351 vs 460 fuel and pull ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-04-2015, 07:33 PM
Realslowww's Avatar
Realslowww
Realslowww is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
351 vs 460 fuel and pull ?

How do they compare on fuel and how much can a 351 pull comfortably. Thanks
 
  #2  
Old 04-04-2015, 07:40 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,845
Received 1,584 Likes on 1,292 Posts
In what vehicle, and how is that vehicle equipped?

You can pull more with a 351W in an F250 with 4.10 axles than you can with a 460 in an old LTD and 2.75 gears.....
 
  #3  
Old 04-04-2015, 07:53 PM
Realslowww's Avatar
Realslowww
Realslowww is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I mean compared to one another in same conditions how much more powerful and a pig is a 460.
 
  #4  
Old 04-04-2015, 08:00 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,845
Received 1,584 Likes on 1,292 Posts
HP and torque specs for both over a number of years.

Engine_Specifications

As for fuel, identically equipped, with the same transmissions and axles, I would expect the 460 to use slightly more fuel. However, the extra fuel buys extra power and an easier tow.

If you have a specific vehicle in mind, you may get folks with the same vehicles to give real examples.

You might find that a 351 stuck in a lower gear would give worse fuel economy than the easier running 460 in some vehicles.

ymmv
 
  #5  
Old 04-04-2015, 08:05 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,897
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
The 460 will out pull the 351 all else being equal but so it should be, in this case there is no replacement for displacement. The 460 will get 10-12mpg at best no matter the trans/axle combo or how nice you drive it, while the 351 can do mid to high teens just driving around. What do you want more.
 
  #6  
Old 04-04-2015, 08:05 PM
Realslowww's Avatar
Realslowww
Realslowww is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I just notice they seem to not use the 351 in f 350 or CCabs to much.
 
  #7  
Old 04-04-2015, 08:07 PM
Realslowww's Avatar
Realslowww
Realslowww is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
The 460 will out pull the 351 all else being equal but so it should be, in this case there is no replacement for displacement. The 460 will get 10-12mpg at best no matter the trans/axle combo or how nice you drive it, while the 351 can do mid to high teens just driving around. What do you want more.

So essentially a 351 is fine for a standard F250 pulling 5000 pounds and will be a better economical package for doing that over a 460 mount ?
 
  #8  
Old 04-04-2015, 09:08 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,897
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
If you only towing occasionally but will drive the truck lots get the smaller motor, if you are towing all the time get the larger motor because you won't save any gas towing with the smaller motor and the bigger motor does a better job at it.
 
  #9  
Old 04-04-2015, 09:13 PM
Old93junk's Avatar
Old93junk
Old93junk is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: McKenzie River
Posts: 23,849
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
If you only towing occasionally but will drive the truck lots get the smaller motor, if you are towing all the time get the larger motor because you won't save any gas towing with the smaller motor and the bigger motor does a better job at it.
Here is truth.........The 351W will get WORSE mpgs towing than the 460 will, simply because the 460 is loafing while the 351 is screaming.

Occasional towing 351W...........lots of towing, less "grocery getting" 460.
 
  #10  
Old 04-04-2015, 09:57 PM
Realslowww's Avatar
Realslowww
Realslowww is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Thanks you all, hey OLD 93 junk they were really trashing the 460 for towing on the IDI forum and said it will not pass up a gas pump and anybody who tells you they will pull loaded and get over 8 miles a gallon is basically a liar. Is this true ?
 
  #11  
Old 04-04-2015, 10:02 PM
Old93junk's Avatar
Old93junk
Old93junk is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: McKenzie River
Posts: 23,849
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Realslowww
Thanks you all, hey OLD 93 junk they were really trashing the 460 for towing on the IDI forum and said it will not pass up a gas pump and anybody who tells you they will pull loaded and get over 8 miles a gallon is basically a liar. Is this true ?
Gutless, no turbo, oil burners should talk.....LOL.

460s are brutes for towing, but the one thing they cannot pass is a gas station, expect 8-10 mpg towing a heavy load, 10-12.5 mpg unloaded depending on gearing and driving habits.
 
  #12  
Old 04-04-2015, 11:04 PM
Realslowww's Avatar
Realslowww
Realslowww is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Thanks.mmm
 
  #13  
Old 04-05-2015, 09:42 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,897
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
The old IDI is better compared to a stock 351 because that is the gas motor it resembles most in terms of HP and TQ output. The only redeaming feature of these old diesels is that they get great gas milage towing or empty but you better not be in a hurry. Until you get into a turbo diesel the best towing motor Ford made was the 460.
 
  #14  
Old 04-05-2015, 10:50 AM
Realslowww's Avatar
Realslowww
Realslowww is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
The old IDI is better compared to a stock 351 because that is the gas motor it resembles most in terms of HP and TQ output. The only redeaming feature of these old diesels is that they get great gas milage towing or empty but you better not be in a hurry. Until you get into a turbo diesel the best towing motor Ford made was the 460.

I have a turbo IDI F 350 and I now realize the old school updated Cummins or IDI Navistar are truly the best thing going for what I want. The newer electronic stuff is good but pricey and you cannot run waste oil through them as easily.


Conanski I am looking for a old school 1 ton or 3/4 ton keeper and do not mind building one but need to start with a low mileage chasses. What would you look for.


I do not care what brand either, a guy here in town took a F350 and put a Cummins mechanical injector pump motor in it run on waste oil with 5 speed and he claims it is by far his best build.


Happy Easter and thanks for the help, I was stupid and just missed a F250 with low miles and that was dumb!!!!! decided to wait till morning and it was gone in 3 hours.
 
  #15  
Old 04-05-2015, 04:36 PM
CTC01's Avatar
CTC01
CTC01 is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: IN
Posts: 154
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
they were really trashing the 460 for towing on the IDI forum and said it will not pass up a gas pump and anybody who tells you they will pull loaded and get over 8 miles a gallon is basically a liar. Is this true ?
First off, I will admit I only get 8 mpg running empty and driving REAL easy.

But there is not a non turbo IDI alive that my 460 wont show tail lights to whether its empty or 10k lb on behind.

Todd
 


Quick Reply: 351 vs 460 fuel and pull ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.