Crower hydraulic lifters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-01-2016, 03:23 PM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Crower hydraulic lifters

Anyone ever use Crower hydraulic lifters? I got a cam kit from Crower and when I went to install the lifters noticed they're different than any others I've ever seen.

Every lifter I've seen the spring pushes the piston/plunger up against the retaining ring. With the Crower lifters the piston is loose - probably .1" down from the retainer - it rattles around when I shake the lifter.

I called Crower to talk with a tech about how to set the preload at the recommended .020-.050" below the retainer with the piston already .1" below the ring sitting on the spring. He said to pump them up first. Something I've heard you shouldn't do with new hydraulic lifters. Plus I'm not sure they would pump up without 40+ psi of oil pressure behind.

Anybody run into the same scenario with Crower lifters? How did you set the preload?
 
  #2  
Old 02-01-2016, 04:32 PM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Well for the record I tried pumping up one of the lifters and it did indeed work as intended. They really should include that sort of info in the cam booklet. Booklet didn't say anything about cleaning the cam lobes either.

Anyway, the preload is good now with the same shim I tried before pumping the lifter. A bit surprised it needs a .060" shim with just a resurfacing of the head and block.
 
  #3  
Old 02-01-2016, 04:41 PM
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
AbandonedBronco is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,937
Received 80 Likes on 73 Posts
That is interesting, I'm curious what about them works differently. Why the unique design?

As for the 0.060" shim, how much did you have shaved off to resurface?
 
  #4  
Old 02-03-2016, 12:25 PM
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
F-250 restorer is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Near Los Angeles
Posts: 6,574
Received 137 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by BaronVonAutomatc
Well for the record I tried pumping up one of the lifters and it did indeed work as intended. They really should include that sort of info in the cam booklet. Booklet didn't say anything about cleaning the cam lobes either.

Anyway, the preload is good now with the same shim I tried before pumping the lifter. A bit surprised it needs a .060" shim with just a resurfacing of the head and block.
Are you talking about shims for the v.springs? If so, that is not affected by shaving the head surface. Shims are used, and of course you know this. I'm just saying it to go through it in my mind. Shims are used to get the man. recommended installed height, which is separate and independent of the head surface. If you are changing the shims to get correct geometry of the v. train, meaning too long of p.rods because the height has now changed due to milling/cleaning, then you are going about it the wrong way. The installed height does not change to suit a long/short p.rod. You need to buy a p.rod of a diff. length. That geo. is easier checked using a roller rocker and the witness method--the tip of the valve coated with a marker and then cranking the engine one turn, and removing to see where the roller touched the valve. stem. That will show you too long/too short. Good luck.
 
  #5  
Old 02-03-2016, 01:13 PM
fordman75's Avatar
fordman75
fordman75 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: South central, Minnesota
Posts: 5,824
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by F-250 restorer
Are you talking about shims for the v.springs? If so, that is not affected by shaving the head surface. Shims are used, and of course you know this. I'm just saying it to go through it in my mind. Shims are used to get the man. recommended installed height, which is separate and independent of the head surface. If you are changing the shims to get correct geometry of the v. train, meaning too long of p.rods because the height has now changed due to milling/cleaning, then you are going about it the wrong way. The installed height does not change to suit a long/short p.rod. You need to buy a p.rod of a diff. length. That geo. is easier checked using a roller rocker and the witness method--the tip of the valve coated with a marker and then cranking the engine one turn, and removing to see where the roller touched the valve. stem. That will show you too long/too short. Good luck.
I believe he is referring to the shimming the pedestal mount rocker arms ( bolt in ) . That is a way to adjust preload & geometry without changing push rod length.
 
  #6  
Old 02-03-2016, 01:29 PM
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
AbandonedBronco is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,937
Received 80 Likes on 73 Posts
That's what I figured. The head dropped down, so you have to raise up the rocker arm just a touch to rebalance the geometry.
 
  #7  
Old 02-03-2016, 01:31 PM
seattle smitty's Avatar
seattle smitty
seattle smitty is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AbandonedBronco
That is interesting, I'm curious what about them works differently. Why the unique design?
Me too; are these the ones that are supposed to be like Rhoads lifters (intended to extend the torque band of a hot cam), but less noisy?
 
  #8  
Old 02-03-2016, 03:09 PM
IICAP's Avatar
IICAP
IICAP is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Deep River, CT.
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AbandonedBronco
That is interesting, I'm curious what about them works differently. Why the unique design?

As for the 0.060" shim, how much did you have shaved off to resurface?
Guys just want to mention that Ford offered standard, .060 longer and .060 shorter push rods for some engines with fixed, non adjustable rockers. The mention of the .060 shim made me think of it. Don't know if this info is of any use in this thread, but thought I'd add it. There is a window of clearance allowed between rocker and valve stem. When that gap is within spec, the plunger in the lifter is positioned correctly. There is a tool that goes on the rocker with a lever and you push all the oil out of the lifter to bottom the plunger then check the gap. Of course the engine has to be in position for particular cyls.

Reason for learning this, in the fleet I maintained, we bought a rebuilt 361 long block, it would not run right. Came down to some valves were not closing all the way. We found out about the different push rods and installed shorter pushrods where needed. There is a service manual procedure on this
 
  #9  
Old 02-03-2016, 05:56 PM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Referring to the rocker shims, yes. There was .020", tops, taken off the head and block so the big shims is weird. I'd rather have a wee bit too little preload than .040" too much.

These are the standard lifters that match Crower's Ford cams. The 12 that were water damaged all rattled just like the 16 I ordered.

I'm not sure they pumped up much anyway once the rocker was tight. Any oil would just squeeze up the pushrod. Priming the oil pump/system ought shore them up though.
 
  #10  
Old 02-04-2016, 11:30 PM
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
F-250 restorer is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Near Los Angeles
Posts: 6,574
Received 137 Likes on 117 Posts
Ah, my head is old style, with stud mount rockers, so that never occurred to me. Bonk. Of course.

Interesting. I had .020 taken off the block, and the same off the head, but b/c I used sbc valves, which are longer than the ford ones, I ended up having to get p.rods that were .250 longer than oem.
 
  #11  
Old 03-01-2016, 11:56 PM
dylansf23's Avatar
dylansf23
dylansf23 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
btw the rhoads one are a bitch you can literally push on them and lift them when the engine is off they are noisey, but they do work.

my engine has a complete different pitch around 1800rpms and up i have the older style they have newer ones that i assume are MUCH nicer they say the usual adjustment for rockers zero lash and then back a 1/4 turn i believe? either way i dont like it and as soon as i can im swapping them out with my factory brand new set and hoping i dont hurt anything
 
  #12  
Old 03-02-2016, 06:36 PM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Following up, I'll be replacing the Crower lifters with Melling lifters this weekend. I've reset the preload twice and even tried new rocker arms but a clatter in the rockers remains.

A quarter to half turn preload is a decent rule of thumb. Measuring with a dial indicator or by marking the pushrod at zero lash and when the rocker is torqued to spec is best.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BroncoBilli
Performance & General Engine Building
4
12-17-2017 04:18 PM
mabigredtruck
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
9
02-16-2010 11:05 AM
64fordf100292
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
07-25-2007 10:38 PM
black58
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
06-04-2006 09:21 PM
jeffbran
Performance & General Engine Building
5
04-28-2004 09:23 PM



Quick Reply: Crower hydraulic lifters



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 AM.