what carb are you guys running on 390?

  #1  
Old 08-11-2014, 10:46 AM
lpdcjr's Avatar
lpdcjr
lpdcjr is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what carb are you guys running on 390?

I ended up with a 390 a couple weeks ago. I replaced the turd badger pistons with flat top silvolites. Now there riiiiight near 0 deck. Heads are d2 with stock valves. New valves and springs etc etc. No port matching. Flowtech headers. 1961 ford aluminum 4 barrel. Elgin 966 cam. Heads have been surfaced. Compression is 9.something. But with flat tops, d2 heads, and right at 0 deck I'd say 9.4-9.5 should be a safe assumption. Anyway. I have two carbs. 1406 and a 1407. Engine is going in a 73 f250. 4 speed trans. 3.73 rear. Never really driven hard. Will pull a small boat and haul firewood and whatever else needs to be done. Which carb would be better suited for this truck? I'm seeing opinions for both. I could try both and see which works best, and eventually I'm sure I will, but my biggest concern for now is which carb will work best during break in period. Might not even really be that big of a deal but I just thought I'd ask.
 
  #2  
Old 08-11-2014, 06:23 PM
Raptor119's Avatar
Raptor119
Raptor119 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portland, CT
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Between the 1406 and the 1406 I guess I would go with the 1406.

You may want to correct your post as I think you made a mistake.
 
  #3  
Old 08-11-2014, 06:27 PM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
jowilker is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 24,552
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
About 500 cfm should run the truck just fine, no more than 600.



John
 
  #4  
Old 08-11-2014, 07:13 PM
lpdcjr's Avatar
lpdcjr
lpdcjr is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haha thanks raptor.
 
  #5  
Old 08-12-2014, 08:03 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor119
Between the 1406 and the 1406 I guess I would go with the 1406.

You may want to correct your post as I think you made a mistake.
Ditto. His comp ratio is in the low tens. My choice for it ? Holley 3310 750
 
  #6  
Old 08-12-2014, 08:13 AM
lpdcjr's Avatar
lpdcjr
lpdcjr is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For future clarification I have a 1406 and a 1407. I'd run a qjet if I could but I don't like adapter plates.
On another note...reallt think my cr will be in the low 10s?
 
  #7  
Old 08-12-2014, 07:08 PM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by mfnheff
.
On another note...reallt think my cr will be in the low 10s?
Definitely. You've built what amounts to a GT390 with those pistons and heads, along with the hotter cam. I upgraded the high compression 390 2V in the 68 Merc I had a few years back with a Crane 272* Energizer, keeping the factory flat tops and C8AE-H heads (same heads as your D2's) topped with a 428PI intake and a 750 Holley. It wouldn't digest 87 octane fuel but was fine with 89. Also ran a 67 GT390 in a 70 F100 with a similar cam, it too was fine on 89.
 
  #8  
Old 08-13-2014, 09:31 AM
MIKES 68 F100's Avatar
MIKES 68 F100
MIKES 68 F100 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Antelope Valley ,CA
Posts: 4,744
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
my truck likes the 3310 750 , just need to change the primary jets down a size .
I had a 600,650dp on there for a little runs much better with the 750.
oh I did put an adjustable vacuum secondary diaphragm on
 
  #9  
Old 08-14-2014, 04:07 PM
tater_51's Avatar
tater_51
tater_51 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I run an old Autolite 4100 on my 416, easy to rebuild, tune, might not be the newest technology but it get's my 75 F100 down the road.
 
  #10  
Old 08-14-2014, 04:10 PM
lpdcjr's Avatar
lpdcjr
lpdcjr is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info guys. I'm gonna try the 1405 I ended up with. It was in a 1406 box. The guy let me have a jet kit since I didn't argue with his price so I should be able to get it where it runs right. Hopefully the engine swap will happen this weekend
 
  #11  
Old 08-15-2014, 05:47 AM
Hypoid's Avatar
Hypoid
Hypoid is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by mfnheff
Heads are d2 with stock valves... No port matching... 1961 ford aluminum 4 barrel.
Big port manifold to small port head... You might get better throttle response from a later intake and 600 cfm carb.
 
  #12  
Old 08-15-2014, 06:17 AM
lpdcjr's Avatar
lpdcjr
lpdcjr is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hypoid
Big port manifold to small port head... You might get better throttle response from a later intake and 600 cfm carb.
Something like that. I'll run this intake for the time being. I was curious to see how it runs with the mismatched ports myself. Since I'm not building an engine for all out performance I probably won't be too upset. If it were something I'd race and spend time at high rpms I'd not even consider the intake/head combo. But we'll see.
 
  #13  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:38 AM
raven3's Avatar
raven3
raven3 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Stock Autolite 2V 2100 with retrofit manual choke.
 
  #14  
Old 08-18-2014, 11:04 AM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
Large port manifold to small port head might cause gas to drop out of the mixture as it hits the "wall" surrounding the small port. Causing all sorts of weird issues that'll have you thinking the carb needs more tuning.

I could be wrong of course
 
  #15  
Old 08-18-2014, 02:18 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,839
Received 1,583 Likes on 1,291 Posts
"Loading up" at idle or low revs could be one result. Followed by a bog and a cloud of black smoke when you step into it a bit more.

ymmv, doesn't cost much to try it.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: what carb are you guys running on 390?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.