2017+ Super Duty The 2017+ Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab

Dually drag races

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 02-22-2017, 11:00 AM
17450KR's Avatar
17450KR
17450KR is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by troverman
Towing at 1/2 throttle near full towing capacity would not be possible. You'd be crawling in 1st or maybe second gear. It is perfectly possible some HD truck owners might be towing near max capacity and need to tow up this section of Interstate highway. My preference would be to try and maintain the speed limit, which would require full throttle.
Gotcha ya... I understand. My comment was tongue-in-cheek and not meant to be taken literally, aka exactly at half-throttle. I guess I just don't understand the "I have to be the first one to the top of the hill" philosophy. I'll gladly back off the throttle, stay in the right lane, lose some speed and time and save a little abuse on the truck. Then again, I'm never in a hurry...just happy to get there!
 
  #17  
Old 02-22-2017, 11:22 AM
troverman's Avatar
troverman
troverman is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NH
Posts: 10,806
Received 533 Likes on 257 Posts
Originally Posted by 17450KR
Gotcha ya... I understand. My comment was tongue-in-cheek and not meant to be taken literally, aka exactly at half-throttle. I guess I just don't understand the "I have to be the first one to the top of the hill" philosophy. I'll gladly back off the throttle, stay in the right lane, lose some speed and time and save a little abuse on the truck. Then again, I'm never in a hurry...just happy to get there!
No problem, but going over this pass with a heavy trailer will definitely take a heavy foot.

The F-150 EcoBoost towing it's maximum rated towing capacity, has no trouble meeting the speed limit and even needing to back off the gas to not break the speed limit going up this route.

The 2017 F-450 tested by TFL towing right at its maximum of over 30k, could not maintain the speed limit with a foot to the floor. It certainly did better than the RAM, but its interesting how the F-150 seems to have more engine than it needs for it's load rating while the Super Duty could use a little more engine. One is chassis and suspension limited; the other is engine limited.
 
  #18  
Old 02-22-2017, 11:46 AM
17450KR's Avatar
17450KR
17450KR is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by troverman
One is chassis and suspension limited; the other is engine limited.
That is a very interesting observation. Would love to be in the room and hear the discussion when the engineers are determining these things.
 
  #19  
Old 02-22-2017, 01:03 PM
troverman's Avatar
troverman
troverman is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NH
Posts: 10,806
Received 533 Likes on 257 Posts
Originally Posted by 17450KR
That is a very interesting observation. Would love to be in the room and hear the discussion when the engineers are determining these things.
GM recently made the claim (after the launch of the new L5P Duramax) that less than 1% of the HD truck market need to tow over 25,000lbs...hence justification for their 23k rating. So if this is true, most folks will love the performance of a Ford 350 or 450 dually, while still being *able* to tow the max rating if they desire.

I'm a bit surprised that GM did not try to take the cake with a 33k rating, or at least a 30k rating. Knowing most would never attempt it, and especially knowing the Ford 350 DRW is rated for over 30k. Tow ratings are one of the biggest marketing tools and bragging rights among HD truck owners. It lends credence to the theory that something on that GM truck is not up to the task...and almost certainly that component is either the frame or transmission.
 
  #20  
Old 02-22-2017, 01:17 PM
bronc71's Avatar
bronc71
bronc71 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: northern ontario
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by troverman
GM recently made the claim (after the launch of the new L5P Duramax) that less than 1% of the HD truck market need to tow over 25,000lbs...hence justification for their 23k rating. So if this is true, most folks will love the performance of a Ford 350 or 450 dually, while still being *able* to tow the max rating if they desire.

I'm a bit surprised that GM did not try to take the cake with a 33k rating, or at least a 30k rating. Knowing most would never attempt it, and especially knowing the Ford 350 DRW is rated for over 30k. Tow ratings are one of the biggest marketing tools and bragging rights among HD truck owners. It lends credence to the theory that something on that GM truck is not up to the task...and almost certainly that component is either the frame or transmission.
I agree with this as well and i think it's the transmission
 
  #21  
Old 02-22-2017, 01:28 PM
troverman's Avatar
troverman
troverman is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NH
Posts: 10,806
Received 533 Likes on 257 Posts
Originally Posted by bronc71
I agree with this as well and i think it's the transmission
But the more I think about it, GM may not be quite correct in thinking only 1% need to tow more than 25k in the heavy pickup class. If this was true, why does Ford sell so many F-450's?
 
  #22  
Old 02-22-2017, 01:46 PM
senix's Avatar
senix
senix is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 36,554
Received 1,406 Likes on 1,002 Posts
GM is not know for considering there customer base.


Market surveys of what there core customer desires is not considered.


Otherwise they would redesign a lot of the interior and fix the powertrain components to be more competitive.
 
  #23  
Old 02-22-2017, 01:47 PM
oklarado's Avatar
oklarado
oklarado is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by troverman
But the more I think about it, GM may not be quite correct in thinking only 1% need to tow more than 25k in the heavy pickup class. If this was true, why does Ford sell so many F-450's?
I think its the transmission also, but they would never say that because the Allison is such a marketing tool for them. I see a lot of 450's use as grocery getters.
 
  #24  
Old 02-22-2017, 02:06 PM
The Ace of Spades's Avatar
The Ace of Spades
The Ace of Spades is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 551
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by troverman
But the more I think about it, GM may not be quite correct in thinking only 1% need to tow more than 25k in the heavy pickup class. If this was true, why does Ford sell so many F-450's?
because they're awesome. Who doesn't want an F450?
there are several on this board actually, that have admitted that they bought their F450's just because of their looks and stance, they don't actually own a trailer and never will.
but your point is still valid, the F450's are selling for a very good reason and even the most diehard GM guy has to be scratching their heads at what GM is doing (of not doing) right now.
Their HP numbers look good on paper and in one fake youtube video, but this 2017 super duty is going to dominate GM's products in just about every category. I firmly believe the Ford is going to easily win the Ike Gauntlet tow tests too.
 
  #25  
Old 02-22-2017, 02:18 PM
EpicCowlick's Avatar
EpicCowlick
EpicCowlick is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North of Salt Lake City
Posts: 5,159
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
I hope they don't repeat the same thing they did a few years ago. They loaded each trucks to their rated max towing capability and charged them up the mountain. The Ford was pulling the most weight and therefore didn't win and used more fuel. They need to load each truck with the lowest truck's max tow rating and let them pull apples to apples.
 
  #26  
Old 02-22-2017, 02:34 PM
oklarado's Avatar
oklarado
oklarado is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by The Ace of Spades
because they're awesome. Who doesn't want an F450?
there are several on this board actually, that have admitted that they bought their F450's just because of their looks and stance, they don't actually own a trailer and never will.
but your point is still valid, the F450's are selling for a very good reason and even the most diehard GM guy has to be scratching their heads at what GM is doing (of not doing) right now.
Their HP numbers look good on paper and in one fake youtube video, but this 2017 super duty is going to dominate GM's products in just about every category. I firmly believe the Ford is going to easily win the Ike Gauntlet tow tests too.
I thought that GM/International were developing a new 450/550 class truck due out in 2019, it was supposed to be Chevrolet selling the nice pickup versions and international selling the vocational version.
 
  #27  
Old 02-22-2017, 03:11 PM
The Ace of Spades's Avatar
The Ace of Spades
The Ace of Spades is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 551
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by oklarado
I thought that GM/International were developing a new 450/550 class truck due out in 2019, it was supposed to be Chevrolet selling the nice pickup versions and international selling the vocational version.
news to me.
I actually liked the C4500/C5500 trucks that GM came out with 10 years ago. We still have one at work, it was my truck when it was brand new. Crew cab, 10' tool bed, 4x4 with the Allison-Duramax combo. It had some flaws, such as towing capacity, fuel mileage and practicality, but overall I liked it.
we don't use it much anymore, because it's incredibly unreliable, but it's cool to look at back there in the yard.
GM did away with them, but I'm surprised they didn't refine them, or come back with something more F450ish.
They are really missing the boat right now with their towing and hauling numbers.
 
  #28  
Old 02-22-2017, 03:34 PM
bronc71's Avatar
bronc71
bronc71 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: northern ontario
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by oklarado
I think its the transmission also, but they would never say that because the Allison is such a marketing tool for them. I see a lot of 450's use as grocery getters.
Up north here i've only seen 1 450 pickup a 2008 and he hauls HEAVY other then that there was one at my dealer i tried last year (it ended up going on a dealer trade) and mine. every one up here don't even know they exist very rare. As far a 350drw go there's 3 in town (12,000 people) including my old 2011
 
  #29  
Old 02-22-2017, 03:35 PM
oklarado's Avatar
oklarado
oklarado is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by The Ace of Spades
news to me.
I actually liked the C4500/C5500 trucks that GM came out with 10 years ago. We still have one at work, it was my truck when it was brand new. Crew cab, 10' tool bed, 4x4 with the Allison-Duramax combo. It had some flaws, such as towing capacity, fuel mileage and practicality, but overall I liked it.
we don't use it much anymore, because it's incredibly unreliable, but it's cool to look at back there in the yard.
GM did away with them, but I'm surprised they didn't refine them, or come back with something more F450ish.
They are really missing the boat right now with their towing and hauling numbers.



