Difference in IPs from R&D
#1
Difference in IPs from R&D
Hey all,
I finished up my injectors from R&D a few weeks ago and my plan is to have a new IP in by 4th of July.
My goal is to have a reliable & strong truck that doesn't guzzle fuel. I want to buy quality parts, that's why I am going through Justin. I picked up a JY turbo off a 94 idi that still needs to go in this summer. I will probably do head studs when I finally pull the engine, but that's not clear when. I will probably run and intercooler, and upgrade the turbo with a new wheel or whatever else I can do.
But most importantly I don't want to spend a ton of cash on something that will make my blow through fuel. Can someone explain if I buy rd4-150 or a rd2-80 or anywhere in between does that mean I am going to be killing my mileage? I understand it is all in the pedal, but if I am putting more fuel in at 2800 rpm then I am burning more fuel, also how is the curving different?
Devin
I finished up my injectors from R&D a few weeks ago and my plan is to have a new IP in by 4th of July.
My goal is to have a reliable & strong truck that doesn't guzzle fuel. I want to buy quality parts, that's why I am going through Justin. I picked up a JY turbo off a 94 idi that still needs to go in this summer. I will probably do head studs when I finally pull the engine, but that's not clear when. I will probably run and intercooler, and upgrade the turbo with a new wheel or whatever else I can do.
But most importantly I don't want to spend a ton of cash on something that will make my blow through fuel. Can someone explain if I buy rd4-150 or a rd2-80 or anywhere in between does that mean I am going to be killing my mileage? I understand it is all in the pedal, but if I am putting more fuel in at 2800 rpm then I am burning more fuel, also how is the curving different?
Devin
#2
#3
I got n/a .. so someone with a before after turbo would know better ..
But i get my best fuel economy 1,300 to 2,100 rpm .. and i understand most turbo's aren't really spooling alot on the bottom end .. so i would think they would want to kinda stomp it to build pressure and get it into the powerband .. totally a guess as i never driven a turbo idi ..
As a matter of preference i like down low power and torque .. and good fuel economy .. so if i ever did do a turbo on a dd it would be a smaller quickly spooling one .. at the expense of some top end hp .. i think justin did a writup of the turbos an d if memory serves a little one number 256 i think looked pretty cool .. but i admittedly have strange taste ..
My reasoning would be likely flatter fuel curve .. off line grunt .. decent milage .. but probably won't build more then 10 -15 psi but would do it quickly .. that said .. i was just musing and overall i like my engine power .. sound and economy .. so not gonna turbo it .. i think a n/a would get better milage ..
In theory a turbo could get hypothetically better milage but i don't see it in what mpg numbers people post .. but you can drive fast so i do see the appeal ..
But i get my best fuel economy 1,300 to 2,100 rpm .. and i understand most turbo's aren't really spooling alot on the bottom end .. so i would think they would want to kinda stomp it to build pressure and get it into the powerband .. totally a guess as i never driven a turbo idi ..
As a matter of preference i like down low power and torque .. and good fuel economy .. so if i ever did do a turbo on a dd it would be a smaller quickly spooling one .. at the expense of some top end hp .. i think justin did a writup of the turbos an d if memory serves a little one number 256 i think looked pretty cool .. but i admittedly have strange taste ..
My reasoning would be likely flatter fuel curve .. off line grunt .. decent milage .. but probably won't build more then 10 -15 psi but would do it quickly .. that said .. i was just musing and overall i like my engine power .. sound and economy .. so not gonna turbo it .. i think a n/a would get better milage ..
In theory a turbo could get hypothetically better milage but i don't see it in what mpg numbers people post .. but you can drive fast so i do see the appeal ..
#4
Without a turbo(or enough of one), you will just get black smoke instead of high enough pressures to blow a head gasket; you need the extra air in there to get enough pressures to need them. And you can even run a mild turbo(10 psi or so) before needing the studs.
