6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Removed stock 6.0 transmission pan/installed 2008 6.4 trans pan & FT-180 filter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 01-27-2015, 12:12 AM
04badford's Avatar
04badford
04badford is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Manteca,Ca
Posts: 7,478
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thanks for the Part Numbers and Vid I bet you were needen a smoke around 5:16 in the video Huh
 
  #17  
Old 01-27-2015, 04:23 AM
KDAVID1's Avatar
KDAVID1
KDAVID1 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: TX
Posts: 4,073
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Misky6.0
What Dan said about "blig" (imo) appies to the other pans, NOT the Ford '08+ pan w/filter. The internal filter is the HUGE advantage, this required a deeper pan, which increased the fluid. This '08+ pan does NOT claim extra cooling, it is what Ford felt would IMPROVE the transmission, which says a lot to me.
Do you still run the toilet paper as well?

2006 F350 4X4
 
  #18  
Old 01-27-2015, 11:06 AM
diesel_dan's Avatar
diesel_dan
diesel_dan is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Foothills, CA
Posts: 6,828
Received 409 Likes on 271 Posts
I put one back in when I did my swap -- only because I had bought a couple b4 deciding to do the upgrade. Mark K. says it is optional as the internal filter does such a good job. So when I run out of TP filters I'll leave the canister empty.

I don't know if I have this right: IIRC the earliest '08s had the external filter moved to right near the trans and "might" have also had the new internal one too. But the external one quickly went away and all the newer trans have only the internal...
 
  #19  
Old 01-27-2015, 11:32 AM
Money-Pit's Avatar
Money-Pit
Money-Pit is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 2,169
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by chaser1602
What is the cost of that 08 pan and filter?
I updated the original post with current prices from Autonation Whitebearlake Ford. You can get the filter cheaper elsewhere.
 
  #20  
Old 01-27-2015, 12:02 PM
KDAVID1's Avatar
KDAVID1
KDAVID1 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: TX
Posts: 4,073
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by diesel_dan
I put one back in when I did my swap -- only because I had bought a couple b4 deciding to do the upgrade. Mark K. says it is optional as the internal filter does such a good job. So when I run out of TP filters I'll leave the canister empty.

I don't know if I have this right: IIRC the earliest '08s had the external filter moved to right near the trans and "might" have also had the new internal one too. But the external one quickly went away and all the newer trans have only the internal...
TKS--good to know.
 
  #21  
Old 01-27-2015, 12:11 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Mark Kovalsky is online now
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 23,241
Received 1,571 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Originally Posted by diesel_dan
I put one back in when I did my swap -- only because I had bought a couple b4 deciding to do the upgrade. Mark K. says it is optional as the internal filter does such a good job. So when I run out of TP filters I'll leave the canister empty.
The newer internal filter is slightly better than the external filter. I forget the micron ratings, it's been too long. The external filter only sees 10% of what's going through the coolers, and when the trans is below about 165F the flow to the coolers is cut by 90%. So once you have the newer internal filter there isn't a need for the external filter.

Originally Posted by diesel_dan
I don't know if I have this right: IIRC the earliest '08s had the external filter moved to right near the trans and "might" have also had the new internal one too. But the external one quickly went away and all the newer trans have only the internal...
The external filter went away the at the same time the internal filter was upgraded. It was an either/or, they never ran both.
 
  #22  
Old 01-27-2015, 01:30 PM
HT32BSX115's Avatar
HT32BSX115
HT32BSX115 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upper Left Coast
Posts: 3,918
Likes: 0
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
The newer internal filter is slightly better than the external filter. I forget the micron ratings, it's been too long. The external filter only sees 10% of what's going through the coolers, and when the trans is below about 165F the flow to the coolers is cut by 90%. So once you have the newer internal filter there isn't a need for the external filter.


The external filter went away the at the same time the internal filter was upgraded. It was an either/or, they never ran both.
That might bring questions about the E4OD as well I would think.

The Derale pan appears to hold more fluid over the OEM pans..........
Derale Performance Transmission Pan

Fits E4OD, 4R100, 5R110 & 5R110W

P/N - 14208

Increases fluid capacity 7 quarts 10 ounces
Lowers Transmission Fluid Temperatures
Includes Gasket & Drain Plug
Would it also be possible to use the FT-180 filter in an E4OD to preclude using an external filter too?
 
  #23  
Old 01-27-2015, 02:55 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Mark Kovalsky is online now
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 23,241
Received 1,571 Likes on 1,049 Posts
The Derale pan does hold more fluid. The thing I don't understand is why you would want more fluid. I don't see any benefit. And I flat out don't believe the pan will lower fluid temperatures.
 
  #24  
Old 01-27-2015, 04:36 PM
BPofMD's Avatar
BPofMD
BPofMD is offline
FTE Legend

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Millersville, MD
Posts: 65,314
Received 1,081 Likes on 983 Posts
If he installs the 6.0 trans cooler in at the same time it might!!! Yes, I am joking around. But it IS much better than the one in the 7.3's.
 
  #25  
Old 01-28-2015, 08:41 PM
LindenBruce's Avatar
LindenBruce
LindenBruce is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Linden, Ca.
Posts: 972
Received 224 Likes on 148 Posts
Ok but excuse my ignorance. Why are we changing a perfectly good oil pan? Does my 06' F250 have an internal transmission filter? I just thought there was just the one on the frame? Bruce
 
  #26  
Old 01-28-2015, 08:54 PM
Misky6.0's Avatar
Misky6.0
Misky6.0 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ouray, CO
Posts: 5,419
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by LindenBruce
Ok but excuse my ignorance. Why are we changing a perfectly good TRANS pan? Does my 06' F250 have an internal transmission filter? I just thought there was just the one on the frame? Bruce

I fixed the typo..
Short answers.. the 08 internal filter filters all the trans fluid. The 'toilet paper' external filter only gets a small % of the fluid.
Ford decided to upgrade to the internal filters in '08 - THAT should say something..
This will provide all the reasons..

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ns-filter.html
 
  #27  
Old 01-28-2015, 10:13 PM
diesel_dan's Avatar
diesel_dan
diesel_dan is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Foothills, CA
Posts: 6,828
Received 409 Likes on 271 Posts
Originally Posted by Misky6.0
I fixed the typo..
Short answers.. the 08 internal filter filters all the trans fluid. The 'toilet paper' external filter only gets a small % of the oil.
Ford decided to upgrade to the internal filters in '08 - THAT should say something..
This will provide all the reasons..

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ns-filter.html
Yes and in that thread, skip pages 3 - 6 as it gets ugly for no real good reason -- the pertinent info starts again on page 7...
 
  #28  
Old 01-29-2015, 12:12 PM
HT32BSX115's Avatar
HT32BSX115
HT32BSX115 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upper Left Coast
Posts: 3,918
Likes: 0
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
The Derale pan does hold more fluid. The thing I don't understand is why you would want more fluid. I don't see any benefit. And I flat out don't believe the pan will lower fluid temperatures.
There is some benefit in having a "lot" of fluid in that the more mass you have to heat, (and cool) the smaller and slower the temp excursions will be.

The downside is too much fluid would take longer (or too long for normal driving) to heat to normal/optimum operating temp.

The pan *could* be a heat exchanger in and of itself, but I think it would either need more "tubes" and forced air through them, and/or cooling fins on the bottom.

It would be easy to calculate the area and size of the fins needed to be effective, but it's unlikely the area of the bottom of the pan is large enough to be a "stand alone" heat exchanger.

And it's hanging down in an area where it could get "whacked"! Not a really good place to place a heat exchanger for a critical component.....




Regards,


Rick
 
  #29  
Old 01-29-2015, 08:56 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Mark Kovalsky is online now
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 23,241
Received 1,571 Likes on 1,049 Posts
And has anyone considered that the air around the trans pan is HOT? You can't cool the trans with hot air, cooling fins tubes or not.
 
  #30  
Old 01-29-2015, 10:38 PM
Rellick's Avatar
Rellick
Rellick is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: KFalls, OR
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
And has anyone considered that the air around the trans pan is HOT? You can't cool the trans with hot air, cooling fins tubes or not.
Wouldn't either one work like a radiator? Where the air hitting it is usually fresh.
 


Quick Reply: Removed stock 6.0 transmission pan/installed 2008 6.4 trans pan & FT-180 filter



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.