My phone has a virus?
#106
03-21-2017, 07:35 AM
Cargo Master
And he's also been telling you it isn't something wrong with FTE's forum software too, but some of you guys keep insisting it is.
Give it a rest man. He's trying to help but some of you guys won't accept the info he's posted regarding it not being a problem with the software. Sure, it turns out he was half correct, and half wrong, but some have been all wrong in continuing to blame FTE.
Like has been said MANY times, if this was something infecting the forum software, it would be global and everyone would be affected, not a select few, and from those few, even less who want to blame FTE.
Stewart
Give it a rest man. He's trying to help but some of you guys won't accept the info he's posted regarding it not being a problem with the software. Sure, it turns out he was half correct, and half wrong, but some have been all wrong in continuing to blame FTE.
Like has been said MANY times, if this was something infecting the forum software, it would be global and everyone would be affected, not a select few, and from those few, even less who want to blame FTE.
Stewart
It doesn't matter to me if it's FTE or advertisers. The fact is it never happens on any sites that aren't run by IB. We have been posting screen shots since last July, then to say the screen shots are too old to use is ridiculous. If the issue had of been looked at months ago we wouldn't be here today still talking about it
#107
03-21-2017, 12:53 PM
Regarding ctubutis , I've only experienced one example of his disrespect, but that's more than enough, especially coming from a moderator. I don't know of any other examples referred to.
Poor behavior discredits his points. And makes me mad. I pay for a membership to this site; only to be disrespected by one of the leaders. Unacceptable.
Poor behavior discredits his points. And makes me mad. I pay for a membership to this site; only to be disrespected by one of the leaders. Unacceptable.
No excuses, but we are human too, and try as we might, frustrations can show in the way we post. I know Steve (RIP my friend) had previously "clued me in" when I was being a bit too blunt (and maybe too harsh, seeing as how my name is in red font) in a post, in the past, but that's just proof we make mistakes. I'm sure that's not a shock to anyone.
The facts are that since last July we have been reporting this problem and have stated that it wasn't our phones.
It doesn't matter to me if it's FTE or advertisers. The fact is it never happens on any sites that aren't run by IB. We have been posting screen shots since last July, then to say the screen shots are too old to use is ridiculous. If the issue had of been looked at months ago we wouldn't be here today still talking about it
It doesn't matter to me if it's FTE or advertisers. The fact is it never happens on any sites that aren't run by IB. We have been posting screen shots since last July, then to say the screen shots are too old to use is ridiculous. If the issue had of been looked at months ago we wouldn't be here today still talking about it
Stewart
#108
03-21-2017, 01:33 PM
This is an ongoing issue that affects ALL publishers across the entirety of the internet, not just Internet Brands. The problem is so severe that advertising publishers and partners now are discussing strategies on how to stop "rogue" bidders from taking over phone screens as it's seriously affecting all parties involved. This isn't something we can address and fix unless we forego 100% of the ads altogether.
Obviously this is an answer nobody likes (including us), but it is the unfortunate reality for the moment.
Old screenshots from the summer are pointless, because they are no longer the ads being served. Advertising space is usually sold in month-long intervals, so even screenshots from February would not be helpful for us in getting them blocked.
Obviously this is an answer nobody likes (including us), but it is the unfortunate reality for the moment.
Old screenshots from the summer are pointless, because they are no longer the ads being served. Advertising space is usually sold in month-long intervals, so even screenshots from February would not be helpful for us in getting them blocked.
#109
03-22-2017, 12:10 PM
Fleet Mechanic
Just got one, and managed to ping the server (granted it had 100% loss). IP came back as 54.227.226.107 with the URL being lottosz.com/Ip/#Congrats
May not amount to much, but it is more information than I have gotten on the last couple of tries.
I want to say it is an older server though, as it still has an IPv4 address instead of an IPv6.
May not amount to much, but it is more information than I have gotten on the last couple of tries.
I want to say it is an older server though, as it still has an IPv4 address instead of an IPv6.
#111
03-22-2017, 06:36 PM
#119
11-03-2017, 09:17 PM
