Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ECT/ACT Error

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-23-2015, 04:35 PM
Zorfox's Avatar
Zorfox
Zorfox is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ECT/ACT Error

My '91 F150 5.0 recently started stalling at red lights and a "valve rattle" with moderate acceleration.


I read the codes and I got 41 (HEGO), 33 (EGR), 51 (ECT/ACT). I removed and cleaned the EGR (the position sensor passed testing), reconnected the O2 sensor which had became disconnected and replaced the ACT sensor despite passing tests. The ECT is maybe 3 months old and passed tests as well.

After this the driveability issue was resolved and KOEO test was clear. I disconnected the battery to reset the KAM. All was well for 4-5 driving cycles.

Today the truck did the same thing. I checked the KOEO code and got a code 51 again (ECT/ACT). I also get a code 44 (thermactor) with KOER test. However, the metal tube had rusted off long ago so I assume this is not a problem.

I tested the new ACT and ECT. Both were in range and had 4.6 volts to them. I'm at a loss of what to do next. Any ideas?
 
  #2  
Old 07-23-2015, 05:56 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,922
Likes: 0
Received 962 Likes on 762 Posts
Was the engine at operating temp when you pulled the codes? If not you will always get the ECT/ACT codes and can ignore them.

The thermactor tube rusted off could be bad depending when it's separated, if it's upstream of the O2 sensor then it could allow fresh air into the exhaust system which will mess with the O2 sensor and result in a lean running condition.. which is what causes detonation under load aka.. that "valve rattle" you hear.
 
  #3  
Old 07-23-2015, 06:34 PM
Zorfox's Avatar
Zorfox
Zorfox is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes. All the codes were run when the engine temp was warm.

The "metal tube" is the one that runs from the rubber hose and solenoids directly behind the engine to the downstream side of the O2 sensor. All I did was weld a seal over the opening on the CAT. This was a few years ago. I assume the CAT could become clogged as a result but the engine vacuum is around 52 and rock solid stable so I doubt my CAT is plugged.
 
  #4  
Old 07-23-2015, 07:20 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,585
Received 1,164 Likes on 919 Posts
Originally Posted by Zorfox
I assume the CAT could become clogged as a result but the engine vacuum is around 52 and rock solid stable so I doubt my CAT is plugged.
52? really
 
  #5  
Old 07-24-2015, 02:19 AM
ifrythings's Avatar
ifrythings
ifrythings is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 84 Likes on 67 Posts
How exactly are you measuring this sensor? One wire should be 5v and the other should be 3.xx volts when cold and drop as the engine warms up. This is with the sensor plugged in back probing it, if your getting 4.6v out of it when warm unplug it and see what you get, if it doesn't change you have a short, if it does change you have a bad sensor.

Edit: 4.6v is -50 that's why it's complaining


 
  #6  
Old 07-24-2015, 12:30 PM
Zorfox's Avatar
Zorfox
Zorfox is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ifrythings
How exactly are you measuring this sensor? One wire should be 5v and the other should be 3.xx volts when cold and drop as the engine warms up. This is with the sensor plugged in back probing it, if your getting 4.6v out of it when warm unplug it and see what you get, if it doesn't change you have a short, if it does change you have a bad sensor.

Edit: 4.6v is -50 that's why it's complaining
Good advise here. Thank you.

I followed my haynes manual for testing. To test voltage it says to remove the connector and test for voltage using both wires on the connector for + and -. I got 4.6 volts doing that. Then I removed the sensor and tested the resistance when it was in water that I measured with a thermometer, cold and hot. The values were accurate for the temperatures.

After reading your post I back-probed each wire while connected. (btw, I have to get a piercing probe! That was hard to back probe. I ended up using a needle lol). The gray wire was 4.6 volts. The green wire was 0.024 volts hot AND cold!

I replaced the sensor and ran the KOEO test. No codes now. The voltage on the green wire when the engine was hot was 0.9 volts NOT 0.02. So I assume that was the problem. Time will tell I suppose. At least advance auto replaced the part under warranty.

Thanks again. This taught me a lesson about testing these types of sensors. The procedure in the Haynes manual is clearly not conclusive.

Originally Posted by rla2005
52? really
Sorry. 52 cm Hg NOT in Hg. in Hg would be about 20. I thought a steady drop to zero would suggest a clogged CAT. Although we now know my test procedures aren't exactly accurate lol
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Deltawolf81
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
02-27-2018 12:34 PM
Duckman77
1997-2006 Expedition & Navigator
2
05-13-2013 08:37 PM
bigwillie
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator
13
07-03-2006 12:28 PM
fazang
Bronco II
6
04-19-2005 07:28 PM
neil52
1997 - 2003 F150
3
01-16-2005 03:25 PM



Quick Reply: ECT/ACT Error



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM.