1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

How do you interpret this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 02-13-2016, 09:36 AM
56panelford's Avatar
56panelford
56panelford is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: northwestern Ontario
Posts: 263,002
Received 4,132 Likes on 2,656 Posts
Originally Posted by das54
Fun thread. I say the only thing more difficult than interpretation of this regulation will be enforcement. Here in the US we are innocent until proven guilty and proving when the current engine was installed in my truck will not be easy. And proving it is a 1998 or a 1978 SBC 350 isn't easy either without pulling it out. But no matter, Oregon is pretty green but they haven't threatened the hot rod hobbyist in the least.

I think the valve covers would be an indication between those years
 
  #47  
Old 02-13-2016, 12:41 PM
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
52 Merc is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Burbank, WA
Posts: 13,920
Received 2,449 Likes on 1,396 Posts
Speaking of California, a friend sent me this link I found interesting...
For Cam Newton, Adding Super Tax Insult to Super Bowl Injury | Cato @ Liberty
 
  #48  
Old 02-13-2016, 05:02 PM
Jolly Roger Joe's Avatar
Jolly Roger Joe
Jolly Roger Joe is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rockingham, VA
Posts: 6,599
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by 52 Merc
Speaking of California, a friend sent me this link I found interesting...
Please, let's not speak of Kalifornia...
 
  #49  
Old 02-13-2016, 07:21 PM
jerry_s's Avatar
jerry_s
jerry_s is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What does "K"alifornia stand for? I see it a lot, but all I ever find is a movie of the same name sake!

Anyways - I don't know if I should start another thread or slightly nudge the direction this one is already heading: when I first started I was s bit worried about building such an old vehicle because Denver residents had just defeated a bill to ban pre-catalytic vehicles from their city (Memory is a bit weak on this one - it could have been a different city or slightly different requirements). So I was worried about spending a lot of money on a vehicle I could only drive for a few more years. But, any thoughts on the likelihood of something like this article:

The Old Car Loophole: When Will It Close? | The American Spectator

Additionally, and a bit ironically, I just got an email from Summit Racing about how the EPA is trying to ban vehicles originally manufactured for the road from being converted to race vehicles - yet another push that worries me about building an expensive truck.
 
  #50  
Old 02-13-2016, 09:02 PM
abe's Avatar
abe
abe is online now
One Meadow Green Owner

Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Central PA
Posts: 22,180
Received 2,615 Likes on 1,456 Posts
Denver, Colorado..... wanting to ban pre-catalytic vehicles but they allow the legal sale of a weed that alters your mind with smoke that who knows what it does to your lungs.
 
  #51  
Old 02-13-2016, 09:06 PM
jerry_s's Avatar
jerry_s
jerry_s is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not just Colorado, the EPA is trying to ban people from using your car on a racetrack:

SEMA Action Network (SAN) AA2016FED1

Makes me a bit worried about this slippery slope. That previous link brought up some good points about the graying of the hobby - luckily for us that's the demographic most likely to vote!
 
  #52  
Old 02-13-2016, 09:32 PM
Jolly Roger Joe's Avatar
Jolly Roger Joe
Jolly Roger Joe is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rockingham, VA
Posts: 6,599
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by jerry_s
What does "K"alifornia stand for? I see it a lot, but all I ever find is a movie of the same name sake!
The Peoples Republik of Kalifornia. I see you live here too, Comrade. I'm leaving as soon as I can get out. Grew up in SoCal, have lived here continuously since 1960, but I can't stand it much longer. Won't be much longer before I'm a criminal simply because I own firearms.

And at the rate they're spending money they don't have, the state will be bankrupt soon. We really need to spend $68 billion on a high speed train that, if they could get 1,000 passengers a day, will take 216 years to break even at $86 a ticket.

Okay, I'm done. Sorry for the soap box.
 
  #53  
Old 02-14-2016, 04:08 PM
55 f350's Avatar
55 f350
55 f350 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: springfield il
Posts: 5,776
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Dain jolly if i didn't know any better i'd swear you lived here in illinois .......
 
  #54  
Old 02-15-2016, 05:47 PM
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Tedster9 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by das54
Here in the US we are innocent until proven guilty ...
Bwah ha ha! It's really cute somebody still believes that. You can argue for a presumption of innocence in a court of law, but regulatory agencies do whatever they want. The burden of proof will be on you.
 
  #55  
Old 02-15-2016, 07:27 PM
jerry_s's Avatar
jerry_s
jerry_s is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I should have kept the link, but the discussion on engines a page or two back had some paragraphs on the onus being on the owner to prove that the engine swap happened pre-99 or such, otherwise it would be assumed it was post 99.

Now, does that go against what most of us believe to be the letter and spirit of the law? I would argue yes, but how many of us have the money to fight it?
 
  #56  
Old 02-15-2016, 07:32 PM
CharlieLed's Avatar
CharlieLed
CharlieLed is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 7,867
Received 467 Likes on 303 Posts
I just saw on the news that a CA lawmaker has just introduced a law to require that a married man get a permission slip from his wife before getting a prescription for Viagra. What next???
 
  #57  
Old 02-15-2016, 09:23 PM
52 USCG Panel's Avatar
52 USCG Panel
52 USCG Panel is online now
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Deerbrook, WI
Posts: 3,571
Received 867 Likes on 423 Posts
Elections have consequences--We get the kind of government (and leaders) we vote for.
 
  #58  
Old 02-15-2016, 09:38 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,800
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
Originally Posted by CharlieLed
I just saw on the news that a CA lawmaker has just introduced a law to require that a married man get a permission slip from his wife before getting a prescription for Viagra. What next???
That's no joke! There was a piece in a magazine that old goats in their 70's are getting it, and their wives want no part of it. Also a problem in old folks' homes. Modern times... gotta love 'em.
 
  #59  
Old 02-15-2016, 09:53 PM
49f3dls's Avatar
49f3dls
49f3dls is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Southern SC.
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ALBUQ F-1
That's no joke! There was a piece in a magazine that old goats in their 70's are getting it, and their wives want no part of it. Also a problem in old folks' homes. Modern times... gotta love 'em.
"Old goats "we are going to resemble that statement very soon then you won't think of it as old!!!!!
 
  #60  
Old 02-15-2016, 09:57 PM
jerry_s's Avatar
jerry_s
jerry_s is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lawmaker files bill requiring men to have note from wife, other requirements to get Viagra

It's kind of a joke - the representative that introduced it (I could only find Kentucky) did it as a response to the bills other legislators introduced about abortion.

I had to look it up - it just seemed like something you'd find on the onion. Probably not a bad thing - if the government gets bogged down in ridiculous legislation, then maybe they'll leave the rest of us alone!
 


Quick Reply: How do you interpret this?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 AM.