MPG built 5.8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 03-02-2015, 08:13 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,917
Likes: 0
Received 960 Likes on 760 Posts
Originally Posted by hustler54
The only problem I haven't figured out is the 5.8 has dual intake hoses from the throttle body to the breather box and the 5.0 is a single with the mass sensor. How do most folk go about getting the 5.8 to work with the mass sensor? Do they just swap 5.0 upper or install a cold air intake for the 5.8 with the mass sensor inline?
You're not seeing the forest for the trees. In other works you're too close and not seeing the bigger picture, both of the these motors use an upper intake with the exact same dual throttlebody.
 
  #17  
Old 03-02-2015, 09:04 PM
hustler54's Avatar
hustler54
hustler54 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for not flaming me for a stupid question, the engine is under a tarp and I was thinking the 5.0 was a single bore throttle body. A thousand pardons, I apologize for my insolence. Sounds pretty simple now, thanks for setting me straight conanski!
 
  #18  
Old 03-03-2015, 03:31 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,917
Likes: 0
Received 960 Likes on 760 Posts
Originally Posted by hustler54
I was mistaken, the truck has a 4r70w transmission. Hopefully these are pretty good transmissions, don't know anything about these.
The 4R70w is a good trans, it's not rated as high as the E4OD but it seems to be less problematic and it's cheaper to build/rebuild. Also note you cannot use the E4OD flexplate(wrong offset) on this trans, and the 5.0 version won't work either(wrong imbalance), you need a new 5.8(28oz) AOD/4R70w flexplate.

And about the throttlebodys.. if the 5.0 was from a car it would have a single TB.
 
  #19  
Old 03-08-2015, 09:10 PM
hustler54's Avatar
hustler54
hustler54 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well here she be, my new F150



But here is what the pan and transmission, yikes!





Think this transmission can be salvaged?
 
  #20  
Old 03-09-2015, 10:25 AM
351Cleveland C4's Avatar
351Cleveland C4
351Cleveland C4 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the Edge of the Desert
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes on 120 Posts
I've seen worse. I would Just clean it the best I could and then run it and flush it out. Maybe a couple times.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jimbo beam
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
11-16-2014 11:07 AM
special_k
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
3
01-20-2010 10:38 AM
73azbronco
1966 - 1977 Early Broncos
6
11-14-2007 11:38 AM
Diggie
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
17
08-30-2004 10:17 AM
vatainc
Performance & General Engine Building
13
06-16-2002 09:21 PM



Quick Reply: MPG built 5.8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.