1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

78 f150 4x4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 01-10-2015, 07:15 PM
Greg B's Avatar
Greg B
Greg B is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I wish I still had that 79. That was by far the best truck I have ever owned. Not much for fuel efficiency, but simple and reliable as they come.
 
  #17  
Old 01-11-2015, 10:04 AM
F-250 WARHORSE's Avatar
F-250 WARHORSE
F-250 WARHORSE is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: starship enterprise
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
No reason to swap. Standard f250 4x4 had d44 front and d60 rear, optional d60 front, 79 f350 4x4 all d60 front. Still HP axle. f250/350 has leaf springs with push/pull steering. A very rugged design and strong, however the big 3" wide leaf springs hold it in place while the shoving and tugging takes place, I would be afraid that the front coils with the bushings would get clapped out soon from the push/pull of the steering. Be more work to convert 3/4 ton to crossover, but probably necessary.

Next in line is the front brakes. f150s and broncos had 1 piston calipers, f250s had bigger rotors and 2 piston calipers. This might pose a problem, possibly need to swap proportioning valves, master cylinders, boosters, ask number dummy, he will tell you that there are some crazy combo of brake components available, like 200 or something. Also might need to run atleast 16" wheels.

The 9" rear is very strong, easy to rebuild, and light weight. Keep it. Nothing will be gained by going to a rear 60 other than having the notorious carrier bearing issue of the inner race spinning on the carrier and ruining the bearing and the carrier. Good luck.
 
  #18  
Old 04-12-2015, 08:07 PM
shannonguy's Avatar
shannonguy
shannonguy is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just curious....any issues swapping the 302 in a 77 F100 for a 351Windsor? Truck has A/C if that is an issue. I assume the 351M engines were about the same width as a windsor. And the C4 trans should go with a windsor no problem. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks
 
  #19  
Old 04-12-2015, 09:33 PM
bkaul's Avatar
bkaul
bkaul is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
302W and 351W have same motor mounts, bell housing pattern, etc. 351 has slightly higher deck height, so any accessory brackets that bolt to the head will be different, and intake manifolds aren't interchangeable.
 
  #20  
Old 07-05-2015, 08:16 PM
shannonguy's Avatar
shannonguy
shannonguy is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
would there be any at all problems swapping a 79 F250 2wd body onto a 79 F250 4x4 chassis. I can't think of any but it seems like ive heard of some differences with 2wd and 4wd beds. Can't be anything major i wouldn't imagine if its even true
 
  #21  
Old 07-05-2015, 11:03 PM
bkaul's Avatar
bkaul
bkaul is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
The '67-early '77 "High Boy" 4x4 F-250s had a narrower rear frame width that would put the holes for the bed mounts in a different place. Not sure the same is true of the '79s though - might just bolt right up. Even with the ones that didn't line up, you could either drill new holes in the bed or make brackets to bolt to the frame though.
 
  #22  
Old 07-07-2015, 08:32 PM
shannonguy's Avatar
shannonguy
shannonguy is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so no major problems with doing it?
 
  #23  
Old 07-08-2015, 11:33 AM
fordcrzymike's Avatar
fordcrzymike
fordcrzymike is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tamaroa, IL
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by shannonguy
would there be any at all problems swapping a 79 F250 2wd body onto a 79 F250 4x4 chassis. I can't think of any but it seems like ive heard of some differences with 2wd and 4wd beds. Can't be anything major i wouldn't imagine if its even true
No, there shouldn't be any major problems. As previously stated, the highboys have a 4" narrower frame in the rear. The "Lowboys" (77.5-79) have the same overall frame dimensions as the 2WD trucks. Swapping bodies should be a bolt in process that's very commonly done.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boilermaker79
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
01-24-2013 07:56 AM
s.squared-39
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
04-27-2009 12:48 AM
s.squared-39
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
02-20-2009 10:39 AM
coolmint94
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
1
07-04-2004 01:51 AM



Quick Reply: 78 f150 4x4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM.