1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

6.5L Diesel conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-04-2016, 10:39 AM
Tbanks1382's Avatar
Tbanks1382
Tbanks1382 is offline
Trailering
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.5L Diesel conversion

So I have an 01 super duty with a 6.8L V10. She's running strong at 250k but I'm starting to think she's gonna go soon. I love that truck and have been milling around the idea of converting it over to a diesel. Through my research I have found numerous people doing a cummins swap. However if I'm going to drop a late 90's motor in her why not a 6.5L? Has anyone ever heard of this or seen it done?
 
  #2  
Old 10-04-2016, 01:58 PM
Deuce40s's Avatar
Deuce40s
Deuce40s is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: NC
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Tbanks1382
Through my research I have found numerous people doing a cummins swap. However if I'm going to drop a late 90's motor in her why not a 6.5L? Has anyone ever heard of this or seen it done?
There's a reason for that. The GM 6.5L is a turd. They have fairly significant design flaws and people rarely get more than 300k miles before they have to be torn down. In that 300k miles they have sunk a ton of money in it keeping it on the road. In my opinion it's because you have to wind them up so high to get any power. The 5.9L makes the same power as the 6.5L, but at half the RPMs.
 
  #3  
Old 10-04-2016, 03:27 PM
cyncwby's Avatar
cyncwby
cyncwby is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: So. Utah
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sorry but have to ask....did you meen a 6.7 Powerstroke? And yes the 6.5 GM was a turd.
 
  #4  
Old 10-04-2016, 04:44 PM
Norma stitz's Avatar
Norma stitz
Norma stitz is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 6.5 was a fantastic engine, compared to the 6.2!
 
  #5  
Old 10-04-2016, 06:05 PM
1979 Ford's Avatar
1979 Ford
1979 Ford is offline
FTE Chapter Leader
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Not as far west as I want
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
The 6.5 GM? Bahahahahahhahahahah.


Lol. That is funny


No.
 
  #6  
Old 10-04-2016, 08:59 PM
texastech_diesel's Avatar
texastech_diesel
texastech_diesel is offline
Token Redneck

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Breckenridge, TX
Posts: 9,089
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
Norma means the 6.2 Chevy diesel (fingers crossed)

I'd take either gas Ford or Chevy 6.2 over either of those diesels.
 
  #7  
Old 10-04-2016, 09:09 PM
Norma stitz's Avatar
Norma stitz
Norma stitz is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lol. Yes the old 6.2 was a real pos. I owned one for about a year which was long enough to have several major mechanicals. But back then people really did admire the 6.5
 
  #8  
Old 10-04-2016, 11:06 PM
Lubbockguy1979's Avatar
Lubbockguy1979
Lubbockguy1979 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lubbock
Posts: 2,757
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Probably be better off trying to make the v10 into a diesel. The 6.5 was to high of compression had all sorts of design issues. Ive seen some diehards that have built them to be comparable to a stock 7.3.. power wise but a stock 6.2 ford truck could probably be very competitve and cheaper than the swap.
 
  #9  
Old 10-05-2016, 12:05 AM
Yahiko's Avatar
Yahiko
Yahiko is offline
FTE Chapter Leader
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Spanaway
Posts: 27,307
Received 542 Likes on 396 Posts
It seems that everyone forgets that a frankntruck are hard to get rid of
and you never get your money out of then when you do.



Sean <BR>

6.0L Tech Folder
 
  #10  
Old 10-05-2016, 12:07 AM
Lubbockguy1979's Avatar
Lubbockguy1979
Lubbockguy1979 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lubbock
Posts: 2,757
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Look at the jeep community lol
 
  #11  
Old 10-05-2016, 05:57 PM
1979 Ford's Avatar
1979 Ford
1979 Ford is offline
FTE Chapter Leader
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Not as far west as I want
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Jeep... just empty every pocket.

I'm looking for an unmolested wrangler.
 
  #12  
Old 10-05-2016, 06:54 PM
Yahiko's Avatar
Yahiko
Yahiko is offline
FTE Chapter Leader
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Spanaway
Posts: 27,307
Received 542 Likes on 396 Posts
Originally Posted by 1979 Ford
Jeep... just empty every pocket.

I'm looking for an unmolested wrangler.
You may just need a time machine to do that.



Sean <BR>

6.0L Tech Folder
 
  #13  
Old 10-05-2016, 10:24 PM
Lubbockguy1979's Avatar
Lubbockguy1979
Lubbockguy1979 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lubbock
Posts: 2,757
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Finding a wrangler that is stock is easy. Finding one at a decent price though is a challenge most of the stock ones need alot of stuff to make them right even for stock. People that dont modify jeeps dont maintain them.
 
  #14  
Old 10-06-2016, 05:55 AM
Slowpoke Slim's Avatar
Slowpoke Slim
Slowpoke Slim is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 1,167
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
They are pronounced "Heaps" for a reason.

And I've owned 5 of them, from a '64 to a '00. They seemed to get steadily crappier with each new model year. Wouldn't touch one newer than mid 70's now, and would also want to find one unmolested. Yeah, right. Ain't going to pay those prices for one.
 
  #15  
Old 10-06-2016, 08:41 AM
Lubbockguy1979's Avatar
Lubbockguy1979
Lubbockguy1979 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lubbock
Posts: 2,757
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
My problem is a jeep would end up with nearly a superduty drive train so i just want a dead one. Ill keep the hood and doors pretty much everything else would be Just. Everyone. Elses. Parts
 


Quick Reply: 6.5L Diesel conversion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 PM.