2017 6.2L super duty owners
#76
I believe a stock truck identical to mine running 275/70/18 will get better mpg's than mine with the 35's. The size/weight/increased rolling resistance of bigger tires makes a larger impact than a few rpms on the NA V8 for mpg. The 4.30's just aren't as negatively affected by larger tires as the 3.73's are.
This aside, I really feel the 275/65/20 and the 295/70/18 are a great match for the 4.30.
This aside, I really feel the 275/65/20 and the 295/70/18 are a great match for the 4.30.
#77
That's what I'm getting at. With 4.30s and 35" tires isn't your effective gears now 4.07? Which helps contribute to the better MPGs since the truck isn't lugging in low rpm nor is it running higher RPMs with stock size tires. Most of my driving durring the week is local small town driving. Weekends consist of rural driving. I am trying to think outside elements contributing to yours and hopefully my success with 4.30s.
My point to get an accurate measure of MPG's is the PCM must be updated with the NEW tire revolutions per mile the Manufacturer provides.
the dealer NO longer is willing or able to update PCM tire size info.
However, it might be possible to get better MPG with the larger tires...dependent on speed and type of driving.
biz
#78
I have a 2017 with a 6.2, 373. I just turned 1200 miles. On its first road trip with high way speed the whole way, i averaged 15.1 mpg. When I got home and was washing the truck, I began to wonder if the rather large air dam under the front bumper was limiting the MPG's. Has anyone experimented by removing the air dam to see if it became a little more aero dynamic and got better mileage without it?
#80
#81
#82
I would to see some in-cab video of a 2017 6.2 with 4.30s pulling a heavy trailer (10k+) up a decent hill. Don't need to see a mountain pull (I can already surmise that), but just a decent rolling hill, or even a quality overpass. Anyone????
As I'm sure you all have experienced, I continue to struggle with the gas vs. diesel debate for my next truck. Thanks in advance!!
As I'm sure you all have experienced, I continue to struggle with the gas vs. diesel debate for my next truck. Thanks in advance!!
#83
I would to see some in-cab video of a 2017 6.2 with 4.30s pulling a heavy trailer (10k+) up a decent hill. Don't need to see a mountain pull (I can already surmise that), but just a decent rolling hill, or even a quality overpass. Anyone????
As I'm sure you all have experienced, I continue to struggle with the gas vs. diesel debate for my next truck. Thanks in advance!!
As I'm sure you all have experienced, I continue to struggle with the gas vs. diesel debate for my next truck. Thanks in advance!!
#84
I have 1,500 in bed of truck.. and pull a loaded trailer at 9,500 pounds...
for a total rolling weight of 16,880 pounds. and my 6.2L has 150,000 miles...
and had done WV hills at 55 in second gear .. 4,xxx plus... rpms..
the 6.2L loved to spin and will ... but can you live with it doing it.????
I would like to Try a diesel.. but not in the budget.. same with a dually.
for a total rolling weight of 16,880 pounds. and my 6.2L has 150,000 miles...
and had done WV hills at 55 in second gear .. 4,xxx plus... rpms..
the 6.2L loved to spin and will ... but can you live with it doing it.????
I would like to Try a diesel.. but not in the budget.. same with a dually.
#85
#86
I have 1,500 in bed of truck.. and pull a loaded trailer at 9,500 pounds...
for a total rolling weight of 16,880 pounds. and my 6.2L has 150,000 miles...
and had done WV hills at 55 in second gear .. 4,xxx plus... rpms..
the 6.2L loved to spin and will ... but can you live with it doing it.????
I would like to Try a diesel.. but not in the budget.. same with a dually.
for a total rolling weight of 16,880 pounds. and my 6.2L has 150,000 miles...
and had done WV hills at 55 in second gear .. 4,xxx plus... rpms..
the 6.2L loved to spin and will ... but can you live with it doing it.????
I would like to Try a diesel.. but not in the budget.. same with a dually.
Then you add in the new updates to the 6.2 as found in the 2017 where the torque peaks out a bit lower in the band. Coming from a diesel truck myself, I now have a situation that may make the transition from a diesel truck to a gas truck easier. I just want to somehow get a feel (even if only virtually due to my present location) of how the truck does with the weight I'm likely to tow when I return to the States.
#88
I have no doubt the 6.2 can do it, and I understand how the gas engine makes it's power. I've towed fairly heavy trailers with gas trucks and after a while the RPMs just simply wear you out. But living with high RPMs in a 10 year old gas truck (or even just a few years old) is not the same as high RPMs in a gas truck built with today's technology. Today's trucks are quieter and the driver seems to be a bit more "isolated" from the engine's noise.
Then you add in the new updates to the 6.2 as found in the 2017 where the torque peaks out a bit lower in the band. Coming from a diesel truck myself, I now have a situation that may make the transition from a diesel truck to a gas truck easier. I just want to somehow get a feel (even if only virtually due to my present location) of how the truck does with the weight I'm likely to tow when I return to the States.
Then you add in the new updates to the 6.2 as found in the 2017 where the torque peaks out a bit lower in the band. Coming from a diesel truck myself, I now have a situation that may make the transition from a diesel truck to a gas truck easier. I just want to somehow get a feel (even if only virtually due to my present location) of how the truck does with the weight I'm likely to tow when I return to the States.
#90