1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

Explorer 8.8 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-29-2015, 08:56 PM
projectPONY's Avatar
projectPONY
projectPONY is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Explorer 8.8 question

Wondering if anyone here is actually running the Explorer 8.8 in their bump. I'd like to know exactly how much narrower it is compared to a 9" in our trucks and any other pro's and con's.

TIA
 
  #2  
Old 03-29-2015, 09:05 PM
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
HIO Silver is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 20,676
Received 58 Likes on 48 Posts
Pros:
  • 3.27 or 3.55 gears. Sometimes with Trac-Lok
  • They're cheap cuz there are millions of them on the road. Lots in the JY.

Cons:
  • Incompatible wheel lug pattern (unless going IFS or CV swap).
  • Not a bolt-on. gotta relocate leaf spring pads
  • Integral carrier.. requires gear set-up inside the axle.. either up in the air or on your back..... I can change the rear gear carrier of a 9-inch gear in about 30 minutes... alone. Try that with an 8.8!
  • Not as good aftermarket support than the ubiquitous 9-inch.

Please drive through....
 
  #3  
Old 03-29-2015, 09:28 PM
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
ultraranger is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Camden, Arkansas
Posts: 6,398
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
I don't have an Explorer rear end under my '69 F100 but, I do have a '96 Explorer rear end sitting in my shop.

Explorer 8.8" rear ends from 1995-2001 had solid axle housings, 31-spline axles and disc brakes as standard equipment.

Explorer rear ends prior to 1995 had drum brakes. Explorers after 2001 were IRS.

Some ratios were 3.08 and 3.27. More common ratios in the '95-2001 models were 3.55, 3.73 and 4.10:1. Some but not all had Traction-Lok differentials. --the '96 Explorer rear end I have has 3.55:1 gears but doesn't have a Traction-Lok differential although, adding a Traction-Lok wouldn't be too difficult.

Explorer rear end ratio codes.

Ford 7.5 & 8.8 Inch Axle Tag & Door Codes
 
  #4  
Old 03-29-2015, 09:38 PM
projectPONY's Avatar
projectPONY
projectPONY is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HIO Silver
Pros:
  • 3.27 or 3.55 gears. Sometimes with Trac-Lok
  • They're cheap cuz there are millions of them on the road. Lots in the JY.

Cons:
  • Incompatible wheel lug pattern (unless going IFS or CV swap).
  • Not a bolt-on. gotta relocate leaf spring pads
  • Integral carrier.. requires gear set-up inside the axle.. either up in the air or on your back..... I can change the rear gear carrier of a 9-inch gear in about 30 minutes... alone. Try that with an 8.8!
  • Not as good aftermarket support than the ubiquitous 9-inch.

Please drive through....

Hmm, I will most likely go the CV route.
The 8.8 is a tri-angulated 4 bar. Spring perches go away.
This will be a street truck so once gears are selected, they are there to stay.
I'm a mustang guy, and this rearend is very well supported aftermarket wise.
 
  #5  
Old 03-29-2015, 09:48 PM
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
HIO Silver is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 20,676
Received 58 Likes on 48 Posts
Ah I see... you're gonna turn an F100 into a big Mustang pickup.
 
  #6  
Old 03-29-2015, 09:52 PM
projectPONY's Avatar
projectPONY
projectPONY is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes. Not into mudding.
 
  #7  
Old 03-30-2015, 07:45 PM
Bigfreeb's Avatar
Bigfreeb
Bigfreeb is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Silverdale, Wa.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I memory serves me correct the Exploder rear diff is off center to accommodate the drive shaft coming from the transfer case. And the 3:73 traction loc is pretty common I found one at pick n pull $159 plus tax and small core charge. I'm going with the wider 98-02 Crown vic in my 68 build.
 
  #8  
Old 03-30-2015, 08:08 PM
projectPONY's Avatar
projectPONY
projectPONY is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What kind of repercussions should someone expect from the rear track width being narrower than the front?
 
  #9  
Old 03-30-2015, 08:09 PM
projectPONY's Avatar
projectPONY
projectPONY is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...also, I would still like to know how much narrower the 8.8 is compared to a 9".
 
  #10  
Old 03-30-2015, 08:48 PM
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
HIO Silver is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 20,676
Received 58 Likes on 48 Posts
Which 9? They came in different widths. Or do you mean the 9 that came in these trucks?
 
  #11  
Old 03-30-2015, 09:03 PM
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
ultraranger is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Camden, Arkansas
Posts: 6,398
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
To get a 9-inch rear end that's the correct width to match the track width of a CV front suspension, you need to locate an '80-'83 Ford F100 with the 5-on-4.5" lug pattern.

You'll have to move the leaf spring perches but, the rear end is the right (wider) width and has the same lug pattern spacing as the lug spacing on the CV front rotors. It will also have 31-spline axles. --plus, it's a Ford 9-inch.

I don't know for sure but there's a good chance the CV 8.8" MAY have 28-spline axles.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johnson.jeff.a
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
58
11-08-2018 08:26 PM
Pearlwhite94
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
01-09-2015 03:53 PM
MNbandit
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
08-10-2010 12:12 AM
frank5
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
3
01-13-2007 11:54 AM
al37ford
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
09-11-2006 06:54 PM



Quick Reply: Explorer 8.8 question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.