Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Performance & General Engine Building
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-28-2003, 02:05 PM
PhatCaprice's Avatar
PhatCaprice PhatCaprice is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 9
PhatCaprice is starting off with a positive reputation.
Any Ford V8's with the distributor in the rear?

Overheard a conversation that some dude knew some guy with a Ford V8 with the distributor in the back in the engine. One of the guys called bull on this and said that all the Ford V8's have them in the front. Then some moron said "unless he's got a chevy in that Ford truck.", blah blah blah. Got me to thinking though, Ford V8's aren't all about 302's, 351's and 460's which is what most people equate to when talking Fords right?. I know Ford made a load of different displacement V8's. So I ask the question of you all, were any Ford V8's designed with the distributor in the rear? I'm mostly a Chevy person myself and just recently started working on some Fords and am unfamilar with all the different Fords V8's out there, so bear with me. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-28-2003, 03:38 PM
jwtaylor jwtaylor is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
jwtaylor is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well FE, 385, cleveland,modified, windsor,even flat heads had distributors in the front as well as the 232 v-6 that was in some early 80's trucks, inline 6 on the side but that doesn't count. So unless there is one I don't know of then I would say that fellow had one of those chevy transplants, why??? Interesting question, later
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-28-2003, 08:40 PM
fordeverpower's Avatar
fordeverpower fordeverpower is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: iowa
Posts: 3,913
fordeverpower is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have never heard of such a thing on a ford.
__________________
Matt Drury
78 F100 390 2wd c6
79 F150 400 np435 4x4
79 f150 390 rip!
95 f150 4x4 351w
Avatar is Barry Rabotnick's emc motor!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-28-2003, 09:15 PM
FTE Ken's Avatar
FTE Ken FTE Ken is offline
Founder ... Stay Tuned
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Enjoying the real world.
Posts: 23,171
FTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputation
Ford's common Y-block V8 had the distributor in the back.
__________________
FTE Founder. Enjoying life, hitting the throttle and hearing my Ford squeal 'em....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-28-2003, 09:24 PM
jwtaylor jwtaylor is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
jwtaylor is starting off with a positive reputation.
There you go, learn something new everyday
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-28-2003, 09:26 PM
FTE Ken's Avatar
FTE Ken FTE Ken is offline
Founder ... Stay Tuned
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Enjoying the real world.
Posts: 23,171
FTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputation
On quick glance if you see it out of the corner of your eyes you do a double-take, thinking there's an off-brand engine under the hood.
__________________
FTE Founder. Enjoying life, hitting the throttle and hearing my Ford squeal 'em....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-03-2003, 12:50 PM
Capone Capone is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Monterey bay area
Posts: 647
Capone is starting off with a positive reputation.
Unless the engine was installed backwards....but then the truck would have to be front wheel drive?

just a possibility.
__________________
88 E. Bauer Bronco 5.8

List Mod's in Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-03-2003, 01:11 PM
jwtaylor jwtaylor is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
jwtaylor is starting off with a positive reputation.
Capone I think we agree. My main issue was you cannot convince me that it is cheaper or even close to being cheap building a ford engine versus chevy using off the shelf parts. I will even take this a little further aftermarket wise it comes close but still the chevy has ford money wise and in my opinion neither one has a superior design head of any kind over the other, if you want to compare technology vs cost to make X amount of hp then again ford looses. I just cannot understand for the life of me why ford feels that it demands the prices they ask for off the shelf parts, its ridiculous and the aftermarket supports this as well even more ridiculous. If it weren't for the 302 craze a person would be insane to even attempt to throw money on a sbf and even think in terms of budget it would be more like restoration money can you imagine the prices if the 302 mustang craze never happened? As mentioned by others if you take ford and chevy heads of the same compression and flow along with the same cam profile you are gonna get the same amount of hp/tq give or take a little, and you can bet the chevy would be a whole lot cheaper. Again I agree with what you say and I think we are close on opinions, but when it comes down to the arguement over which is better you cannot convince me ford made anything special with the 96 motors down versus chevy, and when it comes down to which is cheaper that adds injury to insult, because ford loses. Later
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-03-2003, 04:00 PM
71FoMoCo's Avatar
71FoMoCo 71FoMoCo is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 395
71FoMoCo is starting off with a positive reputation.
Y-Block Pics

Here are a few Y-Blocks. I believe they were fairly common in Thunderbirds back in the day...

