Why not ecoboost in a Superduty?
#17
#18
#19
#20
#21
There are a couple Ford Techs who have their own YouTube channels that have posted some interesting gotchas related to the DI-turbo Ecoboost engines they're seeing. One symptom I find intriguing, is one or more dropped cylinders at less than 50K miles. Apparently the cause is carbon buildup on valves, in particular the valves where the PCV fumes are fed back into the engine. As typical, turbocharged engines where cylinder pressures are high under boost, produce quite a bit of crankcase blow-by. The fumes fed behind the valves produce excessive carbon, causing the valves to be stuck partially open. One of the techs brought this anomaly to Ford engineers who really didn't have an answer, other than pull the heads. Last I saw, Ford was working on a chemical cleaning method for the problem. Another thing one tech mentioned, was independent shops trying to clean the carbon build up on DI-turbo engines by using Seafoam or other chemical cleaners down the air intake. Ford discourages this method because it can destroy the turbocharger. The extra combustion occurring in the turbo has been causing seal failures.
As my father used to say, and is true with the EcoBoost engines; you don't get something for nothing. Smaller, more complicated engines that work harder, will probably require more expensive maintenance and live a shorter life.
As my father used to say, and is true with the EcoBoost engines; you don't get something for nothing. Smaller, more complicated engines that work harder, will probably require more expensive maintenance and live a shorter life.
#22
We were looking at buying a new truck a while back (but the $47k sticker shock nixed that idea), and the salesman was reeeeeally pushing the eco. I think the 5.0 is a better engine, so he let us test drive both. I liked the 5.0 better out of the two. No lag, better performance, and way better sound. I did like the eco, power wise, and think its a good marketing ploy, but I don't believe the mileage numbers, which is their biggest supposed perk. From what I've been garhering out here in the 'real' world, they're not getting any kind of mileage like what they advertise, which isn't really much of a surprise I guess. Plus, like I told the salesmen...Those turbo's are $3,500 A PIECE, and the warranty doesn't last forever!
Frank
Frank
#23
That's wrong Frank, the EB turbos can be had for around $600 each from Tousley Ford.
People constantly resist change, I remember similar things were said about aluminum heads on a diesel engine. And after more than ten years you very rarely hear of a problem with them. Likewise there are many DI turbocharged gas engines with lots of hard miles that are going just fine.
People constantly resist change, I remember similar things were said about aluminum heads on a diesel engine. And after more than ten years you very rarely hear of a problem with them. Likewise there are many DI turbocharged gas engines with lots of hard miles that are going just fine.
#24
I'm working on doing exactly that. Propane injection and electric accessory drive. I won't post a thread about it until it's done though because I know it will make most people here's brain explode.
#25
#26
We were looking at buying a new truck a while back (but the $47k sticker shock nixed that idea), and the salesman was reeeeeally pushing the eco. I think the 5.0 is a better engine, so he let us test drive both. I liked the 5.0 better out of the two. No lag, better performance, and way better sound. I did like the eco, power wise, and think its a good marketing ploy, but I don't believe the mileage numbers, which is their biggest supposed perk. From what I've been garhering out here in the 'real' world, they're not getting any kind of mileage like what they advertise, which isn't really much of a surprise I guess. Plus, like I told the salesmen...Those turbo's are $3,500 A PIECE, and the warranty doesn't last forever!
Frank
Frank
Frank
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post