Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-15-2014, 09:07 PM
brandon mauldin brandon mauldin is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 40
brandon mauldin is starting off with a positive reputation.
89 cam and motor swap need some advice!

So I picked up a 302 roller motor the other day with only 60,000 miles on it for 250$! I'm gettin it ready to go in my 89 f150 on 42s so I figured while I got the time and got it out why not freshin it up a bit and give it a little more ummff! Well so far I picked up a set of gt40p heads and and I wanna add a mild cam, I don't want anything major it'll still be on the speed density system and I do drive it on and off the road quite a bit. Iv been lookin at the comp XE264HR cam and it seems to be pretty much what I'm lookin for. Question is will this cam alone work with stock gt40p heads or am I gonna need to change springs/lifters/rocker arms.. Ect ect..? I'd like to keep them stock if possible and also I'll be running long tube headers what kinda gains will this set up give me?? Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-16-2014, 09:20 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,708
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
That will run on SD but I think it will be pushing the limits of the system It would be a good idea if you installed a wideband O2 sensor to keep an eye on the Air/fuel ratio, if it goes lean at higher rpms you can try an adjustable FPR to raise fuel pressure a little from stock.

As for the heads, I don 't believe the stock springs will support the lift that cam generates so an aftermarket spring setup will be needed. No need for anything but stock rockers and pushrods however.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-16-2014, 09:39 AM
F350 1990's Avatar
F350 1990 F350 1990 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 351
F350 1990 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Your hard efforts may be wasted on that Speed Density system.
__________________
2011 Powerstroke 6.7L 2009 Powerstroke 6.4L
2004 Powerstroke (Cummins)
2003 Powerstroke 6.0L (Non Bullet-Proofed Survivor)
2003 E-150 5.8L 2002 F-350 7.3L
1990 F-350 460 (600 hp, Turbocharged Project)
1966 Fairlane GT 351C (10 sec quarter miler)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-16-2014, 05:27 PM
brandon mauldin brandon mauldin is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 40
brandon mauldin is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well on comps website it says that cam should be used with 1.7 rockers and I believe that the stock ones on gt40p heads are 1.6.. ? So if I use it with the stock rockers it'll bring the lift of the cam from .544 to like .512...right? So would I still need new springs? and second I read everywhere people say stay with a lsa of 114* with speed density but this cam has a lsa of 112*.. Would that cause a problem?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2014, 10:47 AM
brandon mauldin brandon mauldin is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 40
brandon mauldin is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well iv got the cam in and now my pushrods seem too short.. And also since I'm using the stock 1.6 rocker arms with the cam will I still need to upgrade valve springs? I really want to stay with the stock ones if possible..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-23-2014, 12:02 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005 rla2005 is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 8,396
rla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to behold
According to Camp Cams, the answer to your spring question is:
Click the image to open in full size.

No....

35-349-8 - Xtreme Energy? Hydraulic Roller Camshafts, Computer compatible (E.F.I.) with O.E. hydraulic roller cams 1985-95
__________________
2013 Ford Taurus Limited 3.5L
2006 Ford Mustang GT 5-speed 3v 4.6L
2002 Ford Explorer XLT 4WD 4.6L V8
rla2005@yahoo.com
Randy A | Central Illinois
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2014, 12:07 PM
brandon mauldin brandon mauldin is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 40
brandon mauldin is starting off with a positive reputation.
I knew if I went with the 1.7s if have to upgrade but I was hoping that with 1.6s I could get away with it. If I decide to go 1.7s anyway why are some good springs? Comp recommends some dual springs but I'd rather stay with some single trick flows or somthin that will work with my heads how they are
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-23-2014, 12:09 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,708
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon mauldin View Post
Well on comps website it says that cam should be used with 1.7 rockers
No it doesn't say that.. it says it can be used with 1.7 rockers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon mauldin View Post
and I believe that the stock ones on gt40p heads are 1.6.. ? So if I use it with the stock rockers it'll bring the lift of the cam from .544 to like .512...right?
Yes that is right on both counts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon mauldin View Post
So would I still need new springs?
Yes, and you need to check that they don't experience coil bind at full lift.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon mauldin View Post
and second I read everywhere people say stay with a lsa of 114* with speed density but this cam has a lsa of 112*..
What cam did you buy, the XE264HR-12 or the XE264HR-14? You should have bought the -14.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-23-2014, 12:12 PM
brandon mauldin brandon mauldin is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 40
brandon mauldin is starting off with a positive reputation.
I bought the xe264hr-12.. Would you recommend I stick with the stock 1.6 rockers and just upgrade springs and push rods or get the 1.7 rockers and upgrade springs and pushrods?....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-23-2014, 12:15 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,708
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon mauldin View Post
Well iv got the cam in and now my pushrods seem too short..
You are using roller lifters with that cam right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon mauldin View Post
And also since I'm using the stock 1.6 rocker arms with the cam will I still need to upgrade valve springs? I really want to stay with the stock ones if possible..
Stock springs may "work" but they are pretty weak and will allow valve float at higher RPMs, stiffer single springs are my suggestion as doubles will most likely require machineing of the spring seats.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-23-2014, 12:18 PM
brandon mauldin brandon mauldin is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 40
brandon mauldin is starting off with a positive reputation.
Yes I'm using the stock roller lifters they were in great shape. The motor was out of a 89 grand marqui. And what are some springs you would recommend?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-23-2014, 12:18 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,708
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon mauldin View Post
I bought the xe264hr-12.. Would you recommend I stick with the stock 1.6 rockers and just upgrade springs and push rods or get the 1.7 rockers and upgrade springs and pushrods?....
1.7 rockers are wasted on these heads as they don't flow any more past 0.500" lift, so you're just spending money for no gains.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-23-2014, 12:20 PM
brandon mauldin brandon mauldin is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 40
brandon mauldin is starting off with a positive reputation.
So upgrade springs get longer push rods and call it a day?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-23-2014, 12:47 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,708
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
You shouldn't need longer pushrods, what made you think the ones you have a too short?
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-23-2014, 01:00 PM
brandon mauldin brandon mauldin is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 40
brandon mauldin is starting off with a positive reputation.
I put the cam in last night and literally the push rods are wayyy loser than they were with the old cam like I can grab the lose ones wiggle them around and even up and down a little
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2014, 01:00 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cam with speed density brandon mauldin 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 2 08-18-2014 11:55 PM
Should I upgrade to a four barrel intake manifold jsutton Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 17 10-14-2013 11:20 AM
GT-40 Heads what is a good price???? RFAgrasshopper Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 4 05-09-2012 11:15 PM
302 4x4 build xc4jokestomper 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 20 05-07-2012 11:07 PM
1994 351wEFI rebuild GT40 or GT40p heads? Exhaust? mastermind929 Engine Swaps 8 11-05-2010 06:04 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


Participate In The Forums

Create new posts and participate in discussions. It's free!

Sign Up »





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup