1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

302 vs 351

  #1  
Old 07-08-2015, 09:56 PM
Four.on.the.floor's Avatar
Four.on.the.floor
Four.on.the.floor is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
302 vs 351

which would make more power a 302 with new heads with a 63cc chamber and a mild cam or a stock mid 90's 351 roller?

I have a 302 with gt-40 heads on it and have a 9:5 comrpession ratio. and want to either put in a larger flat tappet cam

or just swap in a 351 and bolt on the gt-40 heads on it ?

which would make more power a 302 cammed and heads
or a 351 with just the heads ?

thinking about motor work for the winter
 
  #2  
Old 07-09-2015, 06:28 AM
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Franklin2 is online now
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 53,581
Likes: 0
Received 1,658 Likes on 1,341 Posts
The 302 may make more peak horsepower at a higher rpm. But that's not much use in a heavy truck made to work. The 351w is a superior when installed in a truck but it may not win the numbers game.
 
  #3  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:04 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Franklin2
The 302 may make more peak horsepower at a higher rpm. But that's not much use in a heavy truck made to work. The 351w is a superior when installed in a truck but it may not win the numbers game.
Amen! As long as you stay with normally-aspirated engines, the old saying of "There is no replacement for displacement" is fairly accurate. A longer stroke gives more mechanical advantage, aka "leverage", resulting in more torque. And torque is what moves things, not horsepower.
 
  #4  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:16 AM
Four.on.the.floor's Avatar
Four.on.the.floor
Four.on.the.floor is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok. ive been doing alot of research about looking and turning a 96 351 over to a carb setup.
 
  #5  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:25 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Something like an Eddy intake and carb plus a DS-II (blue grommet) ignition would be a good setup. In fact, the 1406 you have would be excellent.
 
  #6  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:45 AM
Four.on.the.floor's Avatar
Four.on.the.floor
Four.on.the.floor is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have not looked into specific dizzys yet but why do you suggest the blue grommet one. just wondering
 
  #7  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:59 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
The DuraSpark ignition box, which mounts on the fender, has the grommet - not the distributor. But, the distributor does need match the DS box.

There are several different DS boxes, and the color of the grommet where the wires come out tells which box it is. The box with a blue grommet is the standard one that does not require a computer. So you need a matching distributor and wiring harness and away you go. Your '82 may have the right stuff, but I doubt it as all the 82's I've been around had a tan or yellow grommet and a computer under the driver's seat. If yours is that way you'll have to source the stuff from an earlier truck.
 
  #8  
Old 07-09-2015, 09:15 AM
Four.on.the.floor's Avatar
Four.on.the.floor
Four.on.the.floor is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


so I thought by memory it was blue so I ran out there and snapped a photo. is this what your talking about ?

so from what you just said. I will not have to replace the computer but just a new matching dizzy.
 
  #9  
Old 07-09-2015, 09:29 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Yes, that is what I was talking about. But, if that worked with your dizzy then you have a matched set. However, since the deck height on a 351W is higher than that of a 302 you may need a dizzy for a 351W - I just don't know that about the Windsor engines.
 
  #10  
Old 07-09-2015, 09:31 AM
Four.on.the.floor's Avatar
Four.on.the.floor
Four.on.the.floor is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well I want to go with a roller so a new steel geared dizzy was already on the list.
 
  #11  
Old 07-09-2015, 09:35 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Good point. And good plan. By the way, that DS-II box doesn't use a computer. So, if there's one under the driver's seat it isn't being used and can be removed.
 
  #12  
Old 07-09-2015, 09:48 AM
Four.on.the.floor's Avatar
Four.on.the.floor
Four.on.the.floor is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no it does not. will a 351 just bolt on directly or does it need a different flywheel. just thinking about stuff that i might overlook but it seems like an easy build.

find a 351 strip it down to just the block, put my heads on it ( get them drilled to 1/2")
and an intake then slap on the dizzy and carb and should be good to go.
 
  #13  
Old 07-09-2015, 09:59 AM
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Franklin2 is online now
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 53,581
Likes: 0
Received 1,658 Likes on 1,341 Posts
The 302 engines changed the inbalance of the flywheel after 1982. The 351w stayed the same (28 oz inbalance). So it's hard to say about the flywheels, I would guess you are going to need a new one.

You will need a new y-pipe for the exhaust if that's what you have, and different exhaust manifolds. The 351w is a wider engine, so even though the 302 exhaust will bolt to the heads, it doesn't work out right. If you have a dual system you might be able to make the old 302 system work.

When you find your 351w, I would go ahead and tear down the front and put a new timing chain and gears on it, and take the pan off and clean it out. If you get a 351 from a car you will need to get a rear sump pan and oil pump extension anyway.
 
  #14  
Old 07-09-2015, 10:24 AM
Four.on.the.floor's Avatar
Four.on.the.floor
Four.on.the.floor is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what is the oil pump extension for ?
 
  #15  
Old 07-09-2015, 12:27 PM
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Franklin2 is online now
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 53,581
Likes: 0
Received 1,658 Likes on 1,341 Posts
Originally Posted by Four.on.the.floor
what is the oil pump extension for ?
Ford engines are normally front sump. That's because the distributor is in the front, and it drives the oil pump which is in front. So the low part of the pan is in front. That won't work in these trucks, the crossmember is in the way. So they had to move the low part of the pan(the sump) to the rear. When they did that, they had to put a long pipe on the oil pump to go down to the rear to suck the oil up, that's the extension. There is also a special main bolt with a stud sticking out that supports this long pipe. You need that too. Any engine out of a truck or Bronco will already have this setup. I put a 351w in from a 79 Cougar, so I had to round up this stuff to make it work on my 1980 f150.

When converting a fuel injected engine you also need to check the eccentric that holds the large camshaft gear on. On the fuel injected engines this eccentric is there, but it's just one piece and they use it like a large washer. On the engines with a mechanical fuel pump, they had a two piece eccentric that would not wear out as quick. I would take the one off the 302 and put it on the fuel injected engine to reduce the wear on the fuel pump arm. Of course you will also probably swap timing covers so you can mount the fuel pump, unless you are going to use a electric pump.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 302 vs 351



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.