2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts

2015 F150 3.5l ecoboost Bad fuel mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 04-30-2015, 07:08 PM
NASSTY's Avatar
NASSTY
NASSTY is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ME
Posts: 2,474
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Until Ford gets an 8 or a 10 speed transmission they will be chasing Ram in MPGs. But when they do they should be ahead of Ram. The Hemi was always known as a gas hog, before it had an 8 speed transmission behind it.
 
  #47  
Old 04-30-2015, 10:34 PM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by NASSTY
Until Ford gets an 8 or a 10 speed transmission they will be chasing Ram in MPGs. But when they do they should be ahead of Ram. The Hemi was always known as a gas hog, before it had an 8 speed transmission behind it.
Not really true. I had a 300C in 2005 with the Hemi and a 5 speed. I turned in many a true 25 MPG tank, many back-to-back running the interstate at every bit of the speed limit and then some. And back then to get a true 25, as measured via keeping track of every drop of fuel that went in, was very good.
 
  #48  
Old 04-30-2015, 11:18 PM
VegasF150's Avatar
VegasF150
VegasF150 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
Not really true. I had a 300C in 2005 with the Hemi and a 5 speed. I turned in many a true 25 MPG tank, many back-to-back running the interstate at every bit of the speed limit and then some. And back then to get a true 25, as measured via keeping track of every drop of fuel that went in, was very good.
I had a hemi back in 2005 in my truck at the time, loved it. Great power and good fuel milage got 16 consistant no matter how agressive I drove it!
 
  #49  
Old 05-01-2015, 12:20 AM
Frdtrkrul's Avatar
Frdtrkrul
Frdtrkrul is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Utica, Nebraska
Posts: 1,244
Received 29 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
Not really true. I had a 300C in 2005 with the Hemi and a 5 speed. I turned in many a true 25 MPG tank, many back-to-back running the interstate at every bit of the speed limit and then some. And back then to get a true 25, as measured via keeping track of every drop of fuel that went in, was very good.
I think he's saying in the Ram 1500 mostly, where 16/17 mpg would be the norm.

Getting back to the poor fuel economy, my first thoughts were poor fuel quality, engine needs to be broken in more or too much ethanol in the fuel. I know around Minnesota they made it mandatory that all gasoline (with the exception of Non-oxygenated) has to have a minimum of 10% Ethanol. Which from some articles I have read boosts a bit more power but is not very fuel efficient. My dad taught me never go to a gas station where the tanker truck is there filling up the storage tanks. He has had bad luck in the past were sediment makes its way to the top of the fuel and mixes around creating some problems with engines. Happened to my grandpa as well.

I wouldn't go by the vehicle computer anyway for mileage. It might be accurate but nothing beats hand calculating anyway.
 
  #50  
Old 05-01-2015, 06:00 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,125
Received 1,218 Likes on 801 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasF150
I had a hemi back in 2005 in my truck at the time, loved it. Great power and good fuel milage got 16 consistant no matter how agressive I drove it!
I just noticed that your truck is a Platinum. Could you please look on your door plate and tell us what your truck weighs?

I don't know of any of the 145" wheel base Platinums in the 2009-2014 vintage that were achieving the EPA estimate 21 Hwy. Your truck is the heaviest of the normal F-150's. It's also important to remember that when the Monroney sticker is printed, it's not geared toward any particular truck. These stickers are generic and printed to capture all 4x4 F-150 MPG estimates except for the Raptor.

Common sense tells us that a RC F-150 4x4 with the ecoboost and 3.31 axles should achieve the 23 MPG's advertised whereas the very heavy Platinum series very possibly may not.

Not trying to make excuses for your situation and I certainly believe that as the engine wears in the MPG's will improve, mine did.
 
  #51  
Old 05-01-2015, 01:38 PM
rmccbride's Avatar
rmccbride
rmccbride is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 474
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by mark waller
I would love to hear what others with a 2015 are getting in fuel mileage. I'm looking at a Lariat 4x4 and was going to the 3.5 engine because I tow but wonder how accurate the 5.0 engine mileage is.
I have the 4X4 Lariat SC with the 5L haven't even got 200 miles on it yet but today took wife shopping all over the place and stopping at garage sales and trip computer showed we got 15mpg. So I'm more than happy with my choice of engine I'm sure it will pull my boat and BobCat trailer as good or better than my old 4.6 did and I was happy with it.
OK I'm a 70 year old fart,, but I don't drive like one!
 
  #52  
Old 05-01-2015, 01:54 PM
VegasF150's Avatar
VegasF150
VegasF150 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Update - as disapointed as I have been I am noticing a difference since my last visit to the dealership where they say they did noting but run test and I'm getting 18 mpg combined from my morning running around. So from 12-13 to now 18 and they did nothing. Well I'm sure happy they did that nothing to it to get this change. My driving style is pretty much the same although I do pay more attention now to not let those turbos ingauge. Is it fixed??? Maybe only more driving and time will tell. One thing that's for certain is if you drive like you're scared of the gas pedal and turbos and you will see better mpg's.



Fixed??? Maybe?
 
  #53  
Old 05-01-2015, 02:28 PM
rmccbride's Avatar
rmccbride
rmccbride is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 474
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Didn't you say they put 52 pounds of air in the tires?
 
  #54  
Old 05-01-2015, 03:25 PM
VegasF150's Avatar
VegasF150
VegasF150 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rmccbride
Didn't you say they put 52 pounds of air in the tires?
I did not put it in myself it mysteriously got added when the dealer did nothing to the truck. But yes it has 52psi in the tires.
 
  #55  
Old 05-01-2015, 03:42 PM
rmccbride's Avatar
rmccbride
rmccbride is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 474
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasF150
I did not put it in myself it mysteriously got added when the dealer did nothing to the truck. But yes it has 52psi in the tires.
Is that what the truck calls for? Or is that the max the tires are rated for?
 
  #56  
Old 05-01-2015, 04:16 PM
VegasF150's Avatar
VegasF150
VegasF150 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rmccbride
Is that what the truck calls for? Or is that the max the tires are rated for?
The tires themselves have a max rating of 52psi.
 
  #57  
Old 05-01-2015, 05:11 PM
rmccbride's Avatar
rmccbride
rmccbride is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 474
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasF150
The tires themselves have a max rating of 52psi.
Mine have a max 51psi for max load. But I don't normally carry close to that. My door sticker calls for 35 all around and I'm running 36 from the factory. I'll most likely bump them up to 38psi. But I'll never go up to 51.
 
  #58  
Old 05-01-2015, 05:56 PM
VegasF150's Avatar
VegasF150
VegasF150 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rmccbride
Mine have a max 51psi for max load. But I don't normally carry close to that. My door sticker calls for 35 all around and I'm running 36 from the factory. I'll most likely bump them up to 38psi. But I'll never go up to 51.
Yeah I'm not to happy running that much air pressure, I know when I got the truck it had 42. You feel every small bump in the road with how they are now.
 
  #59  
Old 05-01-2015, 06:05 PM
rmccbride's Avatar
rmccbride
rmccbride is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 474
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasF150
Yeah I'm not to happy running that much air pressure, I know when I got the truck it had 42. You feel every small bump in the road with how they are now.
I think mind rides hard at 36 52 must be knocking your filling out!

What does the door sticker call for?
 
  #60  
Old 05-01-2015, 08:06 PM
excaliber551's Avatar
excaliber551
excaliber551 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hopefully they get your truck figured out but I doubt it will get close to what you are hoping for. Hand calculate your mileage and I bet it's even worse than you think.

I have friends with the 3.5EB and not one of them comes close to the rated mileage on the window sticker. 14-19 is what they are rated for. Like mentioned earlier the higher mileage rating of 19 is achieved in a test that averages 48 mph.

At 75 mph plus the truck gets closer to 16mpg on the freeway. Ford used the regular cab truck with best gearing possible to make the mileage they post on the sticker. Some claim they get 20+ mpgs at 70+ mph.

The EB has plenty of torque and is super fun to drive but any hill and it's in boost. If it's in boost your mileage will really suffer. Wait until you tow if you think the mileage is bad now.
 


Quick Reply: 2015 F150 3.5l ecoboost Bad fuel mileage



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 AM.