#5
#6
I would not go over a 90cc on a 6.9 unless you decompressed it with piston shaving. There have already been examples of 6.9's WITH head studs blowing head gaskets on 90cc's of fuel and BW 256 turbos. RD2-90 is a good companion for the factory turbo kit. Get that and really consider ARP head studs for peace of mind and the ability to get the most out of that 90cc safely.
#7
Is it safe to say I am never gonna get enough combustible fuel into the cylinder to push my EGTs out of a safe range with out a turbo?
Does extra cc's of fuel just represent more unburned fuel (IE no additional heat production). ?
Is the fuel curve the same? Can I just turn the 110 down to mimic the 90?
Devin
Does extra cc's of fuel just represent more unburned fuel (IE no additional heat production). ?
Is the fuel curve the same? Can I just turn the 110 down to mimic the 90?
Devin
Trending Topics
#8
#9
You will get your EGTS over 1,000 just lightly accelerating without a turbo. Turbos help by "diluting" the exhaust gases with cooler air and by adding additional oxygen so the combustion takes place in the chamber. I would say you can't run those pumps (110cc) without a turbo, and you shouldn't ideally without an intercooler. I wouldnt adjust anything, just wait and get the right pump at the right time.
#10
#11
Justin just yesterday put one of his stage 1 turbos on a 093 exhaust housing. It will be a direct drop in to replace the Garrett, it even works with the factory hat. As soon as he gets the wastegate linkage figured out the option will be available for sale. This will replace his rebuilds and Garrett upgrades. The stage 1 turbo flows 65 lbs/min. and is enough air for a 110cc pump. It should be good to about 350 horsepower. It is a great turbo, and anything you fabricate as far as an Intercooler on the 093 Garrett will work exactly the same way with the stage 1 drop in if you upgrade later.
#12
Is it safe to say I am never gonna get enough combustible fuel into the cylinder to push my EGTs out of a safe range with out a turbo?
Does extra cc's of fuel just represent more unburned fuel (IE no additional heat production). ?
Is the fuel curve the same? Can I just turn the 110 down to mimic the 90?
Devin
Does extra cc's of fuel just represent more unburned fuel (IE no additional heat production). ?
Is the fuel curve the same? Can I just turn the 110 down to mimic the 90?
Devin
If you are thinking about the 110cc and a higher flowing turbo than the stock Garrett, I would ask Justin about the prototype decompression head gaskets. Prior to install they measure 2.8mm and should lower the static compression ratio to ~18:1 without having to shave the pistons. That is the only way I would run a pump that big on a 6.9 (and with studs obviously). Some guys have been lucky and have gotten away with quite a bit on 7/16" fasteners, others have had HG problems at rather disappointing power and boost levels. I just would not take that chance.
#13
But is the argument that I can have these big performance pumps and control my throttle with a light foot even accurate? or beneficial? I like the idea of having power when I need it but on the other hand I don't want to dump money to find out I am burning fuel out the tail pipe as black smoke or HP I am not using.
Devin
Devin
#14
It also looks like all the pump up to the 90 are the same price, so I imagine they are all the same other than the calibrations. Is the calibration just the fuel screw? Could I buy say the 80, then dial it up to the 90 later down the road or are the calibrations more advanced than that? Could I do the same with the 110?
Devin
Devin
#15
There is a lot more to the calibration than just the fuel screw. The bigger pumps are calibrated for turbo use and take boost into account. There is no point at all in buying or running an IP that delivers more fuel than you can burn. If you need a pump now but can't afford the turbo you want right away then you can probably work around the over-fueling until you can afford the better turbo. But if your turbo plans are vague or distant, then right-size your pump for the air you have. If you have an 093, it can supply enough air for a 90cc. If you get, lets say the stage 1 turbo down the line, you will still gain over the Garrett because it is more efficient but it will only take you so far with the fuel you have. In general it is better to have an overkill turbo that will supply plenty of air than an overkill pump that supplies too much fuel. Really think about your future plans before you buy.