My 400 EFI Project

  #1  
Old 02-10-2015, 09:02 PM
smandzak's Avatar
smandzak
smandzak is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
My 400 EFI Project

This winter's project was to join the 400 EFI club, so thought I would share some of the details. Maybe it will give somebody an idea.

Basic concept of the setup:
- Megasquirt MS3-Pro
- Edelbrock 2171 intake w/ injector bungs added
- Edelbrock 4 barrel throttle body w/ PWM IAC
- 5.0L Explorer fuel rail & 6.2L injectors (33 lb)
- 7.5L TFI distributor (remote style)
- 7.5L Mass Air Filter
- 80mm Lightning MAF
- 1985 7.5L tank fuel pump senders
- LC-1 wideband & other standard Ford sensors


Intake up first:

Using a new intake I made a rig to hold the intake in a fixed position so I could drill the intake bung holes with a drill press. Ford seems to have tilted the injectors over 22.5 degrees side to side on 5.0L's but that wouldn't have left enough room at the center for the throttle body. So I compromised with a 15 degree angle to have the best compromise of angling towards the back of the intake valve while keeping enough room for the throttle body. The drill press table was then angled 15 degrees to match the angle that Ford used for the injector front to back tilt. I was able to find a good distance away from the flange that let me keep the vacuum ports (not too far inboard) and entering the port right at the top (not too far outboard).



With a fence on the table I was able to drill a hole, slide the intake to the next runner and drill the next. I had to go slow and it vibrated a bit more than I would have liked but it got done pretty quickly.



The holes turned out accurate enough but the bungs needed to be held in place due to them sliding too deep or not quite keeping in line. It was also a balance of the lower runners having the bung not too high and higher runners not too low. To make sure the welding shop didn't have to think about it I made up a way too complicated rig to hold them in line. The square tube was drilled with the same angle so it forced everything to the right spacing. Chunks of copper tubing were cut to set the depth, and then the nuts just kept things snug. (BTW they were parallel but the camera made them look not)



I don't have a TIG so a local shop welded it up for a surprisingly low price. All I had to do after they were done was knock down the extra bung material in the runners with a carbide bit.



I liked the 5.0L Explorer fuel rail setup so I had picked up a junkyard set. I changed the cross over tubing (with Aeroquip 4AN socketless) to compensate for the extra intake width.



Couldn't help mocking it up. I can even sneak the cruise control through it all.




Air intake:

I knew I wanted to run MAF so one day I wandered a junk yard for a couple hours and grabbed a few air filter assemblies that I thought may work. In the end one from a 96 F350 MAF 7.5L worked the best. It was narrow enough to sit between the battery and radiator with a simple bracket and had the same MAF bolt pattern as a Lightning. On from there was a duct and a TBI hat from a Dodge.




Wiring:

From the Diyautotune kit I received 8' of unterminated harness and so I went about adding in power wires, grounds, connectors, etc. Fuel injector subharnesses were made (not pictured so it looks a little too simple). There are many wires that I don't need so they were terminated at Delphi GT150 connectors so I can easily plug something into it in the future.



BTW even though its a TFI distributor I never used the actual TFI module. The ECU picks up the signal directly from the distributor sensor and then commands the MSD when to fire.

I mounted the ECU where the duraspark used to be and from there the harness runs across the top of the firewall and then down along the passenger side of the intake. A power wire from the battery gets everything power, and the vehicle duraspark connector triggers the relay with key on.




Fuel supply:

I figured out that fuel senders from a 1984-85 F350 7.5L were a great match as they had:
- same small fuel tank mounting hole size
- low pressure pump
- return line
- fuel level sender with the same resistance sweep

The rear sender was a direct swap other than the extra harness pin to power the pump. (Airtex E2089S)



The center tank was slightly more work but not too much. The flange hole on a 79 F150 is more on the side of the tank than an 85, so right above the sender card I bent the tubes to match my original. (Airtex E2091S) The filter sock now sits on the bottom of the tank and the float sits at the right spot for empty & full. (Before & after)





The in tank pumps only provide low pressure, so they connect to a switching valve and then on to a frame rail mounted high pressure pump (front tank not yet reinstalled).



The factory fuel line was used as the return and I ran a new supply line using socketless hose (6AN). Unfortunately the only fuel rail spring lock connectors I could find with a 3/8 barb & through hole was AN type so had to go that way but it looks nice (and expensive ). Other joints are all plastic quick connect type.




After final assembly we got it running without too much difficulty. I had a few settings wrong that took a little time to figure out but now its driveable and the tuning is ongoing. The only things left are to loom some of the remaining wiring, connect the kickdown lever, and see if I can get a progressive throttle pulley to make it less sensitive (hitting bumps demonstrates throttle response quite well and my inability to hold my foot still enough).

I'm still amazed how it can happily idle at 15:1 AFR and rev like a modern engine.

 

Last edited by smandzak; 02-11-2015 at 08:45 PM. Reason: try to get pictures to work for everyone
  #2  
Old 02-11-2015, 07:24 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
That's a great story, but I really wish I could see the pictures. Anyone else have that problem?

Anyway, it idles at 15:1, but where does it run on the road? And the throttle response is quick, but what about power?
 
  #3  
Old 02-11-2015, 11:47 AM
f100beatertruck's Avatar
f100beatertruck
f100beatertruck is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Parkesburg PA
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have that problem too.

Are you running MAF with MS3?
 
  #4  
Old 02-11-2015, 04:19 PM
daves77crew's Avatar
daves77crew
daves77crew is offline
Cross-Country
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a great setup, This is what I would like to do to my truck.
How are you able to tune this setup?
 
  #5  
Old 02-11-2015, 09:09 PM
smandzak's Avatar
smandzak
smandzak is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Well that was unexpected, pictures would work fine in Chrome & Firefox but not IE apparently. I switched them over from hosting on Google Drive to directly on the forum, so hopefully they work now for everyone.

To answer the questions so far:

AFR tries to achieve whatever I command via a table, generally running down the road is around 14.7:1 and near WOT it will target around 13:1.



Power is quite good, haven't been able to test WOT much in this weather, but I am certainly not down any power from before. And its also more usable since there is no awkward transitions to secondaries.

Yes, the MAF is the primary input with this setup on the MS3. I have a MAP connected, but at the moment its just along for the ride and not used in any calculations.

Tuning is done with Tunerstudio software. I have a USB port mounted to the firewall that I connect up to with my laptop. So generally I have the laptop on the passenger seat logging data to look at later (target AFR vs what actually happened) but I can also tweak things when stopped at a light. Definitely will take some effort to make it perfect and not stumble anywhere, but should just require seat time and careful changes.


 
  #6  
Old 02-11-2015, 09:54 PM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Thanks for fixing the pics, but I'm using Chrome on this Windows machine and Safari on the iPad and they didn't work on either.

Anyway, looks good!
 
  #7  
Old 02-21-2015, 11:43 AM
wyoming4x4's Avatar
wyoming4x4
wyoming4x4 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: wyoming
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Very cool! Nice setup!
 
  #8  
Old 02-22-2015, 07:39 AM
derbydad276's Avatar
derbydad276
derbydad276 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: canton michigan
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool ... what did it cost you? compared to a a F.A.S.T or a MSD EZ EFI?
 
  #9  
Old 02-22-2015, 08:39 PM
smandzak's Avatar
smandzak
smandzak is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Ugh, I was avoiding adding it all up, but I just did for what would be required to replicate this with the basic components and it would be about $2600.

That includes the LC-1 and all the other hardware (but left the MSD 6AL out). Big unavoidable costs for me were the MS3 Pro kit ($1200) and throttle body ($480). Grabbing the junkyard parts kept the costs down pretty good on things that don't go bad. I have a few extra things that aren't necessary (fuel & oil pressure transducers, etc), but they only added about $200.

Overall pretty similar to a basic aftermarket TBI based kits and much cheaper than the multiport setups.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AbandonedBronco
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
153
12-18-2023 03:41 PM
petrokiller
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
17
09-16-2015 04:40 PM
Holehawgg
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
71
03-03-2015 09:08 AM
landmobile
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
2
04-18-2012 01:45 PM
gt40racing
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
04-17-2012 11:11 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: My 400 EFI Project



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 PM.