What is the actual failure rate of the 4R100 transmission?
#1
What is the actual failure rate of the 4R100 transmission?
I am curious. There are multiple comments regarding transmission problems and clearly some folks are spending major dollars for transmissions assembled by specialty builders.
Clearly all transmissions can't be failing or at least failing prematurely. I wonder if Mark K or perhaps a tech based on experience has a sense of average lifespan. If half the 7.3s last beyond 300,000 miles without a major overhaul, what percentage of transmissions do the same?
Steve
Clearly all transmissions can't be failing or at least failing prematurely. I wonder if Mark K or perhaps a tech based on experience has a sense of average lifespan. If half the 7.3s last beyond 300,000 miles without a major overhaul, what percentage of transmissions do the same?
Steve
#2
#3
One variable we need to clear up is what defines a "failure" are we classifying a failed grand (point of major haul or worse) at a state where it's complete failure or are we looking at tramsmissions that need a major part (think like torque converter) replaced? What is the definition of "failure your wanting as you might consider a failure as something different from me.
#4
#5
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
That information would be difficult to extrapolate even if data could be compiled. The 4R100 gets a bad rap. What people miss most is there were somewhere around 2,000,000 7.3's put into circulation.
1. Let's just surmise about half were Automatics.
2. Consider that the 7.3L DIT has been one of the most longest lasting and mile consuming Engines put into a passenger Truck platform.
3. Realize the availability of Cores of the 4R100 are difficult to come by. And, it was the first of it's predecessors to be totally electronically controlled.
I would say the 4R100 is a workhorse that is still pushing the 7.3L down the road. The 4R100 is perhaps the longest lasting least failure rate of almost any other Transmission for it's application.
But, be that as it is, mechanical parts eventually wear out. Clutch surfaces eventually become bare, and if abused failure is a certainty rather than an exception.
1. Let's just surmise about half were Automatics.
2. Consider that the 7.3L DIT has been one of the most longest lasting and mile consuming Engines put into a passenger Truck platform.
3. Realize the availability of Cores of the 4R100 are difficult to come by. And, it was the first of it's predecessors to be totally electronically controlled.
I would say the 4R100 is a workhorse that is still pushing the 7.3L down the road. The 4R100 is perhaps the longest lasting least failure rate of almost any other Transmission for it's application.
But, be that as it is, mechanical parts eventually wear out. Clutch surfaces eventually become bare, and if abused failure is a certainty rather than an exception.
#11
The reason for my question is simply that it seems the standard manta is "the transmission is the weak sister of the 7.3 drive train". So I have often wondered is that true and if it is how weak is it.
I run stock and intend to continue to run stock. I tow, but not heavy. I tend to baby my equipment, and I change my fluid every two years or about 12,000 to 15,000 miles. I have a 6.0 cooler in place and watch my temps, which are never high.I invest n new parts before old ones break and was simply wondering how to gauge the likely lifespan of my transmission.
I run stock and intend to continue to run stock. I tow, but not heavy. I tend to baby my equipment, and I change my fluid every two years or about 12,000 to 15,000 miles. I have a 6.0 cooler in place and watch my temps, which are never high.I invest n new parts before old ones break and was simply wondering how to gauge the likely lifespan of my transmission.
#12
#13
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Posts: 60,979
Received 3,102 Likes
on
2,164 Posts
at the old job we had over 30 7.3 powered trucks that all had over 600,000 miles on them and only had fluid service at 30,000 miles.
there ts a guy down the street that never does trans service and never got over 90,000 miles out of a trans in his 01 powerstroke. after the third one went he traded the truck for a dodge.
that is now on it's 5th trans in 8 years.
there ts a guy down the street that never does trans service and never got over 90,000 miles out of a trans in his 01 powerstroke. after the third one went he traded the truck for a dodge.
that is now on it's 5th trans in 8 years.
#14
The transmission in my truck was replaced/rebuilt at 120K miles (original owner). I bought the truck with 146K on the odometer and have done nothing but routine flushes to it since I've had it (okay, maybe I added a valve body too). I'm at almost 300K miles and the tranny has been trouble-free (knock on wood).