Explorer 8.8 question
#1
#2
Pros:
Cons:
Please drive through....
- 3.27 or 3.55 gears. Sometimes with Trac-Lok
- They're cheap cuz there are millions of them on the road. Lots in the JY.
Cons:
- Incompatible wheel lug pattern (unless going IFS or CV swap).
- Not a bolt-on. gotta relocate leaf spring pads
- Integral carrier.. requires gear set-up inside the axle.. either up in the air or on your back..... I can change the rear gear carrier of a 9-inch gear in about 30 minutes... alone. Try that with an 8.8!
- Not as good aftermarket support than the ubiquitous 9-inch.
Please drive through....
#3
I don't have an Explorer rear end under my '69 F100 but, I do have a '96 Explorer rear end sitting in my shop.
Explorer 8.8" rear ends from 1995-2001 had solid axle housings, 31-spline axles and disc brakes as standard equipment.
Explorer rear ends prior to 1995 had drum brakes. Explorers after 2001 were IRS.
Some ratios were 3.08 and 3.27. More common ratios in the '95-2001 models were 3.55, 3.73 and 4.10:1. Some but not all had Traction-Lok differentials. --the '96 Explorer rear end I have has 3.55:1 gears but doesn't have a Traction-Lok differential although, adding a Traction-Lok wouldn't be too difficult.
Explorer rear end ratio codes.
Ford 7.5 & 8.8 Inch Axle Tag & Door Codes
Explorer 8.8" rear ends from 1995-2001 had solid axle housings, 31-spline axles and disc brakes as standard equipment.
Explorer rear ends prior to 1995 had drum brakes. Explorers after 2001 were IRS.
Some ratios were 3.08 and 3.27. More common ratios in the '95-2001 models were 3.55, 3.73 and 4.10:1. Some but not all had Traction-Lok differentials. --the '96 Explorer rear end I have has 3.55:1 gears but doesn't have a Traction-Lok differential although, adding a Traction-Lok wouldn't be too difficult.
Explorer rear end ratio codes.
Ford 7.5 & 8.8 Inch Axle Tag & Door Codes
#4
Pros:
Cons:
Please drive through....
- 3.27 or 3.55 gears. Sometimes with Trac-Lok
- They're cheap cuz there are millions of them on the road. Lots in the JY.
Cons:
- Incompatible wheel lug pattern (unless going IFS or CV swap).
- Not a bolt-on. gotta relocate leaf spring pads
- Integral carrier.. requires gear set-up inside the axle.. either up in the air or on your back..... I can change the rear gear carrier of a 9-inch gear in about 30 minutes... alone. Try that with an 8.8!
- Not as good aftermarket support than the ubiquitous 9-inch.
Please drive through....
Hmm, I will most likely go the CV route.
The 8.8 is a tri-angulated 4 bar. Spring perches go away.
This will be a street truck so once gears are selected, they are there to stay.
I'm a mustang guy, and this rearend is very well supported aftermarket wise.
#7
I memory serves me correct the Exploder rear diff is off center to accommodate the drive shaft coming from the transfer case. And the 3:73 traction loc is pretty common I found one at pick n pull $159 plus tax and small core charge. I'm going with the wider 98-02 Crown vic in my 68 build.
Trending Topics
#11
To get a 9-inch rear end that's the correct width to match the track width of a CV front suspension, you need to locate an '80-'83 Ford F100 with the 5-on-4.5" lug pattern.
You'll have to move the leaf spring perches but, the rear end is the right (wider) width and has the same lug pattern spacing as the lug spacing on the CV front rotors. It will also have 31-spline axles. --plus, it's a Ford 9-inch.
I don't know for sure but there's a good chance the CV 8.8" MAY have 28-spline axles.
You'll have to move the leaf spring perches but, the rear end is the right (wider) width and has the same lug pattern spacing as the lug spacing on the CV front rotors. It will also have 31-spline axles. --plus, it's a Ford 9-inch.
I don't know for sure but there's a good chance the CV 8.8" MAY have 28-spline axles.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johnson.jeff.a
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
58
11-08-2018 08:26 PM
Pearlwhite94
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
01-09-2015 03:53 PM