Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1995 F-150 5.0 exhaust question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-06-2017, 01:50 PM
Marko76's Avatar
Marko76
Marko76 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1995 F-150 5.0 exhaust question

Hey guys. I've got a '95 F-150 XLT with a 5.0. I'm about to redo the exhaust and have a question. I've have some people tell me that I have to keep the same size pipe under there or I'll have issues with not enough back pressure on the motor, is this true?
 
  #2  
Old 03-06-2017, 02:03 PM
eenyok's Avatar
eenyok
eenyok is offline
New User
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
It isn't true, but be aware it is likely going to be a pain in the *** getting the old exhaust off.
 
  #3  
Old 03-06-2017, 04:20 PM
Marko76's Avatar
Marko76
Marko76 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure it will be, but I don't have many options. The cats are clogged up so I'm just going to delete them and put straight pipe in their place and replace the muffler. Right now I'm just doing from in front of the first cat to the rear of the muffler and I'm going to replace the rest later once I have more funds to put into it.
 
  #4  
Old 03-06-2017, 04:25 PM
Marko76's Avatar
Marko76
Marko76 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...so to be clear, if I run 3 inch exhaust throughout it won't effect the performance or mpg negatively?
 
  #5  
Old 03-06-2017, 05:02 PM
ChRoNo16's Avatar
ChRoNo16
ChRoNo16 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Shafer, MN
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes it could. this is super common for young people to do.

Measure the exhaust you have, and go just a touch larger if you want persormance.

If you go super huge you can absolutely backpressure the engine. I cannot tell you how many times I see this happen.
 
  #6  
Old 03-06-2017, 05:06 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,911
Likes: 0
Received 956 Likes on 757 Posts
If you install a 3" exhaust on a 5.0 you will lose torque, 2.5" pipe is plenty.
 
  #7  
Old 03-06-2017, 07:41 PM
Marko76's Avatar
Marko76
Marko76 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok thanks guys I wanted to make sure before I got myself into trouble
 
  #8  
Old 03-07-2017, 09:40 AM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Diesel_Brad is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 21,431
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Also, prepare yourself for a CEL with no cat. OBDII vehicles are kinda finicky like that
 
  #9  
Old 03-07-2017, 09:46 AM
351Cleveland C4's Avatar
351Cleveland C4
351Cleveland C4 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the Edge of the Desert
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes on 120 Posts
2.5" is plenty.

We did exactly what you are doing on a 95. You won't have a CEL as long as you keep the O2 sensor installed. You'll need to put a bung in the new pipes.

We used a Ypipe from an early model 302 and put a flowmaster super 44 in it with 2.5" exhaust pipe. It sounds fantastic.
 
  #10  
Old 03-07-2017, 11:19 AM
My4Fordtrucks's Avatar
My4Fordtrucks
My4Fordtrucks is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,844
Received 1,354 Likes on 1,069 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
If you install a 3" exhaust on a 5.0 you will lose torque, 2.5" pipe is plenty.
Many years ago I installed a Gibson 3" cat back system on my '87 Bronco. It killed the low end torque on the 302. I went back to a 2 1/4" system as soon as I could.
 
  #11  
Old 03-07-2017, 12:20 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,911
Likes: 0
Received 956 Likes on 757 Posts
Originally Posted by Diesel_Brad
Also, prepare yourself for a CEL with no cat. OBDII vehicles are kinda finicky like that
This would be an OBD1 truck, obd2 didn't start until '96 in 1/2 tons.
 
  #12  
Old 03-07-2017, 12:40 PM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Diesel_Brad is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 21,431
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
This would be an OBD1 truck, obd2 didn't start until '96 in 1/2 tons.
My bad, i though he said it was a 96
 
  #13  
Old 03-11-2017, 07:39 PM
smegg's Avatar
smegg
smegg is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Coast - Canada
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a 95 F150 and it has OBD 2 .
 
  #14  
Old 03-11-2017, 08:14 PM
Marko76's Avatar
Marko76
Marko76 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mine is OBD 1. Yours was probably made towards the end of 95
 
  #15  
Old 03-11-2017, 08:20 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,581
Received 1,163 Likes on 918 Posts
Originally Posted by smegg
I have a 95 F150 and it has OBD 2 .
Interesting....there are some supposedly OBD-2 1995 model year F150s with California emissions. Perhaps yours is one.

Post a photo of the sticker on the driver side door jamb and the VECI label under the hood.
 


Quick Reply: 1995 F-150 5.0 exhaust question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 AM.