Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

2010 versus 2011

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-20-2016, 09:36 AM
TheNewman's Avatar
TheNewman
TheNewman is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 117
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 versus 2011

Is there any real advantage to getting a 2011/2012 over a 2009/2010? I found a good deal on a 2010 FX4 but not sure what the differences are other than the 5.0/3.5 and the onboard computer/screen is 1000% more useful in 2011+. My budget puts the 2009s within reach that have a decent amount of options but I'd need to wait to put a 2011/2012 within reach. Just weighing my options and what I should do.
 
  #2  
Old 01-21-2016, 04:59 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,132
Received 1,219 Likes on 802 Posts
In 2010, Ford upgraded the brakes, added electric cooling fans and made some software changes to adjust transmission shifting and help with it's quirkiness. Obviously slight changes and adjustments happen each year but 2011 brought about the largest changes, as you've already illustrated.
 
  #3  
Old 01-21-2016, 09:04 AM
TheNewman's Avatar
TheNewman
TheNewman is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 117
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should I be scared to buy a 2011 Eco with 100K miles?
 
  #4  
Old 01-21-2016, 09:09 AM
WXboy's Avatar
WXboy
WXboy is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Central KY
Posts: 3,342
Received 335 Likes on 203 Posts
5.0 is WAY easier to work on under the hood. It also makes more power and uses less fuel. Those things alone would make it worth skipping a 5.4 truck to me. Those 5.4s eat cam phasers and chain guides for breakfast. Unless price difference is significant, I'd go 2011+
 
  #5  
Old 01-21-2016, 09:10 AM
boost4life's Avatar
boost4life
boost4life is offline
New User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have an eco with 80k runs Great! But the eco's and 5.0 are way easier to work on vs the 5.4
 
  #6  
Old 01-21-2016, 02:38 PM
TheNewman's Avatar
TheNewman
TheNewman is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 117
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the comments. I ended up passing on the 2010. The interior and paint were beautiful but the underside and engine compartment were super crusty. The truck was originally from Canada so I think it was under coated in the last year to hide the salt damage. There was one spot where it had come off and it looked just as bad as my 2003 Ranger.

My goal is a 2011/2012 FX4 with the 5.0. I'd love the Ecoboost but not sure I want to own one in the 100,000-200,000 mile time period.
 
  #7  
Old 01-21-2016, 04:23 PM
kameronth's Avatar
kameronth
kameronth is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 1,927
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by TheNewman
Thanks for the comments. I ended up passing on the 2010. The interior and paint were beautiful but the underside and engine compartment were super crusty. The truck was originally from Canada so I think it was under coated in the last year to hide the salt damage. There was one spot where it had come off and it looked just as bad as my 2003 Ranger.

My goal is a 2011/2012 FX4 with the 5.0. I'd love the Ecoboost but not sure I want to own one in the 100,000-200,000 mile time period.
Don't rule out the 6.2 for 2011. I love mine!
 
  #8  
Old 01-22-2016, 02:10 PM
TheNewman's Avatar
TheNewman
TheNewman is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 117
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure the 6.2 would a lot of fun... But I don't really need it. Hell, I really don't need a V8 but... What fun is that? haha

I found another 2010 in my price range. The only thing this one is missing is the back up camera. I think that could be added so I might go make a low offer.

2010 FX4, leather, sunroof, brake controler, 5.4, black on black, 107K miles can be had for $20K.
 
  #9  
Old 01-24-2016, 06:54 PM
Trailblazen's Avatar
Trailblazen
Trailblazen is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 664
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Don't rule out eco's. Mine is running great at 85k. Not to mention there's a whole thread on over 100k ecos. Can't beat the power of the eco. I do miss the V8 growl though. Thing is I'd never buy a 5.4 again. The newer motors out match it by leaps and bounds.
 
  #10  
Old 01-24-2016, 07:01 PM
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx
AlaskanEx is offline
Bleed Ford Blue

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 13,574
Received 128 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by kameronth
Don't rule out the 6.2 for 2011. I love mine!
This guy knows what he's talkin about!
 
  #11  
Old 01-24-2016, 07:14 PM
Bruzz's Avatar
Bruzz
Bruzz is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea... Spend a little extra money for the 2011!
 
  #12  
Old 01-24-2016, 07:48 PM
Trailblazen's Avatar
Trailblazen
Trailblazen is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 664
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
I have to admit the 6.2L is in a class of its own at the top of the Ford Engine Pyramid. It wasn't an option for me but if you can find one.....jump on it.
 
  #13  
Old 01-24-2016, 08:27 PM
paredneck33's Avatar
paredneck33
paredneck33 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: penn twp.
Posts: 3,485
Received 49 Likes on 41 Posts
FWIW I bought my 2011 F150 XLT 4x4 off road packaged 5.0 in Sept. 2014 with 35k on the clock for $26k. Look around and shop wise. You should be able to find an 11-14 truck with close to what you want for a price you can afford. However at this time of year 4x4's are in high demand. And funny thing is while the wife and I were working on finalizing the deal on my truck, another guy and his teenage son came into the dealership want to look at the truck and take it for a test drive. The look on their faces when they found out they were too late was priceless.
 
  #14  
Old 01-24-2016, 11:34 PM
brokenleg's Avatar
brokenleg
brokenleg is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,493
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by AlaskanEx
This guy knows what he's talkin about!
I have the 6.2 as well, its a very good motor. only bad thing about it its hard on gas. (But then I don't use either one of my trucks as a daily driver) and I think an F150 with a 6.2 is a rare truck.
 
  #15  
Old 01-25-2016, 12:24 AM
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx
AlaskanEx is offline
Bleed Ford Blue

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 13,574
Received 128 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by brokenleg
I have the 6.2 as well, its a very good motor. only bad thing about it its hard on gas. (But then I don't use either one of my trucks as a daily driver) and I think an F150 with a 6.2 is a rare truck.
Compared to my V10 Excursion ( 8 MPG personal license plate ) which I drove 30 miles daily before getting my 6.2 F-150, the 6.2 is like a Prius!! I hit almost exactly my EPA numbers listed on my window sticker of 12 city / 13 mixed / 16 Highway
 


Quick Reply: 2010 versus 2011



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.