1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

Accelerator cable problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 09-19-2016, 08:28 PM
James_Western_Canada's Avatar
James_Western_Canada
James_Western_Canada is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,034
Received 56 Likes on 46 Posts
Pruitt66: Cab mounts may contribute to this to some degree, but typically, as the cab sags, the fender to door gap opens up at the bottom. In the pic you posted, you can see that your fender to door gap is getting wider at the bottom, but just barely, I have seen trucks with a three finger gap at the bottom

James
 
  #17  
Old 09-19-2016, 09:27 PM
Pruitt66's Avatar
Pruitt66
Pruitt66 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't really think cab mounts would be enough to cause it guess I was just hoping that it would be that simple. I have been trying to figure this out for a few weeks now.
 
  #18  
Old 09-19-2016, 10:33 PM
James_Western_Canada's Avatar
James_Western_Canada
James_Western_Canada is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,034
Received 56 Likes on 46 Posts
Pruitt66: What I said was, It may contribute to some degree, not that it was the sole cause........

James

Originally Posted by James_Western_Canada
Pruitt66: Cab mounts may contribute to this to some degree, but typically, as the cab sags, the fender to door gap opens up at the bottom. In the pic you posted, you can see that your fender to door gap is getting wider at the bottom, but just barely, I have seen trucks with a three finger gap at the bottom

James

Originally Posted by Pruitt66
Didn't really think cab mounts would be enough to cause it guess I was just hoping that it would be that simple. I have been trying to figure this out for a few weeks now.
 
  #19  
Old 09-19-2016, 11:36 PM
Pruitt66's Avatar
Pruitt66
Pruitt66 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was agreeing with you that it wouldn't be the sole cause. I was just hoping that it might had been. So now I guess I'll just keep trying to figure it out.
 
  #20  
Old 09-19-2016, 11:44 PM
SuperSabre's Avatar
SuperSabre
SuperSabre is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
My truck throttle cable looks the same as the picture provided by '66 with a 352. Your engine is sitting too high.
 
  #21  
Old 09-20-2016, 12:01 AM
Pruitt66's Avatar
Pruitt66
Pruitt66 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If that's true then I need to find out was originally in the truck and go from there. But if it was factory with the FE what would cause this? Wouldn't all FE motors use the same stools?
 
  #22  
Old 09-20-2016, 07:18 AM
Pruitt66's Avatar
Pruitt66
Pruitt66 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


So here is a picture of the vin F10YK844235. So as stated above it came factory with a 352. Any ideas what would cause a truck that came with a FE and currently has a FE in it to have the motor sit up to high?
 
  #23  
Old 09-20-2016, 09:08 AM
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
TA455HO is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,662
Received 522 Likes on 415 Posts
Are the valve covers the stock pent roof type? If not they might stick up a bit higher in the back end. Compare 66with352's picture to what you have and see if they are shaped the same. May be another factor.

.
 
  #24  
Old 09-20-2016, 11:55 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
1965/66 FE engines have pent roofed shaped valve covers.

1967/76 FE engines have similar pent roofed shaped valve covers, but are embossed Powered by Ford.
 
  #25  
Old 09-20-2016, 01:14 PM
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
TA455HO is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,662
Received 522 Likes on 415 Posts
Yes, that might be part of it then. Here's a close up of my drivers side 1966 pent roof on that back edge. Looks like it leans forward much more quickly than the picture in post #8. I don't have a later valve cover here to compare to - only an earlier Thunderbird embossed cover(s) from about a 1963 FE.

Name:  1C990B32-F513-4C57-AC03-7455FADDE16B_zpselenbap4.jpg
Views: 896
Size:  2.33 MB

Here's a link to the other picture. Judge for yourself.

http://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.ford...4ca66c3b9e.jpg

.
 
  #26  
Old 09-20-2016, 01:53 PM
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
TA455HO is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,662
Received 522 Likes on 415 Posts
Here they are side by side in pictures. Might be skewed so not sure that is part of the issue, but it seems like a possibility to me.


Name:  Comparison_zpsk8fcwwoq.jpg
Views: 831
Size:  215.1 KB

.
 
  #27  
Old 09-20-2016, 05:22 PM
hiball3985's Avatar
hiball3985
hiball3985 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: tujunga, calif
Posts: 3,758
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
Something isn't right, cab has dropped or the engine mounts or something has raised the engine. I have taller then stock covers because I use solid lifters and adjustable rockers on mine and the cable still clears..
 
  #28  
Old 09-20-2016, 09:30 PM
Pruitt66's Avatar
Pruitt66
Pruitt66 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So from what I can tell the cab hasn't dropped enough to cause this because the body line still lines up pretty close with the bed. So that leaves that I have a truck that came factory with a FE and currently has a FE but has the wrong stools somehow. Makes sense I guess considering that hack job thats been done on everything else by the PO lol.
 
  #29  
Old 09-21-2016, 06:11 AM
66with352's Avatar
66with352
66with352 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Here is a pic of what the motor mount should look like for reference. Keep in mind, my 66 F100 is 4wd. Not sure if 2wd is the same. I'm sure someone out there can tell us if they are the same. Hope this helps


 
  #30  
Old 09-22-2016, 02:07 AM
Pruitt66's Avatar
Pruitt66
Pruitt66 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Checked my motor mount today looks just like this one. Guess the only thing that it can be now is the stools are wrong.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Honeybadger
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
01-05-2015 03:13 PM
65_GarageArt
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
02-05-2013 04:55 PM
peganit2
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
11-24-2009 04:15 PM
72bronc
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
01-14-2009 11:56 AM
jcs1966
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
12-01-2003 10:53 AM



Quick Reply: Accelerator cable problems



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 AM.