2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts

2016 Price Increase

  #31  
Old 01-04-2016, 07:47 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,060
Received 435 Likes on 320 Posts
since the 2015 production started pretty late at KC, makes some sense to run it longer. They don't want to report a year of low sales, so they need to produce more trucks to sell.
 
  #32  
Old 01-04-2016, 09:34 PM
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Bullitt390 is offline
Certified Thread Hijacker

Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,433
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by seventyseven250
since the 2015 production started pretty late at KC, makes some sense to run it longer. They don't want to report a year of low sales, so they need to produce more trucks to sell.
Honestly there was no reason to keep issuing 2015 VINs after August.

Josh
 
  #33  
Old 01-04-2016, 10:02 PM
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
GlueGuy is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2015
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,359
Received 211 Likes on 177 Posts
Originally Posted by Bullitt390
Honestly there was no reason to keep issuing 2015 VINs after August.

Josh
It does make sense if Ford didn't want to suspend production altogether. By phasing the model year change-over, they can continue production in KC while Dearborn is tooling for the new models. You end up with a few more of the 2015 models, but it doesn't result in a product drought while both plants switch over at the same time.

I know if I was in charge of production, I would phase in the switch-over across however many plants I had to do it with.
 
  #34  
Old 01-04-2016, 10:20 PM
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Bullitt390 is offline
Certified Thread Hijacker

Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,433
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by GlueGuy
It does make sense if Ford didn't want to suspend production altogether. By phasing the model year change-over, they can continue production in KC while Dearborn is tooling for the new models. You end up with a few more of the 2015 models, but it doesn't result in a product drought while both plants switch over at the same time.

I know if I was in charge of production, I would phase in the switch-over across however many plants I had to do it with.
I believe it's hurt sales. People are accustomed to next year's vehicles debuting late summer. To have the dealer lots full of 2015s in October and November with no 2016s doesn't look good.

I'm not the only one that has scoffed at buying an "old" 2015 and instead ordered a 2016.

Josh
 
  #35  
Old 01-04-2016, 11:04 PM
Dim Sum's Avatar
Dim Sum
Dim Sum is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Annandale, VA
Posts: 2,130
Received 32 Likes on 15 Posts
Well, the fact that the 16s have Sync 3 is enough to justify waiting on the 2016 if you're buying a higher trimmed truck.

The reviews of Sync 3 are very positive.
 
  #36  
Old 01-05-2016, 04:40 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,125
Received 1,218 Likes on 801 Posts
Originally Posted by Bullitt390
I believe it's hurt sales. People are accustomed to next year's vehicles debuting late summer. To have the dealer lots full of 2015s in October and November with no 2016s doesn't look good.

I'm not the only one that has scoffed at buying an "old" 2015 and instead ordered a 2016.

Josh
Yes sir but Ford didn't ship the dealer's 2009's till January 2009 and they pulled this mess again in 2015. Even though the order banks were open, dealer inventories weren't robust till 3 months after all the other car makers had their new models out.

So in effect, the 2009 and 2015 F-150's only enjoyed nine months of sales from dealer stock before the new model year was rolling.
 
  #37  
Old 01-05-2016, 10:51 AM
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
GlueGuy is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2015
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,359
Received 211 Likes on 177 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom
The 36-gallon fuel tank was a $295 option on my truck, and it was built in February. Sometime between then and now it's increased to $395 on the same MY 15 truck.
My truck was built in May, and the sticker says I paid $395.

It's still worth it IMO.
 
  #38  
Old 01-06-2016, 07:56 AM
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz
Frantz is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Lewisberry, Penn
Posts: 2,775
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
It's still worth it IMO.
Frankly that's what matters.
 
  #39  
Old 01-06-2016, 08:18 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,424
Received 671 Likes on 440 Posts
I agree, I'd pay $395 for it. Come to think of it, I'd rather pay that for the fuel tank than the $470 the E-locker set me back. Not that it's not a neat toy and all, but I really can't imagine that I'll use it much. Don't remember using it in my '13.
 
  #40  
Old 01-07-2016, 05:30 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,125
Received 1,218 Likes on 801 Posts
After I test drove the '16 KR and finished leaving my DNA in the form of drool all over the truck, I did go through the Monroney sticker line by line.

Admittedly, the line by line price didn't matter anymore, it was the bottom line that got my full attention. The truck had the 3.31 Elocker and the $395 long range tank. The fact that the tank was there made the line price just not matter. My focus was on the $63K+ and how I'd go about whittling that down if I were serious about this rig.

As for the tank itself, my 2011 eco has the standard 26 gallon tank that came on the previous gen trucks. The long range tank wasn't available on the eco trucks till 2012. I would have loved to have been able to increase my cruising range by another 200+ miles. If I towed anything, it would be even more important.
 
  #41  
Old 01-07-2016, 07:30 AM
JKBrad's Avatar
JKBrad
JKBrad is offline
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 7,389
Received 799 Likes on 585 Posts
You wouldn't believe how many King Ranch and Platinum trucks are on the road down here. Obviously Ford has no trouble moving them. For left over '15s, the rebates are half as much for the fancy trucks as they are for an XLT.

I would think it would take about $57k to buy a '16 model truck that stickers at $63k.
 
  #42  
Old 01-07-2016, 07:48 AM
cwtex04's Avatar
cwtex04
cwtex04 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 474
Received 140 Likes on 68 Posts
Just bought a 2016 KR 4x4 , 6.5 bed ,max tow 3.5EB with everything you can think of . Sticker was 65 ,they dropped 8k off of the sticker . I got 31,500 for my 2011 KR F250 4x4 ,6.7, with 82,000 on it. I was happy with the deal and got 2.24 interest on top of that. Deals are out there if your willing to look.




cwtex04
 
  #43  
Old 01-07-2016, 08:04 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,424
Received 671 Likes on 440 Posts
Thanks for the data cwtex04, good to see they are dealing on the higher trim levels.

Originally Posted by tseekins
. The fact that the tank was there made the line price just not matter. My focus was on the $63K+ and how I'd go about whittling that down if I were serious about this rig
I'd love an optioned up truck like that, but at this point I can't afford that much truck. I paid a little over half of that MSRP for my XLT crew cab, and I'm quite happy with it. Pick a more reasonably priced truck, work out a deal, and pitch your wife a number in the 30's.
 
  #44  
Old 01-07-2016, 11:58 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,125
Received 1,218 Likes on 801 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom
Thanks for the data cwtex04, good to see they are dealing on the higher trim levels.



I'd love an optioned up truck like that, but at this point I can't afford that much truck. I paid a little over half of that MSRP for my XLT crew cab, and I'm quite happy with it. Pick a more reasonably priced truck, work out a deal, and pitch your wife a number in the 30's.
With my kids grown and gone and I can swing it now that I have a solid trade with 2011 truck but damn, $63K for a truck just doesn't sit well with me.

For $63K, we could get his and her Fusions, well equipped and keep my beautiful XLT.
 
  #45  
Old 01-08-2016, 09:55 PM
Scott Stielow16's Avatar
Scott Stielow16
Scott Stielow16 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Aiea, Hawaii
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I noticed the price increase at the beginning of last year 2015. I just decided to wait until the end of year sales. In November is when i bought my 2015 F150 with all the discounts came to about $9,000 off compaired to the beginning of the year. I'm happy the way everything worked out this last year.
Scott
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2016 Price Increase



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.