6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

Fiat-Crysler goat tough recall!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-27-2015, 06:29 PM
bocomojoe's Avatar
bocomojoe
bocomojoe is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Fiat-Crysler goat tough recall!!

How many are being recalled? I felt that I just had to post something when I saw this
 
  #2  
Old 07-27-2015, 06:38 PM
Dakster's Avatar
Dakster
Dakster is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 9,838
Received 111 Likes on 37 Posts
Looks like about 500,000 Ram trucks so far.

And the scary part for those that like Dodges....

Will these repurchased cars end up in circulation?
Some will. FCA "may remedy and resell any vehicle repurchased" under the buyback program, according to NHTSA's consent order. The automaker intends to do that for the vehicles it will buy back, Mayne said.
 
  #3  
Old 07-27-2015, 06:42 PM
kper05's Avatar
kper05
kper05 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,595
Received 75 Likes on 60 Posts
Injuries being a different, serious subject, I wish we could point and laugh but Ford has had their fair share. (This is limited to the joking fun of picking on each other of the big three.) Although this is a new level of recall...an entire buyback? This is going to be costly. Sadly for the owners, it isn't the full price as it doesn't include depreciation so the owner still loses since the cost of a new truck is even more than it was 5+ years ago.
 
  #4  
Old 07-27-2015, 06:45 PM
Dakster's Avatar
Dakster
Dakster is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 9,838
Received 111 Likes on 37 Posts
According to the news article I read it will only $2.5 Billion if 1/4 of the cars in the program are bought back... REMEMBER they get to resell them though...

So that means if they all were bought back it could top $10 Billion.

That doesn't count the $105 million in fines or the people that get trade in assistance and $100 gift cards.

--

Yes, Ford and GM also have their no recall issues when known problems exist issues too. So we don't point and laugh.
 
  #5  
Old 07-27-2015, 06:49 PM
69cj's Avatar
69cj
69cj is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Middle Tn.
Posts: 13,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by kper05
Injuries being a different, serious subject, I wish we could point and laugh but Ford has had their fair share. This is limited to the joking fun of picking on each other of the big three. Although this is a new level of recall...an entire buyback? This is going to be costly. Sadly for the owners, it isn't the full price as it doesn't include depreciation so the owner still loses since the cost of a new truck is even more than it was 5+ years ago.
I'm a Ford fan but remember the Pinto gas tank fiasco that today would cost them a major bundle. This penalty is a sign of the times that should have happened decades ago. GM is also in the same closet as is Toyota and probably many that we don't know about.
 
  #6  
Old 07-27-2015, 06:53 PM
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Tedster9 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes on 65 Posts
Interesting that so many remove the fuel tank from inside the cab on the vintage trucks, mainly for perceived safety, seems this may well be completely mistaken,
 
  #7  
Old 07-27-2015, 07:06 PM
kper05's Avatar
kper05
kper05 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,595
Received 75 Likes on 60 Posts
This thread was the first I heard about this. Now that I'm catching up, what a mess.
 
  #8  
Old 07-27-2015, 07:10 PM
JWC 3's Avatar
JWC 3
JWC 3 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,859
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Think I will just keep driving my 78 .....
 
  #9  
Old 07-27-2015, 07:13 PM
69cj's Avatar
69cj
69cj is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Middle Tn.
Posts: 13,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Tedster9
Interesting that so many remove the fuel tank from inside the cab on the vintage trucks, mainly for perceived safety, seems this may well be completely mistaken,
Actually the tanks inside the cab were a bigger fiasco and then in 73 GM moved them outside the frame rail under the body. Side collisions were very intertaining if you weren't the ones in the truck.
 
  #10  
Old 07-27-2015, 07:14 PM
chadjones99's Avatar
chadjones99
chadjones99 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: arizona
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
what was the recall for I seen a few burbs on the news about it but now they are back on the TRUMP subject.. this could cause them to go out of business thats a lot of money hate to have their stock right now
 
  #11  
Old 07-27-2015, 07:45 PM
lwk362393's Avatar
lwk362393
lwk362393 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: North Shore MA
Posts: 337
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by chadjones99
what was the recall for I seen a few burbs on the news about it but now they are back on the TRUMP subject.. this could cause them to go out of business thats a lot of money hate to have their stock right now
Fiat Chrysler Must Buy Back Hundreds of Thousands of Ram Pickups - NBC News

I didn't know this until now either. Seems pretty bad...
 
  #12  
Old 07-27-2015, 08:13 PM
kper05's Avatar
kper05
kper05 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,595
Received 75 Likes on 60 Posts
Fiat is huge. This won't be a business killer but it'll be painful for them.
 
  #13  
Old 07-27-2015, 08:52 PM
JWC 3's Avatar
JWC 3
JWC 3 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,859
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by 69cj
Actually the tanks inside the cab were a bigger fiasco and then in 73 GM moved them outside the frame rail under the body. Side collisions were very intertaining if you weren't the ones in the truck.
I actually got a notice from GM years ago about that .
They offered me $500 towards the purchase of a new truck !
 
  #14  
Old 07-27-2015, 09:53 PM
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Tedster9 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes on 65 Posts
Yeah moving fuel tanks like that seems crazy. Although, bad things happen during crashes, no way around it. Modern cars and trucks are waaay better! Usually.

What happened with the Pinto, I seem to recall (it's been a long time) something about the fuel filler tube shearing off in a crash or something like that, resulting in a fire after gasoline sprays over the hot exhaust.

A small design change or metal plate was suggested, cost just a few bucks. Well internal documents were produced showing that the bean counters figured it would cost on balance, less to fight any lawsuits in court, than spend an extra $5 bucks per car. I think that's what really made them look bad.
 
  #15  
Old 07-27-2015, 10:51 PM
Dim Sum's Avatar
Dim Sum
Dim Sum is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Annandale, VA
Posts: 2,130
Received 32 Likes on 15 Posts
This actually could raise used truck prices for trucks that aren't recalled . . .

I'm not surprised. In the days of this recall, Chrysler didn't make anything worth buying.
 


Quick Reply: Fiat-Crysler goat tough recall!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.