Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van SPONSORED BY:

View Poll Results: What is normal fuel economy for a new 6.0 liter diesel ???
This pole has relevance to you? 42 67.74%
Fuel Economy of F250 6.0L diesel, who cares? 8 12.90%
The right question was asked? 7 11.29%
The right responses were obtained? 5 8.06%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-28-2003, 01:03 AM
shamblin123 shamblin123 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Outside of Toronto Canada
Posts: 6
shamblin123 is starting off with a positive reputation.
6.0 Liter Fuel Economy

Perhaps someone can help me out with a technical question about my F250 6.0L Truck. I put 35" LT315 75R-16 Toyo Cross-Country tires on my truck when it was one day old. I have about 7000 miles on it so far. The digital LED temperature/fuel-mileage/miles-to-empty guage shows I'm getting only 10-miles per gallon. If that is close to normal or actual, then I feel ripped off to get such horrible gas mileage. I was expecting around 13 to 15 mpg new and 18 to 20 mpg after about 35,000 miles (break-in).

I'm stumped, and so is the shop foreman at the Ford dealership. They can't reprogram my truck's computer because Ford's computer program software only goes up to size 285 tires. I'm just wondering if my tires are a 'big' contributer to my lousy fuel economy? Is 10-MPG normal for a new 6.0 liter diesel truck? I'm sure that the digital fuel economy readout may be somewhat skewed by the larger tires, but I can really tell that I'm sucking the fuel down.

My brother has a Black F250 7.3 liter diesel that looks almost identical to mine. However, he gets 17 mpg with his truck. Is there a solution to my delimna of lousy fuel economy? Is this normal? Everything on my 6.0L is completely stock with the exception of the 35" tires I mentioned and I also added a leaf to each 4 corners which raised it up about 2.5 to 3 inches.

Thank all of you for your comments.

Scott
scottshamblin(No Email Addresses In Posts!)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-28-2003, 05:34 PM
Skee Skee is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Carmel Valley,CA
Posts: 25
Skee is starting off with a positive reputation.
Stock tires 265 19.7 country roads
Skee
__________________
2003 F-250 4x4,6.0L. six speed tranny
IAFF LOCAL # 3733
http://community.webshots.com/user/skee7221
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-28-2003, 07:18 PM
eharman eharman is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 326
eharman is starting off with a positive reputation.
LT265's , stock, 17.6 mpg local driving.
__________________
2003 F250 PSD 4x4 XLT SC, Torqshift Tranny, 3:73 LS, FX4. LT 265's, Hog exhaust, 05/03 build date
SCT tranny tune by ID
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-28-2003, 11:21 PM
smcdonn smcdonn is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 42
smcdonn is starting off with a positive reputation.
265's, stock, runnin on the speed limmiter for almost a whole trip with a 16foot trailer full of 4 wheelers got about 12mpg. going easy unloaded I get about 15-16. Tires can make a fairly good change in fuel milage but surley the diesel doesn't notice them that bad. try an intake and an exhaust and see if that will get it up
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2003, 02:21 PM
jwdeats jwdeats is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 248
jwdeats is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
4x4, Crew Cab, Mixed Driving 70% local, 30% highway, I get 15.5 mpg. Stock tires.

I drive pretty conservatively, but I stomp the gas once every third day or so just to feel the rush of accelaration.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2003, 02:31 PM
amacki4353 amacki4353 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dade City,Fl.
Posts: 84
amacki4353 is starting off with a positive reputation.
F-350 SRW Crew Cab Fx4 6.0 King Ranch w/ 8000 miles average all miles driven 17.0 mpg. Would expect this to improve as mileage increases on the truck.
__________________
Senior User amacki4353
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2003, 06:53 PM
Daryl Hunter's Avatar
Daryl Hunter Daryl Hunter is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 2,195
Daryl Hunter is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I have a stock California model with the 5 speed transmission and 3.73 gearing. The truck now has 13000 miles on it.

Unloaded on the highway I have seen over 20 mpg driving at 75+ but average around 17.5 mpg on general highway use.

In town commuting 4 miles to work and back I get around 13 mpg because the truck never really gets warmed up or into high gear for any length of time, plus I climb a 400+ foot hill on the way.

I tow a 30' Weekend Warrior trailer with a typical truck and trailer gross weight of 18000 to 20000 lbs depending upon the number of toys and gals of water in the tanks.

On a trip this last weekend from San Diego, CA to Pinetop, AZ and back, I averaged 8.66 mpg. This was towing at speeds of 65 to 75 mph. As the speed increased, the mileage decreased - most likely due to the increased wind drag on the trailer.

I've seen over 10 mpg towing the trailer on some segments, but over the course of most trips, this mileage seems about par for towing this trailer.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2003, 07:15 PM
emilbanks emilbanks is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NorthEastern Pa.
Posts: 20
emilbanks is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have stock tires and less than a thousand miles and Im getting 17.5 MPG.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2003, 10:17 PM
Skee Skee is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Carmel Valley,CA
Posts: 25
Skee is starting off with a positive reputation.
Kinda looks like the handshaker transmission gets better mileage than the put in gear and stomp on it
transmission.
Skee
__________________
2003 F-250 4x4,6.0L. six speed tranny
IAFF LOCAL # 3733
http://community.webshots.com/user/skee7221
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-29-2003, 11:28 PM
myst myst is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 171
myst is starting off with a positive reputation.
My 6.0 has 295 tires with no cat or muffler and i am getting between 17 and 20 mpg, auto 3.73 rear
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-30-2003, 12:24 PM
Steven@nd's Avatar
Steven@nd Steven@nd is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 271
Steven@nd is starting off with a positive reputation.
Why not calculate the actual mileage yourself?

Next time you fill up, reset the trip odometer to zero. When you fill again take the miles and divide them by the gallons of fuel.

MPG = Miles/Gallons

Just an idea...
__________________
96 Thunderbird LX 4.6 v-8 leather, moonroof
51 Ford F-6 flathead v-8 synchro 4-speed
51 IH L-120 silver diamond 220
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-01-2003, 11:52 AM
jwdeats jwdeats is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 248
jwdeats is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
Steven,

I was under the impression everyone was calculating the mileage using your technique. That is how I derive mileage, anyway. On my truck I didn't get that fancy computer thing with the display. I am amazed that some trucks get over 20. I only got about 17 on a highway trip. Maybe the air in Texas is too thick.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-01-2003, 02:39 PM
Colorado-native Colorado-native is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: LaPorte, CO
Posts: 109
Colorado-native is starting off with a positive reputation.
6.0L fuel mileage

shamblin123

Here's the story on your 35 inch tires and fuel mileage.
I just measured the rolling radius on my stock 265s at between 15 1/4 and 15 5/16 inches which translates to 8 feet per revolution or 660 revolutions per mile.

Your 35 inch tires will have a rolling radius of around 17 3/16 inches depending on inflation pressure which translates to 9 feet per revolution or 587 revolutions per mile. For each mile your odometer registers, you have actually traveled 1 1/8 miles - 8 miles on the odometer equals 9 miles traveled. That could account for a 12.5% fuel mileage discrepancy.

However, that is not the whole story. It takes more energy to overcome the rolling resistance of the wide footprint on the road and probably more energy to just turn the increased mass of your tires. Lower inflation pressures will increase the rolling resistance. You have also increased the frontal area for increased wind resistance - larger tires being forced through the air and a raised profile. The air doesn't flow as freely under the vehicle as around and over the body due to turbulence from all those projections underneath.

Wind resistance is no small issue. I had an E350 Van that got in the neighborhood of 16 MPG at 45 MPH and dropped to about 10 MPG at 75 MPH.

Many delivery trucks use skinny high-pressure tires to overcome rolling resistance.

Energy used equals fuel burned!

F250 6.0L 5 speed auto XLT extended cab, Short Box 4X4. 18 - 19 MPG empty mountain highway miles over 10,000 - 12,000 foot passes and 12 - 13 MPG towing a 6000 pound trailer over two 10,000 foot passes.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-01-2003, 03:18 PM
coolbeans's Avatar
coolbeans coolbeans is offline
Wyoming Chapter LDR
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wyoming,USA
Posts: 4,772
coolbeans has much to be proud ofcoolbeans has much to be proud ofcoolbeans has much to be proud ofcoolbeans has much to be proud ofcoolbeans has much to be proud ofcoolbeans has much to be proud ofcoolbeans has much to be proud ofcoolbeans has much to be proud ofcoolbeans has much to be proud of
What has been said so far, is true, also, it may be helpful to change your gears to get you back to 3:73's (if that was your stock ratio).

Mine, on stock 265's gets 20.5 mpg @ 77mph. Towing my 29ft 5'er with my 2 place ATV trailer taggin along,(see my camping gallery), cruise set at 75-77 mph, i get 13 to 14mpg.(there has been times I've got that @ 65mph, oh well) This is a Canadian model & I now have 6300 miles on it since new. Born on 1-24-03.
__________________
Lanny - Wyoming Chapter Leader/Avid Winter Hater
My Counting Cars episode Link http://www.history.com/shows/countin...g-cars-preview *One Love, One Car*
Stop by the Wyoming Chapter and say Howdy sometime!
'53 F-100 50th Anniversary, reborn by Count's Kustoms
'13 Fun Finder 215WSK
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-01-2003, 09:58 PM
Toreador_Diesel's Avatar
Toreador_Diesel Toreador_Diesel is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 8,411
Toreador_Diesel has a superb reputationToreador_Diesel has a superb reputationToreador_Diesel has a superb reputationToreador_Diesel has a superb reputationToreador_Diesel has a superb reputationToreador_Diesel has a superb reputationToreador_Diesel has a superb reputationToreador_Diesel has a superb reputationToreador_Diesel has a superb reputationToreador_Diesel has a superb reputationToreador_Diesel has a superb reputation
Forgive me, but what do you expect? If you put on oversized tires, it is naturally going to make the engine and the transmission work harder. My suggestion, get a chip or a programmer to give yourself a little more muscle to make up for those tires. An exhuast system wouldn't hurt either, every little bit helps. Besides, your truck is nowhere near broken in. That and the overhead console is almost always off by a couple points when it comes to the gas mileage. It shows the average miles per gallon not what you're actually getting. Calculate it yourself, you might a difference and then again you might not. Don't always rely on the console. I hope this helps in one way or another.
__________________
Excursion & 6.7 Forum Mod Death Row Inmate #21
Black Beauty The Mighty 6.0: 2005 Ford Excursion Limited, 4wd "The 6.0" Bulletproofed by Powerstroke Enginuities Straight pipe, Atlas 40, Heavily RiffRaff'd, and Gearheaded
Big Red Beast The Mighty Excursion: 2001 Ford Excursion Limited, 2wd, "The 7.3" Built with blood and sweat by Me and Riffraff Diesel, heavily modded, also Gearheaded
FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2003, 09:58 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Putting a Programmer on the good ol' 6.0 PSD. Jeremy2792 Super Duty & Heavy Duty 18 06-15-2008 03:37 PM
Hey Ford Design Or Qa Department - You Listening ?? skigalini 6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 64 12-27-2003 01:14 PM
SOLUTIONS PLEEZ !! 6.0 Liter WITH POOR FUEL ECONOMY ?? skigalini 6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 30 12-22-2003 09:01 AM
7.3 Liter better fuel economy than the 6.0 Liter ?? skigalini 1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel 26 12-18-2003 02:22 AM
MPG, 35's and 6.0 hired_gun Super Duty & Heavy Duty 0 07-07-2003 07:47 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 6.0L Power Stroke Diesel

Tags
135, 2007, 60, 60l, diesel, economy, f250, ford, fuel, gallon, gas, liter, lose, mileage, miles

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


Participate In The Forums

Create new posts and participate in discussions. It's free!

Sign Up »





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup