2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts

2nd Gen EcoBoost up to 450lb/ft torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 07-11-2016, 03:20 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,065
Received 437 Likes on 322 Posts
TFL Truck has updated thier information after a release by Ford. Now looks like 470 ft-lbs for the 2017 F150 3.5L EcoBoost engine.
Ford Out-torques Chevy with 375 HP and 470 LB-FT for the 2017 Ford F-150 Next Gen. 3.5L EcoBoost V6 [Updated] ? The Fast Lane Truck

You can read the press release from ford here as well:
https://media.ford.com/content/fordm...-best-in-.html
 
  #32  
Old 07-11-2016, 03:57 PM
elemint's Avatar
elemint
elemint is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: outback
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was thinking the opposite. Transmissions have Belen's Fords demise foot the last 30 years. From my experience, if you see 100 vehicles stuck on the side of the road with transmission failures, 80 of them will be fords.


Originally Posted by Larietpsd
I know this may sound a little silly but the only thing about this trans that scares me is that gm was involved!! And I mean that
 
  #33  
Old 07-11-2016, 04:08 PM
elemint's Avatar
elemint
elemint is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: outback
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed, I have had hydro 350's and 400's that were literally indestructible. My first car was a 76' TA and I don't think I ever came to a complete stop before going into forward or reverse. Aside from towing continuously I could not have done more to destroy that tranny. I sold it with 250k on it and it still ran great.



Originally Posted by YoGeorge
Rolls Royce used to use GM Turbo Hydramatic 400's in its cars because they were regarded as the best automatic transmissions available in their day. (They were also used on some Jaguars, Ferraris, and Bentleys.)

Powerglides are still widely used in modern drag race applications--although they are significantly modified.

I did have a '96 Savana van from hell with a 4L60E that got 7 new valve bodies and 3 new transmissions in 60k miles, however... I sold it very soon after my 60k warranty expired because of the trans and many other problems.

The Ford/GM joint FWD 6 speed has been mostly OK, with mostly software problems in its first couple years. (I believe it was introduced in 2007 in the Edge.) Interestingly, Ford and GM collaborated on the design(s), but each automaker builds its own transmissions. There is a lower torque version for the Escape and a bigger one for Edge and bigger vehicles.

The old Chrysler 727 Torqueflites were great for drag racing and sturdy, but I agree that their newer transmissions are troubled (and I just bought a Grand Caravan--for which I should buy an extended warranty).

BMW's should have manual transmissions I've got a '91 318is with a sweet Getrag 5 speed manual.

George
 
  #34  
Old 07-11-2016, 04:45 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,065
Received 437 Likes on 322 Posts
Well, maybe it's because I'm younger than some of you guys, or maybe I've just been lucky. Have never had transmission problems in a Ford.
 
  #35  
Old 07-11-2016, 05:06 PM
JKBrad's Avatar
JKBrad
JKBrad is offline
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 7,398
Received 804 Likes on 589 Posts
Originally Posted by elemint
I was thinking the opposite. Transmissions have Belen's Fords demise foot the last 30 years. From my experience, if you see 100 vehicles stuck on the side of the road with transmission failures, 80 of them will be fords.
Before the current 6 speeds came out in the F150s and the TorqShifts in the Super Duties, I would have to agree. As bad or worse were (are?) the Chrysler autos. I think the current Ford autos are the best on the market.
 
  #36  
Old 07-11-2016, 06:55 PM
srb1194's Avatar
srb1194
srb1194 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by seventyseven250
TFL Truck has updated thier information after a release by Ford. Now looks like 470 ft-lbs for the 2017 F150 3.5L EcoBoost engine.
Ford Out-torques Chevy with 375 HP and 470 LB-FT for the 2017 Ford F-150 Next Gen. 3.5L EcoBoost V6 [Updated] ? The Fast Lane Truck

You can read the press release from ford here as well:
https://media.ford.com/content/fordm...-best-in-.html
Boy it just keeps getting better. Less than a year from now I'll be driving one. Can't wait!
 
  #37  
Old 07-11-2016, 07:38 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,426
Received 671 Likes on 440 Posts
Well that's embarrassing. Release your next-gen numbers to much fanfare...wait a month and revise, all before production. Can they make up their mind already?
 
  #38  
Old 07-11-2016, 07:51 PM
srb1194's Avatar
srb1194
srb1194 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tom
Well that's embarrassing. Release your next-gen numbers to much fanfare...wait a month and revise, all before production. Can they make up their mind already?
Maybe the MPG numbers will do the same. I'm dreaming of course.
 
  #39  
Old 07-11-2016, 08:33 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,065
Received 437 Likes on 322 Posts
Much better than revising them downwards . . .
 
  #40  
Old 07-11-2016, 08:35 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,065
Received 437 Likes on 322 Posts
Maybe I missed it, but was there much or any change to the 2.7 engine?
 
  #41  
Old 07-11-2016, 08:42 PM
srb1194's Avatar
srb1194
srb1194 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As I understand it there is no change whatsoever to the 2.7 for 2017.
 
  #42  
Old 07-12-2016, 11:26 AM
Larietpsd's Avatar
Larietpsd
Larietpsd is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
That's definite on 93 octane
 
  #43  
Old 07-12-2016, 03:04 PM
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
GlueGuy is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2015
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,365
Received 213 Likes on 179 Posts
Or maybe you could take your "old" ecoboost and add a Heartthrob cat-back exhaust. Anyone have an opinion on this?

 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pilgrimbizket
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
6
04-30-2019 10:31 PM
woodlander
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
4
11-12-2010 07:01 PM
powerstrokef35007
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
5
03-03-2009 10:17 AM
ford390gashog
General Automotive Discussion
34
09-16-2004 08:43 AM
newbietoford
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
2
08-12-2003 05:27 PM



Quick Reply: 2nd Gen EcoBoost up to 450lb/ft torque



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM.