Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2015+ F150
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


2015+ F150 Discuss the 2015 Ford F150 SPONSORED BY:

View Poll Results: Should Ford Have Kept the 6.2L V8 for the 2015 F150?
Yes, it should be able across the lineup. 65 58.04%
Yes, but only on high end models like in 2014 10 8.93%
No, it isnt needed and the previous take rate proves that. 37 33.04%
Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll

Question of the Week: Should Ford have kept the 6.2L V8 for the 2015 F150?

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31  
Old 09-10-2014, 01:19 AM
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx AlaskanEx is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 10,181
AlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputation
Yes it should be an option. I don't care as I already got my 6.2 F-150 and you will have to pry it from my cold dead hands.

I drove all the current engine offerings and it's the only one that really puts that smile on my face.
__________________
Russ-
2011 F-150 Limited #3679 6.2 V8 4x4, Retrax bed cover, Husky mud flaps and wheel liners, HIDs, 35% tint
2002 Excursion Limited V10 4x4, 2.5/2" lift, HIDs,LEDs,20" DC wheels
1998 Expedition XLT 5.4 4x4,HIDs,16x8 ultra wheels,LEDs, HIDs
1991 F-250 lairat 4x4 5.0, 7'6" BOSS snow plow, Back Rack, Strobes, Work lights
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-10-2014, 05:04 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 21,371
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
I saw a RAM commercial last night touting the 2015 Hemi 5.7L with 395 HP and up to 22 MPG's. It can be done with some technology but the 6.2L wasn't the answer.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-12-2014, 10:08 AM
RigTrash601's Avatar
RigTrash601 RigTrash601 is offline
Non Compus Mentis
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Hattiesburg, Ms.
Posts: 3,271
RigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputation
Mitch Thornhill RigTrash601
I just feel Ford is making a blunder not offering the engine in at least a limited production truck, even in this day and age, there are still folks that purchase a vehicle for the way it makes them feel, and driving experience and not MPG stats, etc.
I have no doubt Ford trucks will remain on top, but I feel it will be a smaller margin, the above mentioned consumer will swap to a Ram or a GM with 6.2L.
__________________
Mitch...
2014 F250 6.7L PSD,Platinum 4x4, White, Pecan Leather, FX4 package. H&S, S&B, 4" Flo-Pro Full Delete. 4" - 4 Link BDS Lift Fox 2.0 Shocks / Dual Steering Stabilizer Fuel Rampage 20x10 w / 35x12.5x20 Toyo MT'sRIP Charles Glen Thornhill Sr. Feb. 07 1943 / Oct. 25 2014.... I Miss You Pop!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-15-2014, 06:32 PM
Builtihtuff Builtihtuff is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 324
Builtihtuff is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hmm

i say keep the 6.2L i regret i was not allowed to factory order my 2014

i love the 5.0L dont get me wrong it owns my 1995 5.Slow but i want to know that if i Step on her there is no question im flying... people who buy a 6.2 need it to haul heavy or haul a$$ why else would u buy one its not a cruise the slow shopping mall scene kinda engine...

as for ford i love ford and will continue to buy one i just wish i had a 6.2L but hey we cant win them all right...

6.2L Hennessy tuned - just a suggestion


__________________
2014 F150 XLT XTR Blue Jean CCSB 5.0L 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-11-2014, 04:32 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD 640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,067
640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.
I voted yes.

I agree with those who state it should be an option at the very least.

With a few simple upgrades like direct injection and DOHC setup it could easily outperform GM's new 6.2L, and if Ford really wanted to invest in it, they could go from cast iron to all aluminum and essentially it would become a 6.2L Coyote, which would be bad ***.

I stand strongly for having more options instead of less.

Someone stated in an earlier post that they believe the 3.5L N/A V6 is pretty useless, and other than its likely use in fleet vehicles I tend to agree. People who prefer N/A engine's in their trucks will almost always choose the V8 over the V6,

As they essentially stated I think the engine lineup should go,

2.7L
5.0L
3.5L Ecoboost
6.2L / ?.? Twin Turbo V8?
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-11-2014, 05:29 PM
xr7gt390's Avatar
xr7gt390 xr7gt390 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North West Indiana
Posts: 677
xr7gt390 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.xr7gt390 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
The V6 NA engines attract a certain type of buyer. My brother owns a 2014 V6 F150 and my dad owns a 2001 V6 F150. They both work in the steel industry and like vehicles that have ground clearance to get around the snow ruts semi truck leave in the lots. They like a vehicle that can haul what they need, tow a utility trail and make an occasional hunting trip. If Ford didn't have a V6 they both would be driving some thing else.
Today's V6 puts down better performance numbers than the V8's of yesterday all while getting better mileage. I would guess the demand for a V6 is much greater than the demand for the 6.2L V8.
I do hate to see the 6.2 go. There's nothing like the sound of a big inch V8. Back when I was young our motto was "There's no substitute for displacement". I'll probably always stick with the EcoBoost V6 however, there is some sort of satisfaction knowing that your brand has a big V8 in it's lineup. I hope the 6.2 returns.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-11-2014, 10:09 PM
Lectrocuted Lectrocuted is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 666
Lectrocuted is starting off with a positive reputation.
Voted yes. Loving my fx4 so far. Only 1200 miles though.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-12-2014, 10:31 AM
Scorpion67 Scorpion67 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 389
Scorpion67 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I vote no, only because if you need an engine that big, you should get a more capable truck to go with it, like an F250, which will soon have the same cab as the F150. There's never been a huge price gap to move up to the higher class, and if it were an option in the F150, it would be a $3,000 option anyway. I can see why Ford chose not to offer it. GM is hardly pushing their 6.2 either. Late availability, only optional on LTZ, High Country, and Denali.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-17-2014, 11:07 AM
bigblueknight's Avatar
bigblueknight bigblueknight is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boise,Idaho
Posts: 116
bigblueknight is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I think the 6.2l or a suitable replacement should have been left as an option almost exclusively because you're competitors offer a big v8 in their trucks. There is always going to be a certain group of people out there who aren't going to buy into the eco boost over a v8 as evidenced by the constant debates I see on here and f150forum.com over what's better the 5.0 or the ecoboost. I have to admit I feel still feel a little silly sometimes telling someone I have a 3.5l v6 in my truck because to me a full size truck and a v8 go together like biscuits and gravy or bacon and eggs. Obviously that is changing with the rise of the ecoboost but everyone still figures I have a big v8 under the hood until I tell them otherwise. The 6.2 wasn't an option in the king ranch so I went with the ecoboost max tow package once I decided that I didn't need a f250 with the 6.2. I do a lot more towing and hauling than I initially thought I would when I bought my truck and If I could do it over I would go 350 with the 6.2 but the eco boost gets the job done. I love having the power of the 6.2 when I need to tow something but not having the mileage of the 6.2 when I'm driving around unloaded.
__________________
Taylor

2013 F-150 King Ranch 4x4 Ecoboost Max Tow 6.5ft bed
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-22-2015, 03:11 PM
brokenleg brokenleg is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
brokenleg is starting off with a positive reputation.
The 6.2 is rare in the 150s...................But I bought a 2013, with the 6.2.(used) I simply wanted the 6.2 because I tow quite a bit. but I don't drive the truck everyday. Should have they kept it as an option? probably not. very few were built.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-28-2015, 02:22 PM
elemint elemint is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: outback
Posts: 739
elemint is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ford makes too many engines as it is. I would like them to use no more than 2 engine options for any vehicle. Imagine how much money could be saved by everyone if parts inventories could be cut in half?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-28-2015, 02:34 PM
NYCruiser's Avatar
NYCruiser NYCruiser is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Yonkers, NY
Posts: 181
NYCruiser is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tseekins View Post
I saw a RAM commercial last night touting the 2015 Hemi 5.7L with 395 HP and up to 22 MPG's. It can be done with some technology but the 6.2L wasn't the answer.
The Hemi is a strong motor, but not without issues. The cylinder deactivation is absolutely terrible. Not to mention the very common "Hemi Valve Tick". Also the shift algorithms that always keep it in a higher gear makes it sluggish as heck whenever you stomp on it unless you are manually holding the truck in lower gears. Not to mention that it comes wrapped in a truck with all kinds of quality issues.

I just traded my 2014 Hemi ram because I couldn't take it anymore and bought a 2015 F-250 with 6.2.

The Ram would leave this 250 sitting at a light it was so quick, but that's not what the 250 is for. I have no regrets.

Back on point - I see why Ford dropped the 6.2 from the F-150, but think they still should have updated the valve train at the same time for the 250's.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:23 PM
Frantz Frantz is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Lewisberry, Penn
Posts: 172
Frantz is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Frantz is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
if you need the 6.2, you can get one on the base f250 for little more than the up-charge would cost on an f150. Also, if you need more than the 3.5 can put out, you're really in SuperDuty territory anyhow.
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2015, 09:23 PM
 
 
 
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question of the Week: 5.0L V8 or 3.5L EcoBoost to Replace 6.2L Super Duty Engine? Patrick R. 2017 Super Duty 217 04-12-2015 10:31 PM
The Obligatory 2015 F-150 vs (Videos) 640 CI Aluminum FORD 2015+ F150 2 03-26-2015 05:10 PM
Question of the Week: Does 315hp make you want to buy the 2015 Edge Sport? Patrick R. General Automotive Discussion 5 02-10-2015 09:31 PM
Question of the Week: Do you like the EcoBoost engine in the new Raptor? Patrick R. 2015+ F150 3 01-19-2015 09:24 AM
Question of the Week: Should Ford have used the Lincoln Navigator EcoBoost in the F150? Patrick R. 2015+ F150 8 12-21-2014 04:53 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2015+ F150

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


Participate In The Forums

Create new posts and participate in discussions. It's free!

Sign Up »


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup