Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2003, 09:19 AM
carpe_diem carpe_diem is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,223
carpe_diem is starting off with a positive reputation.
Chevrolet 2500hd, early 90's?

I have a 89 F250hd with 460, 4.10 rear, C6 and factory towing package. I am real pleased with it. However, it gets real poor mileage, of course. About 9 in mixed driving and 11 on highway only, while it is a great towing machine not that practical for daily commute or the grocery store.

I am wondering if in the future I could find another truck. First, keep in mind I don't tow very much and would want something for a daily driver also. But, I don't want to give up big block.

So, I am considering, for example:

1) Early 90's F250hd, with 460 and overdrive tranny. I think they only came with 4.10 rear. (unless 3.55 was special-ordered).

2) Early 90's Chevy 2500hd with 454 engine and 3.73 rear and 4L80 heavy duty tranny.

I tow a trailer which weights about 6500 lbs dry and probably 8500 full. A few thousands miles per year at most and likely much less than that. I know with 4.10 my towing capacity is up, but that, in conjuction with no overdrive, gives abysmal mileage.

I don't have a real brand preference, I had real good luck with this F250 and also real good luck with a chevy sedan with V8.

Question - how much mileage improment can I get with choice (2)? Can I get up to 14 mpg on highway only, turning say only 2200 rpms instead of 3,000 like now?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2003, 02:34 PM
carpe_diem carpe_diem is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,223
carpe_diem is starting off with a positive reputation.
Chevrolet 2500hd, early 90's?

After some thinking, I see it is doubtful I will find a truck as nice as this one. Therefore I decided to install Gear Vendors overdrive, since that's the only problem with the truck.

Nevertheless, would still be interesting to see responses to this thread, from those who have some experience with Chevy 2500HD and 454.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2003, 08:06 PM
Pastmaster Pastmaster is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lee's Summit MO
Posts: 2,719
Pastmaster is starting off with a positive reputation.
Chevrolet 2500hd, early 90's?

I've delt with both of the trucks your looking at.

The Ford is more powerful, but I believe the GM is more comfortable and it is more fuel efficient.

1991 was the first year of a OD Automatic in an HD GM truck, as '89 was the first year for Ford.

From a mileage standpoint, I would believe the Ford would avg. around 13-14 mpg unloaded and the GM would avg. around 14-15mpg unloaded.
__________________
1993 F-150 2wd 302
1996 F-250 2wd 460
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2003, 08:58 PM
carpe_diem carpe_diem is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,223
carpe_diem is starting off with a positive reputation.
Chevrolet 2500hd, early 90's?

The above of course assumes GV overdrive.
I haven't heard of any 460 which got that kind of mileage, unless of course it had an OD. 454 is equally bad, from what I hear (but no personal experience with one)

3 speed is really not good. Reliable, but I don't like it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2003, 05:50 PM
Pastmaster Pastmaster is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lee's Summit MO
Posts: 2,719
Pastmaster is starting off with a positive reputation.
Chevrolet 2500hd, early 90's?

It really depends on your definition of good.

In their times, they were the best transmissions available. Of course then, gas prices weren't 1.65 gallon either.
__________________
1993 F-150 2wd 302
1996 F-250 2wd 460
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2003, 08:02 PM
carpe_diem carpe_diem is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,223
carpe_diem is starting off with a positive reputation.
Chevrolet 2500hd, early 90's?

OD - usually 4th speed in autos was added to reduce RPMs and lower fuel consumption.

Most new trannies with OD are not reliable. It is safe to say that modern trannies are almost as good as old 3-speed trannies. Chrysler 3-speed Torqueflytes (sp), and Ford's C6 and others are very good trannies. I never had problems with them and don't hear others complain either.

Well, I also had good luck with Chevy's 4L60 transmission. 3 speed + 4th OD. Which explains how a 4500lbs station wagon with a V8 can get 22 mpg on highway. I find this very impressive.

C6 and other trannies like it are obsolete, antique design from the 60's and aren't popular in our times. Who would buy a new truck with one.

I cannot wait until I get the funds to install Gear Vendors OD on this truck. It will be the first and last modification I make to the vehicle. I thought about getting a newer F350 (for me, that means 1992-1993 at best) but it is doubtful they are any better than 89 I have and certainly not cost efective.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2003, 10:10 PM
deere81 deere81 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Southern IL
Posts: 465
deere81 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I would recommend a F-250 over the chevy 2500. First reason being past experience with both brands. We have a 1990 F-250 460 and E4OD transmission and 3.55 rearend. This truck does not get the best mileage when driving town 10-12mpg, but it does get around 15 on the highway. We have even got 17 out of it before. Another reason i would choose a F-250hd over a chevy 2500 is because of the different variations of a 2500. Some are on 6 hole wheels and have a semi floating axle. Then there are two different axles that have eight bolt hubs. The only way to be sure if a chevy 2500 is a HD is to pull of the rear hubcap and look for a full floating axle. It is much easier to tell the difference between a F250LD and a F-250HD.
__________________
'05 F-250 XLT, 6.0, ZF6, FX4
'95 F-250 XLT 351 E4OD 4x4
'93 F-350 XL 460 E4OD 4x4
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.