SUBSCRIBE NOW
FOR HOME DELIVERY

Home

News

Sports

Business

Autos

Life + Home

Entertainment

Opinion

Photo + Video


Firefly



Search



139

5

1


Navistar to build medium-duty trucks for GM
Melissa Burden, The Detroit News 9:55 a.m. ET Sept. 30, 2015




(Photo: Navistar)
139
CONNECT

TWEET
5
LINKEDIN
1
COMMENT

EMAIL

MORE
General Motors Co. said Wednesday it has entered into a long-term agreement with Navistar International Corp., an Illinois-based producer of trucks, buses and military vehicles, to co-develop and build medium-duty trucks for the automaker.
The Class 4/5 trucks — which are larger versions of a chassis cab pickup with a hood in front — will be built at Navistar’s plant in Springfield, Ohio, and are expected to go into production in 2018. GM said Navistar will add 300 jobs and invest $12 million to upgrade the plant to build the new vehicles.
“Bringing medium-duty conventional cab trucks back into the portfolio strengthens Chevrolet’s commitment to providing commercial customers with more choices and one-stop shopping for a versatile lineup of trucks, vans and crossovers,” said Ed Peper, U.S. vice president of GM Fleet and Commercial Sales, in a statement.
GM shuttered its medium-duty truck business in mid 2009 after it failed to sell the business; it had sought to sell it to both Isuzu and Navistar. The automaker’s medium-duty trucks had been built on a line inside GM’s Flint Truck Assembly Plant; nearly 400 jobs were cut.
ADVERTISING

inRead invented by Teads
In June, GM announced it had reached a deal with Isuzu Motors to produce low cab forward medium-duty trucks that are slated to go on sale next year in the U.S. Six new Chevrolet models will be available based on the Isuzu N-Series.
GM said the new vehicles would be developed using Navistar’s rolling chassis configurations and would include GM commercial components and engines. Terms of the deal were not disclosed and GM said it would announce product information later.
Navistar, in a statement, said the deal will help it enhance its medium-duty portfolio and use its scale.
Earlier this week, the Ohio Tax Credit Authority approved a 60 percent, six-year jobs creation tax credit for the Springfield work, worth $643,000. Navistar’s 300 new jobs are expected to generate $10.4 million in new payroll a year and retain $38 million in existing payroll.
The plant currently employs about 1,100 workers who build medium-duty trucks such as municipal dump trucks, beverage delivery trucks and moving van trucks.
mburden@detroitnews.com
(313) 222-2319
Twitter.com/MBurden_DN

139
CONNECT

TWEET
5
LINKEDIN
1
COMMENT

EMAIL

MORE

TOP VIDEOS


Joe Nardone, CEO, Wayne County Airport Authority, tours DTW
2:25


Mike Ilitch: 'I fell in love with Midwestern friendliness'
2:40


Microsoft moving to Detroit
3:49


Walking the floor at the NAIAS Charity Preview
1:00


Biden admires Detroit, 'an iconic city'
2:15


Chinese automaker GAC reveals three new vehicles
1:57


Mercedes-Benz introduces new cars
2:48


Infiniti introduces QX50 concept
1:19


2018 Honda Odyssey introduced
0:54


Nissan introduces Vmotion 2.0 concept, Rogue Sport SUV
1:25




by Taboola
AD CONTENT


If Your Grocery Bills Keep Going Up You Should Try This Mea…
Home Chef


How To Fix Your Fatigue (Do This Every Day)
Vital Reds Supplement


My Husband and I Tried Blue Apron, Here's What Happened
Blue Apron


Jo Polniaczek Was Stunning In The Past. What She Looks Lik…
OMG Check It Out


How Much Money Do You Really Get from a Reverse Mortgage?
NewRetirement


Quicken Loans Urges Homeowners To Switch To A 15 Year …
QuickenLoans

MORE STORIES


Craig: Man killed by cop was a carjacker
News | 7 days ago


Hoekstra: Beware of the new ‘resistance’
Opinion | 17 hours ago


MSP traffic stop leads to man with 20 arrest warrants
News | 4 days ago


Black reps dismayed by Trump’s invite to black reporter
News | 5 days ago
 
  #30  
Old 02-22-2017, 03:37 PM
oklarado's Avatar
oklarado
oklarado is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bronc71
Up north here i've only seen 1 450 pickup a 2008 and he hauls HEAVY other then that there was one at my dealer i tried last year (it ended up going on a dealer trade) and mine. every one up here don't even know they exist very rare. As far a 350drw go there's 3 in town (12,000 people) including my old 2011
I live in Oklahoma which is a lot like Texas in the fact that everyone needs a big dually just to get around town.
 


Quick Reply: Dually drag races



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.