anything I've worked with as far as stock Ford ports go (and I've done 4 sets this year). I did an older set of CJ's & practically removed the top of the port to get exhaust numbers even close to tolerable. The new SCJ's are better but the set here aren't THAT much better, even though everyone seems to think so. Haven't done any E-brocks but they don't look bad. As far as fit, function, & performance, unless I was squeezing all I could from a mill, I'd do the SCJ aluminum heads, headers will fit better than the BT's... it's a trade out for me. My 466 makes 717 on the dyno & I need all I can get. My opinion
#3
The new SCJ's are much improved over the old CJ aluminum heads. It's not all about peak CFM on heads. The SCJ's are great performers. They make a lot of power. There is a lot more to making power than just max CFM at max lift. Jon Kaase did a ton of research on the new SCJ heads. The main reason why they make more power, (at perhaps less flow) than other heads is the revised valve locations and angles. They did a lot of work to move the valves away from the cylinder wall and optimize the valve angles. That's something that can make a huge difference when on an engine but won't be detectable on a flowbench. If it were me, I'd go with a set of SCJ's and just blend the bowls and maybe lightly port the exhaust, while trying to not change the shape of the port. If you are wanting to do some pulling then you don't want to go hog-wild and are going to be interested in torque. Go with a 521 stroker and keep the ports small and you'll have all the power you need.
JJ
JJ
#4
#5
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#9
#10
429 SCJ
I'd say the ports on the CJ/SCJ are a little too big for low RPM torque in a 429. However, if you are talking a big inch engine it's a different story. 2000 RPM's in a 521 CID BBF is like 2500 RPM's in a 429. 3000 is like 3700 RPM's. As you can see you are moving a lot more air at lower RPM's in the bigger engine. I don't think you will lose any power by going to the bigger ports in a 460 or larger engine.