2017+ Super Duty The 2017+ Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab

The new capacities are probably correct

  #1  
Old 09-26-2016, 07:03 AM
T diesel's Avatar
T diesel
T diesel is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
The new capacities are probably correct

I'm starting to get the feeling that previous to 2017, Ford's
towing numbers were inflated.
What Is SAE J2807? What Does It Really Mean For Your Pickup Truck?
Standardized Tow Rating Procedure Finally Gaining Traction | Edmunds.com
Now it seems the playing field is level.
 
  #2  
Old 09-26-2016, 07:14 AM
Force74's Avatar
Force74
Force74 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have one of the first suspected mis-tagged trucks. With it now being well over 6 weeks since the issue has been found, I think its suspicious that Fords not said anything. Of course Ford pulling down the F350 SRW rating off their website, then putting it back up with an updated number doesn't make any sense either. In short, I have no idea what is going on-lol, but this is great info. Thank You.
 
  #3  
Old 09-26-2016, 07:15 AM
bowler304's Avatar
bowler304
bowler304 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I had this same theory a while back, guess it is time the big 3 all played by the same rules. Also saw an article that said Ford and Dodge would remove parts of the vehicle to bump up weight being towed.
 
  #4  
Old 09-26-2016, 07:20 AM
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
johndeerefarmer
johndeerefarmer is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,656
Received 73 Likes on 55 Posts
I am not worried about tow ratings but want to know about axle and payload
 
  #5  
Old 09-26-2016, 07:48 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,058
Received 434 Likes on 319 Posts
When the F150 changed over to the new SAE J-whatever standard for tow ratings, the numbers didn't change a whole lot. And from what I recall, that standard has nothing to do with payload when not towing.
 
  #6  
Old 09-26-2016, 07:26 PM
gbkeith's Avatar
gbkeith
gbkeith is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe, but there are still a lot of inconsistencies with the tow capacity chart. A SRW 6.2 truck has a higher gcwr than a DRW, some trucks have a higher listed conventional tow rating than they do gooseneck. 250 and 350 diesels are shown to have the same gcwr even though they have different tow capacities.
 
  #7  
Old 09-27-2016, 01:52 PM
RubyRed350Platinum's Avatar
RubyRed350Platinum
RubyRed350Platinum is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gbkeith
Maybe, but there are still a lot of inconsistencies with the tow capacity chart. A SRW 6.2 truck has a higher gcwr than a DRW, some trucks have a higher listed conventional tow rating than they do gooseneck. 250 and 350 diesels are shown to have the same gcwr even though they have different tow capacities.
Add to that that a F-350 SRW 4X4 at the 11,500 GVWR in a long bed has a higher payload than the short bed. The short beds should always carry more payload as they are lighter.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JD'sBigredv10
2017+ Super Duty
71
08-02-2019 04:52 PM
tegnamo
Flatbed, Car, Boat, Utility, Horse & Misc. Trailer Towing
9
06-18-2018 10:42 PM
rgwilliams69
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel
7
01-12-2013 07:40 AM
tstpnb
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
4
09-25-2004 09:30 AM
eastburn
Other; Brakes, Electrical, Hitches, Weight Distribution & CDL Discussion
9
12-07-2003 11:57 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: The new capacities are probably correct



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 AM.