351w budget torque gains?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-27-2014, 11:09 PM
AmericanPride's Avatar
AmericanPride
AmericanPride is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
351w budget torque gains?

Hi everybody, I'm Garrett and I own a 94 f150 4X4 with a 6inch lift kit and 35x12.50 procomps Xterrains on 15x10 rims. The only real thing I done to the engine beside routine maintenance is put E3 spark plugs in and put a 3 inch exhaust pipe from the cat back to were the original exhaust dumped out.

My goal is to achieve as much torque within 1500-3000rpms as possible on regular pump gas while trying to stay under a $1000 per upgrade.

I'm looking into aftermarket heads but I'm not sure on what to look for in them to choose one over the other so any help on that would be greatly appreciated.
The Dart aluminum heads seem popular and are within the price range.

I also been planning on getting shorty headers for more low end torque but I read a couple post of people suggesting long tubes for more torque. Not sure if they were talking about the top end or not but that puzzled me a little.
The headers do need to be durable because I do take my truck in the mud.
I know summit makes a pair for real cheap but they are a thin gage tubing.

I do plan on port/polishing the new heads as well.

Cams are also another upgrade I plan on doing. I keep finding people suggesting crane for their products.

I will post links to the parts that I've been looking at tomorrow from my PC because right now I'm just using my phone.
 
  #2  
Old 10-28-2014, 04:42 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,898
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
What gearing does the truck have? It needs at least 4.56 and nothing else you do will have as much impact.

Best engine upgrade for low rpm power would be long tube headers and a 2.5" mendrel bent single exhaust system.
 
  #3  
Old 06-26-2016, 09:05 PM
eriklane's Avatar
eriklane
eriklane is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Rockford, MI
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I have a similar situation, 86 F250 4x4 with a c6 and a 351w. I've gotten a Crane cam for brute torque, and a friend gave me a ported intake (dual plane), I have a Holley 80457 4bbl and am now trying to figure out what exhaust to get. So can we get a definitive answer on shorts vs longs for pulling power only and what else to finish the exhaust.
 
  #4  
Old 06-28-2016, 08:11 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,898
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
Originally Posted by eriklane
So can we get a definitive answer on shorts vs longs for pulling power only and what else to finish the exhaust.
Longtubes are best for low rpm power with a moderately sized single exhaust to keep gas velocity high. Your motor would also benefit from a cylinder head change, late model E7TE or F1ZE or F3ZE GT40 heads would increase compression 1/2 to 3/4 of a point up to roughly 8.8 to 9.2:1 and in the case of the GT40 increase airflow potential 25% top 30%.
 
  #5  
Old 06-28-2016, 09:07 AM
eriklane's Avatar
eriklane
eriklane is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Rockford, MI
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I'm no expert, at all. Not only does the Summit youtube show that shorts are better for bottom end torque than long, but this site also outlines why. Seems longs are better for the top end stuff, shorts for low.


https://www.sandersonheaders.com/lets-get-technical.html


"If you are using the engine in the 1,500 to 3,500 RPM range, which is typical for a street-driven vehicle, you definitely want 1-1/2" to 1-5/8" primary tubes for any small block and 1-3/4" to 1-7/8" for a big block engine. Any bigger and you will lose a considerable amount of low end torque. beyond 3,500 RPM it is a question of where you want the power peaks. As you can see from the charts on this page, small tube headers do not lose their edge in horsepower and torque until you exceed 5,500 RPM."


Seems pretty clear I guess, and I'm definitely not looking at high rpm, plus, fitment issues, so shorties would be the way to go, but, I will measure my stock manifolds and may end up sticking with them. All I want is pulling power, not racing top end.
 
  #6  
Old 06-28-2016, 09:40 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,898
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
Your quote talks about tube diameter not tube length, are you confusing the two parameters? And the graph on the link starts at 3000rpm which is solidly into the midrange for these engines so I don't know that it's relative either.

Short tube headers produce biggest gains at midrange rpms, if your motor makes power out to 6500rpm then maybe 4000rpm can be considered midrange but that is peak HP territory for one of these truck motors. Longtubes do produce more gains at higher rpms than short tubes but they also do the same at very low rpms and it's those gains that are useful in these trucks.

Here's a dyno graph from a 5.0 Mustang article comparing the two header types..

 
  #7  
Old 06-29-2016, 06:17 AM
eriklane's Avatar
eriklane
eriklane is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Rockford, MI
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
You're right about the 3000 rpm, I blew right by that. I said I wanted low end power for pulling only. For low end to mid, shorts seem to be the way to go, agree?
 
  #8  
Old 06-29-2016, 11:51 AM
eriklane's Avatar
eriklane
eriklane is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Rockford, MI
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
AAAAAnd, this article seems to say longs are better all around than shorts or stock, shockingly better...(so confusing!)


Manifolds Vs. Headers - Mopar Muscle Magazine
 
  #9  
Old 06-29-2016, 02:32 PM
jimbbski's Avatar
jimbbski
jimbbski is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The thing is that any header on a 5.8L will help performance. The stock cast iron manifolds are a cork on a 5.0L and they are the same or worse on the 5.8L.
 
  #10  
Old 06-29-2016, 02:35 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,898
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
Compared to manifolds any header is better but for the rpm range where most street driven trucks operate longtubes produce the best gain
 
  #11  
Old 05-05-2019, 05:58 AM
Bill Sandy's Avatar
Bill Sandy
Bill Sandy is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up 351 W budget Torque Gains

Best budget HP gains are from the used factory headers, Stainless, Short, Thick, online for 50 bucks. You really won't notice any difference on or off road, with or without trailer, at any RPM range you need to use.
 
  #12  
Old 05-05-2019, 10:52 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
Longtubes are best for low rpm power with a moderately sized single exhaust to keep gas velocity high. Your motor would also benefit from a cylinder head change, late model E7TE or F1ZE or F3ZE GT40 heads would increase compression 1/2 to 3/4 of a point up to roughly 8.8 to 9.2:1 and in the case of the GT40 increase airflow potential 25% top 30%.
He's got a 94 so it's already got E7TE heads
 
  #13  
Old 05-05-2019, 10:54 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by jimbbski
The thing is that any header on a 5.8L will help performance. The stock cast iron manifolds are a cork on a 5.0L and they are the same or worse on the 5.8L.
The choke point on his engine is the Thermactor bumps inside the exhaust ports. These can easily be removed with a porting bit, but the heads need to come off first to do it.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gman97005
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
03-24-2014 02:17 PM
ford5.8
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
15
10-09-2010 10:34 PM
peckhamjusten
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
10
09-02-2007 09:54 AM
malync2
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
06-01-2005 10:45 PM
ClatonK
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
5
09-09-2004 11:32 PM



Quick Reply: 351w budget torque gains?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM.