Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Ford V6 > 3.0L V6
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2004, 04:29 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 23
FRDAVE is starting off with a positive reputation.
Smile miles on 3.0

I have just turned 80,000 on my 2002 ranger xlt supercab ,still running like a top ..and it is a 3.0 v-6
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2004, 10:38 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: N. Alabama
Posts: 17
alm94 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I've got 126k on my '94. No problems here...all original parts.

And I'm averaging about 23.5 mpg (60 miles round-trip to work, mostly highway miles).
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2004, 07:36 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chambersburg, PA
Posts: 13
Mustanglover is starting off with a positive reputation.
Smile Good Mileage on 98 Windstar 3.0L

I own a 1998 Windstar with the 3.0L Vulcan motor in it. It has 158,000 miles on the original motor and transmission. This motor has been trouble free and has had only one tuneup ( at 120,000 miles). Oil has been changed every 4,000 miles and coolant has been changed twice. It does not even use any oil between changes at this point in time. I expect to get 200,000 miles out of this motor no problem. Definetely a lot better motor than the 3.8 liter motor which is also put in this vehicle. Head gaskets seem to be the big problem with the 3.8 liter motor.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2004, 10:25 PM
Rockledge's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,999
Rockledge has a very good reputation on FTE.Rockledge has a very good reputation on FTE.Rockledge has a very good reputation on FTE.Rockledge has a very good reputation on FTE.
Re: Good Mileage on 98 Windstar 3.0L

Quote:
Originally posted by Mustanglover
I own a 1998 Windstar with the 3.0L Vulcan motor in it. It has 158,000 miles on the original motor and transmission. This motor has been trouble free and has had only one tuneup ( at 120,000 miles). Oil has been changed every 4,000 miles and coolant has been changed twice. It does not even use any oil between changes at this point in time. I expect to get 200,000 miles out of this motor no problem. Definetely a lot better motor than the 3.8 liter motor which is also put in this vehicle. Head gaskets seem to be the big problem with the 3.8 liter motor.
Welcome aboard!

Those oil changes every 4K are indeed going to reward you in the long run. I like to change my coolant more often, though, probably every 15-20K or so.

You're right, the 3.8L "Essex" is unfortunately very prone to head gasket failure, but when it isn't popping gaskets, it does deliver some very decent torque (I used to own a '93 Sable w/3.8L and fortunately never had a HG problem).

BTW, as long as I'm posting, I may as well update the mileage on my Vulcan ...it is now at 100,100.
__________________
'98 Ranger XLT 4x4 (4.0L)
'97 Taurus GL (3.0L Vulcan)
'94 Taurus SHO (MTX)
Ford Pics

Last edited by Rockledge : 02-02-2004 at 10:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2004, 10:55 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: McDonald PA
Posts: 5
cfwez is starting off with a positive reputation.
120'000 miles on my 1999 3.0 4WD Sport Regular Cab. She doesn't use any oil between changes.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2004, 08:51 AM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 28
Shabonna_RR is starting off with a positive reputation.
I notice the comments about Head Gasket problems on the 3.8/4.0 V6. I,ve only had one of these engines, in a 1993 Mercury Marquis, and never had any problems with it. Conventional Wisdom then was to keep the oil changed to prevent the oil return passages from the heads from clogging (I had to pour oil in mine slowly to keep it from overflowing at the filler opening)

However, I had a 1984 Plymouth Voyager with the Mitsubishi 2.6 4-cyl engine, and these were notorious for blowing the head gasket on the outside of the #4 cylinder, mine included. Through trial and error, I found I had to re-torque the head every 8000 miles or so, because the aluminum head would loosen on the cast block. I never replaced a head gasket after that.

I don't know if this will help 3.8/4.0 owners or not. Comments?

Bob Nicholson
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2004, 08:49 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3
martin_1962 is starting off with a positive reputation.
91+ on my 2000 Ford Ranger and still going strong...
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2004, 10:33 AM
Rockledge's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,999
Rockledge has a very good reputation on FTE.Rockledge has a very good reputation on FTE.Rockledge has a very good reputation on FTE.Rockledge has a very good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally posted by SHABBONA_RR
I notice the comments about Head Gasket problems on the 3.8L... However, I had a 1984 Plymouth Voyager with the Mitsubishi 2.6 4-cyl engine, and these were notorious for blowing the head gasket on the outside of the #4 cylinder, mine included. Through trial and error, I found I had to re-torque the head every 8000 miles or so, because the aluminum head would loosen on the cast block. I never replaced a head gasket after that.

I don't know if this will help 3.8/4.0 owners or not. Comments?

Bob Nicholson
Bob that's a good question you brought up. I do think that re-torquing the headbolts regularly would help extend the life of a 3.8L headgasket, but I honestly don't think it's a complete solution. And that's because a lot of the problems with the 3.8L HG was/is design and construction of the OEM gasket itself (even the early replacements were weak). And IMO, the 3.8L Sable/Taurus also had a less-than-ideal cooling system design which caused the engine (and tranny, which of course runs cooling lines through the radiator) to run hot all the time, increasing the liklihood of greater metal expansion & cooling disparities between the different metals.

In contrast, my '94 SHO engine, built by Yamaha, has big aluminum heads (24v) and a cast iron block, and yet head gasket issues are few and far in between on these motors, a result of different gaskets and a cooler running engine by design. And these days, on the more modern engines, mating aluminum heads to iron blocks is rarely cause for concern, head-gasket-wise. This is because of better design and construction of the HG's themselves, and also better design of the engines in general. At least that's how I see it.

__________________
'98 Ranger XLT 4x4 (4.0L)
'97 Taurus GL (3.0L Vulcan)
'94 Taurus SHO (MTX)
Ford Pics
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2004, 11:09 PM
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,375
dono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud of
It is time for my annual oil change for my '99 . I replace the Mobil l and filter every February. I drive it a little over 3K a year, just turned 15,000. It's my toy.
__________________
Dono
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2004, 09:44 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Homer, Alaska
Posts: 1,221
hreed is starting off with a positive reputation.
95 Ranger, 135k. Uses about 1/2 qt between 5k oil changes. I love this truck!
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2004, 02:45 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4
ASSAULTCLIMBER is starting off with a positive reputation.
miles on my 3.0

I am up to 102500 on my 3.0L It's a 2000 ford ranger.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2004, 12:24 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32
patrickgw is starting off with a positive reputation.
just shy of 300,000 KM on my '96 no major work, but the gear shifter if getting shacky under load.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2004, 07:09 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 4
Paul_5.4 is starting off with a positive reputation.
200,000 km on my 93, and has given me no problems yet. Great little truck.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2004, 08:12 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32
patrickgw is starting off with a positive reputation.
a fellow nova scotian
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2004, 09:10 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 4
Paul_5.4 is starting off with a positive reputation.
fellow nova scotian

we're everywhere
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy