1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Stock 56 bias ply tire size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-28-2014, 08:50 AM
jimcar-9's Avatar
jimcar-9
jimcar-9 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sweden (Fagersta)
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Stock 56 bias ply tire size?

So

What tires size and brand (other than 15") was the 56 F100 truck eguipped with from the factory?

Thanks in advance
 
  #2  
Old 09-28-2014, 10:33 AM
bigwin56f100's Avatar
bigwin56f100
bigwin56f100 is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: AKRON ohio
Posts: 8,206
Received 835 Likes on 473 Posts
I dont have my books in front of me, but, the stock tire size was 6.70x15 with an optional 7.10x15
I think you could get a 6.50x16 also. Like I said I dont have the books here to verify
 
  #3  
Old 09-28-2014, 12:51 PM
raytasch's Avatar
raytasch
raytasch is offline
Believe Nothing

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: W. Central FL.
Posts: 7,327
Received 244 Likes on 153 Posts
According to the shop manual, you might find:
6.00x16 4 pr,
6.00x16 6 pr,
6.50x16 6 pr
6.70x15 4 pr,
6.70x15 6 pr,
7.10x15 4 pr
7.10x15 6 pr

These are shown to be passenger car type tires, all on drop center rims.

Ford and Firestone still had a very close long time business relationship at that time. In addition, there had been a recent, late 1940s, marriage between the two families. Good chance the tires were Firestone.
 
  #4  
Old 09-28-2014, 01:06 PM
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
truckdog62563 is online now
Marmon-Herrington Man
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 11,698
Received 260 Likes on 214 Posts
Kevin - the chassis catalog lists 6.50" six ply, 6.50" eight ply, and 7.10" eight ply. James Wagner agrees with you. He says ".....the new 15" x 5" wheels with 6.70" x 15" four ply. As a result of this shift in tire usage, the formerly standard 6.00 x 16" four ply was added to the option list together with the six ply 6.70 x 15" and 7.10 x 15" sizes." This is quoted from Ford Trucks Since 1905 by James K. Wagner. I strongly recommend this book to jimcar-9. Stu

Edit - there you go, Ray has the best reference. Stu
 
  #5  
Old 09-28-2014, 01:20 PM
abeagle's Avatar
abeagle
abeagle is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Abingdon. VA
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not a 56 but a 55, but I have old 6.50x16 4p bias on my 55 that was a telephone company truck and not purchased from a dealer showroom originally. Same for older spare that was with the truck.

Bruce
 
  #6  
Old 09-28-2014, 08:40 PM
cokeb5's Avatar
cokeb5
cokeb5 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not to hijack this thread but I have (2) 16" of my 56 hate to see them go to the recycle bin if anyone could use them.

craig
 
  #7  
Old 09-28-2014, 08:42 PM
bigwin56f100's Avatar
bigwin56f100
bigwin56f100 is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: AKRON ohio
Posts: 8,206
Received 835 Likes on 473 Posts
cokeb5 sent you a message
 
  #8  
Old 09-29-2014, 06:49 AM
jimcar-9's Avatar
jimcar-9
jimcar-9 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sweden (Fagersta)
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Thanks guys!

I will look into that book, see where I could find it.

The only ones I can find today is the 6.7 and 7.1 4 ply, So I guess I will shoot for the 7.1.

Ok guys, what about bias ply feeling?

I have heard ups and mostly downs compared to radials.

But with a completely refurbished. Chassis? Can it be that bad?

I am not looking for a racer, just a safe daily driver for the summer spring, fall period.
 
  #9  
Old 09-29-2014, 07:13 AM
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
truckdog62563 is online now
Marmon-Herrington Man
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 11,698
Received 260 Likes on 214 Posts
Let the arguments commence! Bias or radial? I like bias ply. That's what the truck was engineered for, they provide much easier steering input at rest and low speed, and they impose less strain on the old rims from the lateral loads inherent with the radial tire construction. Stu
 
  #10  
Old 09-29-2014, 07:20 AM
bigwin56f100's Avatar
bigwin56f100
bigwin56f100 is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: AKRON ohio
Posts: 8,206
Received 835 Likes on 473 Posts
Jimmy,
I have the 6.70x15 on my red 56 and my 56 panel. I LOVE the way they drive. I will say that on certain road surfaces they can be a handfull to drive, but isnt that what its all about?


I have seen 56's with the 7.10x15 and I personally did not like the look, it may have been the tire brand too. I'm running the Firestones
 
  #11  
Old 09-29-2014, 07:29 AM
raytasch's Avatar
raytasch
raytasch is offline
Believe Nothing

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: W. Central FL.
Posts: 7,327
Received 244 Likes on 153 Posts
I learned to drive with bias and drove with them for years. When radials became available, I switched and only went back when I was doing a correct "restoration". If I am going to drive the vehicle, no way would I use bias.
 
  #12  
Old 09-29-2014, 07:52 AM
bigwin56f100's Avatar
bigwin56f100
bigwin56f100 is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: AKRON ohio
Posts: 8,206
Received 835 Likes on 473 Posts
Originally Posted by raytasch
I learned to drive with bias and drove with them for years. When radials became available, I switched and only went back when I was doing a correct "restoration". If I am going to drive the vehicle, no way would I use bias.
But WHY?
I have put several thousands of miles on my new bias tires. They wear like iron, get great fuel mileage, steer easy. Really my rigs drive like a new truck, except on a road that has heavy grooves. I drove the panel twice to PF (1100 mile trips each) and we were running 70-75 mph all the way. The second trip, the back end of the panel was full to the roof with parts and we still got 17.5 mpg


I would NEVER drive a 56 with radials again
 
  #13  
Old 09-29-2014, 08:27 AM
jimcar-9's Avatar
jimcar-9
jimcar-9 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sweden (Fagersta)
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
I will most probably go with bias for the cheer look of it.

Kevin

What about close up photos of the 6.7? I was leaning towards the 7.1. For the load capacity. But what difference are there between these.
What Firestone supplier did you all use? Coker or someone else?
 
  #14  
Old 09-29-2014, 08:42 AM
bigwin56f100's Avatar
bigwin56f100
bigwin56f100 is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: AKRON ohio
Posts: 8,206
Received 835 Likes on 473 Posts
<center>
</center><center></center>
 
  #15  
Old 09-29-2014, 09:10 AM
abe's Avatar
abe
abe is offline
One Meadow Green Owner

Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Central PA
Posts: 22,153
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,445 Posts
When I fixed up my 54 and had it painted in 1999 I put radials on it. It took bumps real nice. It went over railroad tracks as good as our mini van. But as mentioned above, at slow speeds, parking, backing, etc it steered incredibly hard..... too much rubber on the road. I kept the fronts over inflated to make steering a bit easier.

Two years ago I needed new tires in the front to pass inspection. I got 6.00 x 16 6-ply bias tires. Steering was very easy. Last week I got the same bias ply on the rear. The ride is a bit less smooth but the steering and the looks outweigh that.
 


Quick Reply: Stock 56 bias ply tire size?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 PM.