6.2L V8 Discuss the 6.2L V8

2017 6.2L super duty owners

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #76  
Old 01-17-2017, 05:44 PM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Boise
Posts: 2,824
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
I believe a stock truck identical to mine running 275/70/18 will get better mpg's than mine with the 35's. The size/weight/increased rolling resistance of bigger tires makes a larger impact than a few rpms on the NA V8 for mpg. The 4.30's just aren't as negatively affected by larger tires as the 3.73's are.
This aside, I really feel the 275/65/20 and the 295/70/18 are a great match for the 4.30.
 
  #77  
Old 01-17-2017, 07:09 PM
biz4two's Avatar
biz4two
biz4two is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 5,844
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Arrow

Originally Posted by levimorris85
That's what I'm getting at. With 4.30s and 35" tires isn't your effective gears now 4.07? Which helps contribute to the better MPGs since the truck isn't lugging in low rpm nor is it running higher RPMs with stock size tires. Most of my driving durring the week is local small town driving. Weekends consist of rural driving. I am trying to think outside elements contributing to yours and hopefully my success with 4.30s.
How will your SuperDuty know you have larger tires? Are you going to program the Revolutions per mile into the PCM? If not, then MPG's cannot be accurately calculated, because the PCM is going to think you are still running the smaller OEM tires.

My point to get an accurate measure of MPG's is the PCM must be updated with the NEW tire revolutions per mile the Manufacturer provides.

the dealer NO longer is willing or able to update PCM tire size info.

However, it might be possible to get better MPG with the larger tires...dependent on speed and type of driving.


biz
 
  #78  
Old 01-18-2017, 07:30 PM
johngfla's Avatar
johngfla
johngfla is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a 2017 with a 6.2, 373. I just turned 1200 miles. On its first road trip with high way speed the whole way, i averaged 15.1 mpg. When I got home and was washing the truck, I began to wonder if the rather large air dam under the front bumper was limiting the MPG's. Has anyone experimented by removing the air dam to see if it became a little more aero dynamic and got better mileage without it?
 
  #79  
Old 01-18-2017, 07:33 PM
johngfla's Avatar
johngfla
johngfla is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Here is a picture of my new ride. I traded away a 2013 FX4 F150. Its amazing how much more truck this new 250 is!
 
  #80  
Old 01-18-2017, 07:41 PM
Ron94150's Avatar
Ron94150
Ron94150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 3,146
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
The larger air dam was added to improve fuel mileage. I swapped mine for a shorter 2wd, but I added over sized tires around the same time, so I can't tell you the difference. Air going under the truck hurts fuel mileage. The air dam funnels it around the sides.
 
  #81  
Old 01-18-2017, 07:43 PM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Boise
Posts: 2,824
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
Congratulations and welcome to the club! In all of the mpg/air dam threads and posts I have read over time, the consensus is that they do help for mpg. I took mine off and I'm not really concerned if I lost any mpg's.
 
  #82  
Old 01-19-2017, 04:52 AM
kry226's Avatar
kry226
kry226 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,567
Received 385 Likes on 215 Posts
I would to see some in-cab video of a 2017 6.2 with 4.30s pulling a heavy trailer (10k+) up a decent hill. Don't need to see a mountain pull (I can already surmise that), but just a decent rolling hill, or even a quality overpass. Anyone????

As I'm sure you all have experienced, I continue to struggle with the gas vs. diesel debate for my next truck. Thanks in advance!!
 
  #83  
Old 01-19-2017, 06:31 AM
Strokin-A-2010's Avatar
Strokin-A-2010
Strokin-A-2010 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by kry226
I would to see some in-cab video of a 2017 6.2 with 4.30s pulling a heavy trailer (10k+) up a decent hill. Don't need to see a mountain pull (I can already surmise that), but just a decent rolling hill, or even a quality overpass. Anyone????

As I'm sure you all have experienced, I continue to struggle with the gas vs. diesel debate for my next truck. Thanks in advance!!
If you're not scared to press on the gas pedal and let the 6.2L rev then the 6.2 can do it. The 6.7L will do it easier with less effort.
 