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.
__________________
Mark

71 F-100 Sport Custom 390 C-6
94 Ranger XLT 4.0L
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-05-2003, 06:56 PM
1975 f150 360 1975 f150 360 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 86
1975 f150 360 is starting off with a positive reputation.
i was just in the junkyard today and believe it or not i found an old ford truck looked like it was in the early 60's it was a bigger ford truck i popped the hood and there was a red ford mottor with the distributor in the back it said FORD in big letters on the valve covers so yes there are fords out there with the distributor in the back



1875 ford 360
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-05-2003, 08:00 PM
Capone Capone is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Monterey bay area
Posts: 647
Capone is starting off with a positive reputation.
the ol 292-312 Y blocks eh?....haven't seen one of them for a looooong time
__________________
88 E. Bauer Bronco 5.8

List Mod's in Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-05-2003, 08:52 PM
kermmydog's Avatar
kermmydog kermmydog is offline
ALIEN FTE AZ CL
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OUTERSPACE, SOMEWHERE
Posts: 8,194
kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.
was just at the "Super Run 03" in Henderson Nv. Next door to Las Vegas And saw a few in fact 57 T-Bird with 312 2-4s. Haystacks no less.
__________________
Ford Space Ship to get to Earth
When Here:
1999 Ford P71
1995 Ford F150 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-05-2014, 06:33 PM
flowney's Avatar
flowney flowney is online now
Junior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 73
flowney is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kermmydog View Post
was just at the "Super Run 03" in Henderson Nv. Next door to Las Vegas And saw a few in fact 57 T-Bird with 312 2-4s. Haystacks no less.
Yes, indeed. I used to drag race with one of these dual four-barrel 312s in the late 60s - early 70s. Another fellow had the supercharged 312.

Back in that day, NHRA set up stock classes based upon a ratio of advertised horsepower and curb weight. The trick was to find a combo that was 1) on the edge of a class and 2) based on a grossly underrated horsepower figure. Chevrolet was extremely modest in advertised horsepower claims but these two Ford 312s were also lowballing their horsepower.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-06-2014, 09:05 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,243
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwtaylor View Post
Again I agree with what you say and I think we are close on opinions, but when it comes down to the arguement over which is better you cannot convince me ford made anything special with the 96 motors down versus chevy,
Well mister cheapskate chevy guy, you try and build a SBC with late '80's early '90's parts and tell me how many engines you need to collect before you find castings that aren't cracked and/or full of poorly melted recycled material. You won't find thin wall castings or recycled material in any Ford castings of this vintage so are you factoring that into the cost? And why is being the absolute cheapest the deciding factor in building an engine? I simply don't buy the argument that it is significantly cheaper anyway, yes you might be able to do it for $200-$300 less but what's that in the big scheme of things.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-02-2014, 01:06 AM
krooser's Avatar
krooser krooser is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 505
krooser is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conanski View Post
Well mister cheapskate chevy guy, you try and build a SBC with late '80's early '90's parts and tell me how many engines you need to collect before you find castings that aren't cracked and/or full of poorly melted recycled material. You won't find thin wall castings or recycled material in any Ford castings of this vintage so are you factoring that into the cost? And why is being the absolute cheapest the deciding factor in building an engine? I simply don't buy the argument that it is significantly cheaper anyway, yes you might be able to do it for $200-$300 less but what's that in the big scheme of things.
That knucklehead hasn't visited this joint for 8 years… good riddance.
__________________
Living the dream behind the Cheddar Curtain

'88 F-350 Crew Cab, 460 Fuel Squeezer
'97 Ram 1500, '99 Jeep Grand Cherokee. '90 Buick Park Ave. '52 Pontiac Catalina.
Plus a couple old dirt race cars.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 01:06 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Performance & General Engine Building

Tags
1957, back, block, chevy, disributor, dist, distributer, distributor, distributors, engine, engines, ford, motor, rear, v8

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wanting to build a 350-400hp street truck SuperDutyScaler 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 77 08-07-2014 11:58 AM
5.4 exhaust note (f150 vs superduty) justforkicks 1997 - 2003 F150 8 06-03-2014 05:51 PM
2001 5.4 Starting Issue biebs53 1997 - 2003 F150 2 11-15-2013 08:27 PM
1964 F100 Madrid1214 1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 7 08-11-2013 09:42 AM
Why did Ford use the Loadomatic up to '56? 46yblock Y-Block V8 (239, 272, 292, 312, 317, 341, 368) 2 05-02-2013 07:13 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup