Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

302 mods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-27-2015, 07:49 PM
Brian Fulcher's Avatar
Brian Fulcher
Brian Fulcher is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
302 mods

So, the f250 has already been swapped over to a carb setup. What are some good mods I could do to the 302 to give it a little more power? its higher mileage so I cant do a whole lot. Some things I've been considering was a new intake manifold, and headers back exhaust. I was wondering if the headers/intake for a 302 would fit a 351W, because that's what I have in storage that I plan to put in the truck.


Currently is got a posi rear end, I'm not sure what ratio. Only other mod is that its got a 1406 carb.


This truck was an original 1990 EFI with a 302 rear end. Im looking mostly for low end power I need to be able to tow 5-7k with it.
 
  #2  
Old 04-27-2015, 08:16 PM
1990-f250's Avatar
1990-f250
1990-f250 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Fulcher
So, the f250 has already been swapped over to a carb setup. What are some good mods I could do to the 302 to give it a little more power? its higher mileage so I cant do a whole lot. Some things I've been considering was a new intake manifold, and headers back exhaust. I was wondering if the headers/intake for a 302 would fit a 351W, because that's what I have in storage that I plan to put in the truck.


Currently is got a posi rear end, I'm not sure what ratio. Only other mod is that its got a 1406 carb.


This truck was an original 1990 EFI with a 302 rear end. Im looking mostly for low end power I need to be able to tow 5-7k with it.
Headers yes. Intake, no.
 
  #3  
Old 04-27-2015, 08:19 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 963 Likes on 762 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Fulcher
Im looking mostly for low end power
Ouch.. well you're not going to get a lot of that from a 302, longtube headers and a single 2.5" exhaust will maximize low rpm output but a 351 would still make it look like a 90lb weakling.
 
  #4  
Old 04-27-2015, 08:49 PM
LeoJr's Avatar
LeoJr
LeoJr is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 2,167
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
A 5.0 can feel like it has low end torque in a lighter vehicle like a Fox body or even a F150.

But it will never feel like a 460 or diesel in a heavier vehicle like a F250, much less with the weight you want to move. Get too far behind the power curve on the 5.0 and you won't ever gain any speed.

If it is an auto trans, plan on manually holding it in a gear a little longer than the trans wants to. The jump to the next gear can be too much of a RPM drop to over come with rather little torque, so you will want to over rev in a gear so when the trans shifts the RPMs fall inside of the power band, not below it.

The 5.0 needs to breath, it needs to spin, and it needs to stay cool.

Long tubes? Sure, you have plenty of room.

1.7 ratio rockers are an easy way to bolt on a 'bigger' cam.

Smart attention to the intake tract will help. Don't fall for gimmicky intake spacers etc. A washable oil filter may be an upgrade.

Don't put in either a racing or a hi-flow oil pump. (They are different.)

When you start to drive the truck like the engine needs to be driven, expect the water pump to start leaking. So, you may want to go ahead and order a double roller timing chain, front crankshaft seal and associated gaskets now.
 
  #5  
Old 04-27-2015, 09:09 PM
Brian Fulcher's Avatar
Brian Fulcher
Brian Fulcher is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is there a specific header I would need?


its a 5 speed manual long bed, im thinking I may go with just headers, and then a set of 2 1/4" duals.
 
  #6  
Old 04-27-2015, 09:35 PM
LeoJr's Avatar
LeoJr
LeoJr is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 2,167
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Even shorties into the stock pipes with a gutted catalytic converter will be an improvement. Don't kill your budget chasing long tubes or a 1/4" bigger pipe size.

A larger single pipe is better money spent than duals if it is cheaper. Unless you have two catalytic converters, all 8 cylinders get funneled into the same pipe and one converter anyway. Then they split back into two pipes. Duals are for bragging rights and TV ads.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
77'F-150
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
07-12-2017 08:33 AM
edgewatergetitboy
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
09-15-2008 12:20 AM
DeathRowe
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
5
11-13-2003 09:39 PM
jmp18
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
3
04-03-2003 09:52 AM
BigBrownTruck
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
08-18-1999 05:07 PM



Quick Reply: 302 mods



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 AM.