1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

1948 f5 looking for opinions!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-09-2016, 05:13 PM
c249a's Avatar
c249a
c249a is offline
Cross-Country
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 3 Posts
1948 f5 looking for opinions!

Hi,
I’m facing a problem with the build of my truck.
I would need your opinions!
It’s making 4-6 months that my build is stalled because I can’t decide which way to go.

Here is what I’m facing:
1948 F-5
Frame: Done
Engine: Done (What a nice sound)
Transmission: Done (4 speed non syncro)

Here is what I want:
A nice truck that can do 60 mph, I will never be pulling any trailer or load the bed…

My problem:
Engine: 2000 rpm
Tire size: 35’’ (total)
Transmission: 1-1
Differential: 6.66!!!!!
Speed: 31 mph far from 60mph

Need to do:
Differential ratio would need to be 3.4…
Or
Transmission overdrive 0.52-1

Here is my question…
How can I convert my truck to go faster? What would you do? What have you done?

1- Use a ranger overdrive… Would bring me to a 40 mph?
2- Change the entire rear end for another drum dually unit?
3- Any other solution?

I’ve tried to locate a differential from a dodge motor home with no success here in Canada.
At the same time I was looking for widow maker replacement wheel but no luck.
I’m not sure wheel adapters will pass the inspection so I won’t have the choice to go with custom wheels anyway!

I have a 2004 differential with 3.5 ratios but with disc… And after reading much stuff I understand to never do this! Really dangerous!

Thanks for all your helps! Has usual!
 
  #2  
Old 09-09-2016, 06:37 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,799
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
You're limiting yourself unnecessarily to 2000 RPM. You really need to be up around 2500 (maybe more) to make enough HP for wind resistance at 60 mph (pushing a barn door thru the air) and moving that much weight. It won't hurt the engine, even for long periods.

But you need to address the widowmakers issue first, because that will determine tire size and potentially axle ratio.
 
  #3  
Old 09-09-2016, 07:12 PM
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
truckdog62563 is online now
Marmon-Herrington Man
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 11,698
Received 260 Likes on 214 Posts
Building on Ross' comment, moving to a set of 22.5" tubeless wheels with 9R22.5" tires yield a 38" + tire diameter. Below is a pair now on eBay in NH if you can travel south to pick them up. For the other four you might check with Chuck Mantiglia of Chuck's Trucks in CT for a set of the new reproduction 22.5s.

Then if you can get creative on shipping, perhaps shipping it to Chuck for you to pick up there, below is a Dana 70HD now on eBay. It yields a 4.56/1 ratio which will give all the road speed you'll want with the taller tires. Stu

Chucks Trucks LLC., Chuck's Trucks, Chucks Trucks

http://www.ebay.com/itm/252528460640?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIThttp://www.ebay.com/itm/172288382330?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
 
  #4  
Old 09-09-2016, 07:42 PM
raytasch's Avatar
raytasch
raytasch is offline
Believe Nothing

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: W. Central FL.
Posts: 7,327
Received 244 Likes on 153 Posts
Has anyone tried to run a truck of F5 size and weight with that type final gearing we're discussing here? Looking at c249a's signature line, I see he lists a 1946 engine which would be a 59A block and rated at 85 HP, would it not?
I would think the type of terrain driven would be a big factor in success or failure of such gearing to HP. The crash box would make it interesting if many mountains were transversed.
I would think that Dana 70 as shown would need a rebuild from what I see on the ring gear faces.
To the OP, I wanted an F4 that I could run at highway speed and did not think it was practical to do this with a stock Ford engine of somewhere around 100 HP. I installed a later V8 with an automatic OD transmission pulling 4:10 gears in a Dana 70. I do run a mismatch front to rear wheels. I have five lug 19.5" with 225s on the front and 285/16s on the rear. Front and rears are the same OD.
 
  #5  
Old 09-09-2016, 07:53 PM
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
truckdog62563 is online now
Marmon-Herrington Man
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 11,698
Received 260 Likes on 214 Posts
Valid points, Ray. I know of two trucks with the D70HD. The guy I sold mine to and a Studebaker guy I met. But both of them run 19.5s at 34" diameter, same as the motor home. That early flatty would be short on torque to make the wheels and axle be roadable, I agree. Stu
 
  #6  
Old 09-09-2016, 07:57 PM
CHUCK48-50's Avatar
CHUCK48-50
CHUCK48-50 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: HAMDEN, CT
Posts: 470
Received 74 Likes on 27 Posts
For a truck that will be light all the time, 5.14 is the ideal ratio, with either 8.25-20's or 9R-22.5's. The truck will be happy at 65 MPH. If you were going to carry a load, 5.83 is the desired ratio. The truck will be happier at 60 MPH, but will do 65 for short periods. You need a modern engine, with big HP to pull gear ratios in the 4's.
I have NOS 5.14 ring & pinions, as well as a bunch of 5.57's that are in Nash boxes. I haven't tried the 5.57's yet, but I think I will in my 4 x 4 F-5 school bus. That way it will have enough power if it has a bunch of people in it, but should still be comfortable on the highway.
Chuck
 
  #7  
Old 09-09-2016, 08:58 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,799
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
Originally Posted by raytasch
Has anyone tried to run a truck of F5 size and weight with that type final gearing we're discussing here? Looking at c249a's signature line, I see he lists a 1946 engine which would be a 59A block and rated at 85 HP, would it not?
Correct. Even the mighty 8BA with 100 HP (gross) needs to be spinning in the high 2000's to keep a rig this size moving at 60 mph. 2000 RPM would be appropriate for a lightweight roadster or maybe a streamlined car, not an F-5.

I would think the type of terrain driven would be a big factor in success or failure of such gearing to HP. The crash box would make it interesting if many mountains were transversed.
Yes, and not like a crashbox is fun on ANY road!
 
  #8  
Old 09-09-2016, 09:04 PM
c249a's Avatar
c249a
c249a is offline
Cross-Country
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 3 Posts
Wow thanks for all this info!
Ross: I'm happy to know about 2500rpm
Ray: Pretty flat terrain... I don't plan to use this truck far away from home!
Chuck: I will contact you.
Others: thanks for the info
 
  #9  
Old 09-09-2016, 09:18 PM
49f3dls's Avatar
49f3dls
49f3dls is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Southern SC.
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Well it looks like the good knowledgeable folks at FTE 48-56 solved another problem to get an old rig back on the road. Don't you just love this site and the good guys/gals on it.
Now you mission Benj should you choose to accept it is just implement it!
Have fun and keep us in the loop.
 
  #10  
Old 09-09-2016, 10:57 PM
49fordv8f4's Avatar
49fordv8f4
49fordv8f4 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: North Central Arkansas
Posts: 2,594
Received 69 Likes on 40 Posts
The 59A engine has the same HP and torque as the early 8BA. An empty F5 with 5.83 gears and a flathead V8 will run 60 mph all day long without hurting the engine. Fuel mileage won't be great. I had no trouble running my '47 COE with an 8BA, T9 4 speed and a two speed axle with 5.83 in high, 60 mph. It would run 65. It was a 158" w.b. with an 1800lb 16' flatbed.
Mark
 
  #11  
Old 09-10-2016, 12:22 PM
c249a's Avatar
c249a
c249a is offline
Cross-Country
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks Mark
It's really good info!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
youngfordkid
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
07-27-2011 03:44 PM
cbass139
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
25
08-21-2009 01:51 PM
jmadsen
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
20
06-06-2009 09:45 PM
I_Thnk_Ford
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
19
04-02-2006 02:02 PM
AmeriKen
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
01-18-2003 11:19 PM



Quick Reply: 1948 f5 looking for opinions!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.