  #84  
Old 01-19-2017, 08:00 AM
Chuck's First Ford's Avatar
Chuck's First Ford
Chuck's First Ford is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: very South Texas
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
I have 1,500 in bed of truck.. and pull a loaded trailer at 9,500 pounds...

for a total rolling weight of 16,880 pounds. and my 6.2L has 150,000 miles...
and had done WV hills at 55 in second gear .. 4,xxx plus... rpms..

the 6.2L loved to spin and will ... but can you live with it doing it.????

I would like to Try a diesel.. but not in the budget.. same with a dually.
 
  #85  
Old 01-19-2017, 01:55 PM
snelldawg's Avatar
snelldawg
snelldawg is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mad River Valley
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by johngfla

Here is a picture of my new ride. I traded away a 2013 FX4 F150. Its amazing how much more truck this new 250 is!
Sweet ride! I have the same truck in black!
 
  #86  
Old 01-19-2017, 11:15 PM
kry226's Avatar
kry226
kry226 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,567
Received 385 Likes on 215 Posts
Originally Posted by Strokin-A-2010
If you're not scared to press on the gas pedal and let the 6.2L rev then the 6.2 can do it. The 6.7L will do it easier with less effort.
Originally Posted by Chuck's First Ford
I have 1,500 in bed of truck.. and pull a loaded trailer at 9,500 pounds...

for a total rolling weight of 16,880 pounds. and my 6.2L has 150,000 miles...
and had done WV hills at 55 in second gear .. 4,xxx plus... rpms..

the 6.2L loved to spin and will ... but can you live with it doing it.????

I would like to Try a diesel.. but not in the budget.. same with a dually.
I have no doubt the 6.2 can do it, and I understand how the gas engine makes it's power. I've towed fairly heavy trailers with gas trucks and after a while the RPMs just simply wear you out. But living with high RPMs in a 10 year old gas truck (or even just a few years old) is not the same as high RPMs in a gas truck built with today's technology. Today's trucks are quieter and the driver seems to be a bit more "isolated" from the engine's noise.

Then you add in the new updates to the 6.2 as found in the 2017 where the torque peaks out a bit lower in the band. Coming from a diesel truck myself, I now have a situation that may make the transition from a diesel truck to a gas truck easier. I just want to somehow get a feel (even if only virtually due to my present location) of how the truck does with the weight I'm likely to tow when I return to the States.
 
  #87  
Old 01-20-2017, 05:33 AM
Bugzilla46310's Avatar
Bugzilla46310
Bugzilla46310 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: DeMotte, IN
Posts: 1,200
Received 280 Likes on 151 Posts
Well this thread was thoroughly hijacked by the 4.3 vs 3.73 arguments. Learned virtually nothing about the new 17's.
 
  #88  
Old 01-20-2017, 06:44 AM
Strokin-A-2010's Avatar
Strokin-A-2010
Strokin-A-2010 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by kry226
I have no doubt the 6.2 can do it, and I understand how the gas engine makes it's power. I've towed fairly heavy trailers with gas trucks and after a while the RPMs just simply wear you out. But living with high RPMs in a 10 year old gas truck (or even just a few years old) is not the same as high RPMs in a gas truck built with today's technology. Today's trucks are quieter and the driver seems to be a bit more "isolated" from the engine's noise.

Then you add in the new updates to the 6.2 as found in the 2017 where the torque peaks out a bit lower in the band. Coming from a diesel truck myself, I now have a situation that may make the transition from a diesel truck to a gas truck easier. I just want to somehow get a feel (even if only virtually due to my present location) of how the truck does with the weight I'm likely to tow when I return to the States.
I don't know what the 6.2 sound or feel like in the 2017 but in my 2015 I had at 4k rpms or higher it was pretty loud in the cab as far as engine noise and exhaust noise. So even with all this technology you can't get rid of the V8 engine sound and noises. lol
 
  #89  
Old 01-20-2017, 07:19 AM
snelldawg's Avatar
snelldawg
snelldawg is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mad River Valley
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
  #90  
Old 01-20-2017, 08:35 AM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Boise
Posts: 2,824
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Bugzilla46310
Well this thread was thoroughly hijacked by the 4.3 vs 3.73 arguments. Learned virtually nothing about the new 17's.
There is a very busy 2017 SD section that is full of info.
 


Quick Reply: 2017 6.2L super duty owners



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.