When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Just saw your thread, thanks for sharing all of the updates! I really like those wheels, what size are you going with? Also, sucks about your cards man, I hope it all got fixed.
Just saw your thread, thanks for sharing all of the updates! I really like those wheels, what size are you going with? Also, sucks about your cards man, I hope it all got fixed.
Thanks man. I'm going to run 15x8 up front and 15x10 in the rear. And luckily my card issue got sorted out.
Finally got the frame sand blasted and most of the holes welded up plus the the nuts welded on for the holes I need to keep. Started boxing the frame and got most of it primed.
I'm rebuilding my 53 f100 stock, but I enjoy following the builds of those folks doing radical modifications. I've been curious about frame "boxing". I've seen how much my own frame can twist, especially on uneven terrain. I assume that the Ford engineers were aware of this twisting, and they accounted for it in the overall frame design. It seems to me that "boxing" would redistribute forces acting on the frame, especially torsional, differently. I don't have a mental picture of the flow of forces through the frame, but, everything else being equal,wouldn't boxing tend to concentrate forces at points on the frame not intended to adequately resist them? What forces on the frame is "boxing" supposed to handle? Maybe if these boxed frames trucks are going to spend the rest of their lives on absolutely flat pavement this isn't an issue.. Just curious
I'm rebuilding my 53 f100 stock, but I enjoy following the builds of those folks doing radical modifications. I've been curious about frame "boxing". I've seen how much my own frame can twist, especially on uneven terrain. I assume that the Ford engineers were aware of this twisting, and they accounted for it in the overall frame design. It seems to me that "boxing" would redistribute forces acting on the frame, especially torsional, differently. I don't have a mental picture of the flow of forces through the frame, but, everything else being equal,wouldn't boxing tend to concentrate forces at points on the frame not intended to adequately resist them? What forces on the frame is "boxing" supposed to handle? Maybe if these boxed frames trucks are going to spend the rest of their lives on absolutely flat pavement this isn't an issue.. Just curious
Boxing the frame is necessary if you are going to run independent front and rear suspension. You need the extra strength do to everything being concentrated on to 4 specific load points on the frame. With the original leaf spring and solid axle set up the energy transfer to the frame was spread out over a wider area.
Made some good progress today. I welded in the jag ifs crossmember, then made the front boxing plates. Almost finished welding them up until I ran out of welding gas. I also managed to tac one of the original crossmembers back in place. Hopefully next weekend I'll get the front suspension finished up and I can start on the rear suspension setup.
Tonight I got a couple of hours in to work on the truck. I got the rear cross member fabricated for the rear end tonight. Should get it welded in this weekend.
Tonight I got the rear center section welded in place. Next I need to get the upper cool over mount fabricated. I also rebuilt the lower control arm ball joints. I should have the front and rear suspension finished soon.