Interesting
#1
Interesting
Looking Back: 1961-63 Ford F-100 "Unibody" Pickups - PickupTrucks.com News
I always wondered why Ford came out with a new cab but not a new bed in 61.
It seemed that Ford was banking on the unibody to be the sales leader in trucks.
I always wondered why Ford came out with a new cab but not a new bed in 61.
It seemed that Ford was banking on the unibody to be the sales leader in trucks.
#2
I think is it interesting that the truck was a huge flop back in the day and very sought after today.
John
#3
Ford management did have reservations about the integral body from the get go, a did not release it for the 1961 F 350 pickup or the 4X4 models. The idea was to take the "Ranchero" concept one step farther for light duty full size pickups. The South American market didn't like it either, they simply sliced the integral body and got a separate bed with the same styling. Why Ford didn't follow the South American pattern after learning of customer resistance is a mystery.
#4
I absolutely loved the uni I had way back when. Only problem I had was having to replace the rear window, twice. Too much body twisting I guess. If I used the truck for just running around town and not as it was designed for, I most likely wouldn't have had any problems. But, back then, we actually used our trucks.
Wish i still had it today. ;-(
Wish i still had it today. ;-(
#5
Hijack alert: at about 0:46 into this video, you can see the operation of the clutch pedal, which has an accordion/bellows style firewall seal. My 62 just uses a slab of rubber with a slit in it there. Anyone know if that seal is available?
~Steve
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Because the fenders looked great, hard to improve on perfection! Look what happened in 1980 when they did change the design of the fenders and tailgate. GM kept the same fenders between 1955 and 1966, two different generations.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bankerbob
1961 - 1963 F100 Unibody
7
04-12-2018 10:35 AM
53OlderThanMe
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
10-23-2009 10:24 PM