Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-11-2014, 10:46 AM
mfnheff mfnheff is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 16
mfnheff is starting off with a positive reputation.
what carb are you guys running on 390?

I ended up with a 390 a couple weeks ago. I replaced the turd badger pistons with flat top silvolites. Now there riiiiight near 0 deck. Heads are d2 with stock valves. New valves and springs etc etc. No port matching. Flowtech headers. 1961 ford aluminum 4 barrel. Elgin 966 cam. Heads have been surfaced. Compression is 9.something. But with flat tops, d2 heads, and right at 0 deck I'd say 9.4-9.5 should be a safe assumption. Anyway. I have two carbs. 1406 and a 1407. Engine is going in a 73 f250. 4 speed trans. 3.73 rear. Never really driven hard. Will pull a small boat and haul firewood and whatever else needs to be done. Which carb would be better suited for this truck? I'm seeing opinions for both. I could try both and see which works best, and eventually I'm sure I will, but my biggest concern for now is which carb will work best during break in period. Might not even really be that big of a deal but I just thought I'd ask.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-11-2014, 06:23 PM
Raptor119 Raptor119 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portland, CT
Posts: 125
Raptor119 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Between the 1406 and the 1406 I guess I would go with the 1406.

You may want to correct your post as I think you made a mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-11-2014, 06:27 PM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker jowilker is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 22,661
jowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to behold
https://www.facebook.com/?ref=tn_tnmn jowilker
About 500 cfm should run the truck just fine, no more than 600.



John
__________________
In the cool still quiet hours of night, you can hear chevies rusting away.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11-2014, 07:13 PM
mfnheff mfnheff is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 16
mfnheff is starting off with a positive reputation.
Haha thanks raptor.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2014, 08:03 AM
baddad457 baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 6,592
baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor119 View Post
Between the 1406 and the 1406 I guess I would go with the 1406.

You may want to correct your post as I think you made a mistake.
Ditto. His comp ratio is in the low tens. My choice for it ? Holley 3310 750
__________________
89 Ranger supercab-- 302-4bbl-- 4 speed 68 Mercury Monterey 390 4 bbl C-6 77 F100 400M C-6 67 Mustang fastback 427 2-4
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2014, 08:13 AM
mfnheff mfnheff is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 16
mfnheff is starting off with a positive reputation.
For future clarification I have a 1406 and a 1407. I'd run a qjet if I could but I don't like adapter plates.
On another note...reallt think my cr will be in the low 10s?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2014, 07:08 PM
baddad457 baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 6,592
baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfnheff View Post
.
On another note...reallt think my cr will be in the low 10s?
Definitely. You've built what amounts to a GT390 with those pistons and heads, along with the hotter cam. I upgraded the high compression 390 2V in the 68 Merc I had a few years back with a Crane 272* Energizer, keeping the factory flat tops and C8AE-H heads (same heads as your D2's) topped with a 428PI intake and a 750 Holley. It wouldn't digest 87 octane fuel but was fine with 89. Also ran a 67 GT390 in a 70 F100 with a similar cam, it too was fine on 89.
__________________
89 Ranger supercab-- 302-4bbl-- 4 speed 68 Mercury Monterey 390 4 bbl C-6 77 F100 400M C-6 67 Mustang fastback 427 2-4
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-13-2014, 09:31 AM
MIKES 68 F100's Avatar
MIKES 68 F100 MIKES 68 F100 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Antelope Valley ,CA
Posts: 2,727
MIKES 68 F100 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.MIKES 68 F100 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
my truck likes the 3310 750 , just need to change the primary jets down a size .
I had a 600,650dp on there for a little runs much better with the 750.
oh I did put an adjustable vacuum secondary diaphragm on
__________________
390
10:1 C/R
Lunati 62001 cam kit
home ported heads/Flotech headers
Edelbrock performer intake /Holley 750
22 Gallon mustang gas tank Mod
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-14-2014, 04:07 PM
tater_51 tater_51 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 242
tater_51 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I run an old Autolite 4100 on my 416, easy to rebuild, tune, might not be the newest technology but it get's my 75 F100 down the road.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-14-2014, 04:10 PM
mfnheff mfnheff is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 16
mfnheff is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks for the info guys. I'm gonna try the 1405 I ended up with. It was in a 1406 box. The guy let me have a jet kit since I didn't argue with his price so I should be able to get it where it runs right. Hopefully the engine swap will happen this weekend
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-15-2014, 05:47 AM
Hypoid's Avatar
Hypoid Hypoid is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 2,529
Hypoid has a good reputation on FTE.Hypoid has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfnheff View Post
Heads are d2 with stock valves... No port matching... 1961 ford aluminum 4 barrel.
Big port manifold to small port head... You might get better throttle response from a later intake and 600 cfm carb.
__________________
NO PRIDE-NO SHAME
'74 F-100 4x4: It's ugly, loud and smelly. Those are it's good points!

'96 Ranger XLT, 2.3L, 5-speed, 2 wheel drive.

Email me at Hypoids.haus at yahoo, visit me at RMFTC.com/forums
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-15-2014, 06:17 AM
mfnheff mfnheff is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 16
mfnheff is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypoid View Post
Big port manifold to small port head... You might get better throttle response from a later intake and 600 cfm carb.
Something like that. I'll run this intake for the time being. I was curious to see how it runs with the mismatched ports myself. Since I'm not building an engine for all out performance I probably won't be too upset. If it were something I'd race and spend time at high rpms I'd not even consider the intake/head combo. But we'll see.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:38 AM
raven3 raven3 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 286
raven3 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Stock Autolite 2V 2100 with retrofit manual choke.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-18-2014, 11:04 AM
Krewat's Avatar
Krewat Krewat is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 34,384
Krewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputation
Large port manifold to small port head might cause gas to drop out of the mixture as it hits the "wall" surrounding the small port. Causing all sorts of weird issues that'll have you thinking the carb needs more tuning.

I could be wrong of course
__________________
- art k. - Moderator for the Superduty, V10, 6.2L and FE forums
'13 Taurus SHO 3.5L Ecoboost w/Perf Pkg
'01 F250SD SC SB XLT V10 4x4 Volant CAI Hedman headers 5-star custom tunes on SCT X3
'97 Cougar XR7 30th Anniv Edition 4.6L
'74 F250 Highboy FE390 deceased!
I've been wrong before, I'll be wrong again. Just wait and see. ®
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-18-2014, 02:18 PM
85e150six4mtod 85e150six4mtod is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,024
85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation
"Loading up" at idle or low revs could be one result. Followed by a bog and a cloud of black smoke when you step into it a bit more.

ymmv, doesn't cost much to try it.
Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2014, 02:18 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My economic 390 project 0ldman 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 29 07-07-2014 09:32 PM
Got to ride in a *hot* six today! uncle_jessie Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300 30 10-13-2013 10:09 PM
Need some info. from those who know carbs. jackwallace 1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 9 04-23-2013 09:39 PM
best cam for 390 FE???? 1976f150dude 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 14 03-26-2013 05:36 PM
fine tuning edelbrock/carter FlatBlak Performance & General Engine Building 2 10-10-2012 09:06 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup