Removed stock 6.0 transmission pan/installed 2008 6.4 trans pan & FT-180 filter
#17
What Dan said about "blig" (imo) appies to the other pans, NOT the Ford '08+ pan w/filter. The internal filter is the HUGE advantage, this required a deeper pan, which increased the fluid. This '08+ pan does NOT claim extra cooling, it is what Ford felt would IMPROVE the transmission, which says a lot to me.
2006 F350 4X4
#18
I put one back in when I did my swap -- only because I had bought a couple b4 deciding to do the upgrade. Mark K. says it is optional as the internal filter does such a good job. So when I run out of TP filters I'll leave the canister empty.
I don't know if I have this right: IIRC the earliest '08s had the external filter moved to right near the trans and "might" have also had the new internal one too. But the external one quickly went away and all the newer trans have only the internal...
I don't know if I have this right: IIRC the earliest '08s had the external filter moved to right near the trans and "might" have also had the new internal one too. But the external one quickly went away and all the newer trans have only the internal...
#19
#20
I put one back in when I did my swap -- only because I had bought a couple b4 deciding to do the upgrade. Mark K. says it is optional as the internal filter does such a good job. So when I run out of TP filters I'll leave the canister empty.
I don't know if I have this right: IIRC the earliest '08s had the external filter moved to right near the trans and "might" have also had the new internal one too. But the external one quickly went away and all the newer trans have only the internal...
I don't know if I have this right: IIRC the earliest '08s had the external filter moved to right near the trans and "might" have also had the new internal one too. But the external one quickly went away and all the newer trans have only the internal...
#21
The external filter went away the at the same time the internal filter was upgraded. It was an either/or, they never ran both.
#22
The newer internal filter is slightly better than the external filter. I forget the micron ratings, it's been too long. The external filter only sees 10% of what's going through the coolers, and when the trans is below about 165F the flow to the coolers is cut by 90%. So once you have the newer internal filter there isn't a need for the external filter.
The external filter went away the at the same time the internal filter was upgraded. It was an either/or, they never ran both.
The external filter went away the at the same time the internal filter was upgraded. It was an either/or, they never ran both.
The Derale pan appears to hold more fluid over the OEM pans..........
Fits E4OD, 4R100, 5R110 & 5R110W
Increases fluid capacity 7 quarts 10 ounces
Lowers Transmission Fluid Temperatures
Includes Gasket & Drain Plug
#23
#25
#26
I fixed the typo..
Short answers.. the 08 internal filter filters all the trans fluid. The 'toilet paper' external filter only gets a small % of the fluid.
Ford decided to upgrade to the internal filters in '08 - THAT should say something..
This will provide all the reasons..
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ns-filter.html
#27
I fixed the typo..
Short answers.. the 08 internal filter filters all the trans fluid. The 'toilet paper' external filter only gets a small % of the oil.
Ford decided to upgrade to the internal filters in '08 - THAT should say something..
This will provide all the reasons..
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ns-filter.html
Short answers.. the 08 internal filter filters all the trans fluid. The 'toilet paper' external filter only gets a small % of the oil.
Ford decided to upgrade to the internal filters in '08 - THAT should say something..
This will provide all the reasons..
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ns-filter.html
#28
The downside is too much fluid would take longer (or too long for normal driving) to heat to normal/optimum operating temp.
The pan *could* be a heat exchanger in and of itself, but I think it would either need more "tubes" and forced air through them, and/or cooling fins on the bottom.
It would be easy to calculate the area and size of the fins needed to be effective, but it's unlikely the area of the bottom of the pan is large enough to be a "stand alone" heat exchanger.
And it's hanging down in an area where it could get "whacked"! Not a really good place to place a heat exchanger for a critical component.....
Regards,
Rick
#29
#30